More
and more and more
By our Political Editor
A long way back - in 1986 to be precise - it was
after the full-blown race riots in Sri Lanka. In a sense, the guerrilla
struggle for a separate state in north and east of the country was
still in infancy. A plethora of groups of young men had taken to
arms, divided Jaffna into their own turfs while the Sri Lanka Army
was in hot pursuit.
Most
of the groups were having offices in neighbouring Tamil Nadu, across
the Palk Straits, in southern India where the politicians of the
day were providing them with succour in the form of abode, finance
and even training facilities.
The
central Government in New Delhi was squeezing the arm of President
J.R. Jayewardene, forcing him to talk with the rebels, primus-inter-pares
at the time being, Velupillai Prabhakaran's Liberation Tigers of
Tamil Eelam (LTTE). The Thimpu talks the previous year had failed
to break the impasse. The LTTE - and other groups - declared what
they called the Thimpu Declaration which, inter-alia, called for
the recognition of a Tamil Homeland in the island's north and east,
which was unacceptable to the Government of the day.
In
1986, President Jayewardene was proceeding to Bangalore for the
SAARC summit. The Indians who had by then taken control of things
here were forcing the LTTE to come there as well. The rival Tamil
rebel groups were agog. Was the LTTE now going to talk after their
leader had labelled all the Tamil political leaders of the day as
scoundrels and traitors for dealing with the Colombo Government?
The LTTE had boasted it would win 'Eelam' on the battle fields of
the north and east.
These
were pre-mobile phone, IDD facilities and satellite communication
days. But radio frequencies were easily accessible, and the groups
would have to rely on radio links to communicate with their cadres
across the Palk Straits - and they would also listen-in on the conversations
other groups would be having with themselves. This was a known fact.
Each group knew the other was eaves-dropping, and sometimes, when
nothing else was happening, they would curse each other, but they
wouldn't know exactly which transmission was being tapped into.
And there was no other way of communicating either.
Enter
Douglas Devananda, a former leader of the former EPRLF (Eelam Peoples'
Revolutionary Liberation Front) and present leader of the EPDP (Eelam
Peoples Democractic Party) as well as cabinet minister of the incumbent
UPFA Government.
Mr.
Devananda, who once trained in Yasser Arafat's Bekaa Valley training
camps in Beirut, was behind one of his sets, eaves-dropping on LTTE
conversations one day. All the groups at the time, the EPRLF, TELO,
PLOTE and the EROS, were keen to know if the LTTE would go to Bangalore
to have talks with President Jayewardene. Some of the LTTE hardliners
were being difficult. They were refusing to go for talks. Their
long-time spokesman Anton Balasingham was equally insistent that
they do.
One
of their hardliners, Thileepan who later fasted unto death in protest
of the IPKF - the Indian Army's presence in the north and east post-1987
- radioed to Madras (now Chennai) where Balasingham was residing
at his fairly comfortable Besant Nagar residence along the tree-lined
Adyar area:
Thileepan: "Annai ( Elder brother ), are you going for talks?".
Balasingham : "Yes, we are going for talks".
Thileepan:
"What are we going to tell our people? We have always told
them that we can't believe the Sinhala Government, and that we have
to go in for an armed struggle".
Balasingham: "We will place our demands and tell what we want.
Otherwise we will go in for an armed struggle".
Thileepan: "What if the Government agrees to our demands."
Balasingham: "We will put forward more demands."
Douglas
Devananda is fond of telling this story over the years, driving
home the point that the LTTE is feigning peace talks, and even if
it does come for talks, it is likely that it will, like Oliver Twist,
keep asking for more, and more, and more.
The
LTTE's pathological hate for Mr. Devananda is no top secret, and
feelings are clearly mutual. It was only last morning Tigers gunned
down one of his top men in the north, Thambithurai Pathmaraja. He
was one of his main men in Tellipalai and had to be moved to the
safety of the Rathmalyaya village in Puttalam. But Tiger guerrillas
had got wind of it. Their pistol gang shot him dead.
Giving
the Devananda disclosure credence, however, is the LTTE's actual
conduct, not just then, but even now. The rebel group that has effectively
eliminated the EPRLF, TELO and PLOTE leadership and only couldn't
deal with the EPDP, however hard it has tried, not too far back
i.e. on October 31, 2003 proposed ISGA (Interim Self Governing Authority
) as its document in response to proposals of the then Colombo Government,
the Ranil Wickremesinghe's UNF Government.
The
UNF Government responded the next day, however lukewarmly with Prof.
G.L. Peiris, the UNF negotiator, saying that ISGA can be discussed
together with the Government's proposals.
But
just then, the then Opposition PA raised hell clinically analysing
ISGA, and calling it a 'sell-out', which it was, except that the
UNF Government had not agreed to ISGA. They had agreed only to discuss
it. ISGA was used as a launching pad to clinch a partnership with
the JVP, take it as an election issue, and throw out the UNF Government.
In power and place, the PA-JVP coalition (UPFA Government) said
that ISGA could be discussed together with the Government's proposals.
A reversal, no doubt, but then the LTTE took up a different stance,
saying talk on ISGA - or nothing.
Desperate
to accommodate the LTTE, the UPFA Government took another side step.
It now says, "ok, lets talk ISGA first", preferring to
keep silent on whether ISGA or a self-rule authority must be set
up first before talking on other issues, like the final solution.
The JVP, however, is adamant that the final solution must be discussed
along with ISGA, a shift from its hard-line stance itself.
Now
comes still another manoeuvre on the part of the LTTE. The LTTE's
political wing leader S.P. Thamilselvan, who runs the rebel group's
day-to-day business, the kind of CEO, this week goes on record saying
that the movement is prepared to be "not rigid". Neatly
timed with the partly Norwegian funded National Peace Council taking
a team of 'southern' journalists to meet him, where he drops this
neat plant to unsuspecting 'southern' journos', on the eve of Norwegian
peace broker Erik Solheim's visit to the Wanni just a few days later.
It was a timely feeler. The Peace Council cleverly took these journos
for a good ride.
The
Tamilnet follows up as if they are only following-up, with the following;
Quoting an interview given to a 'southern' journalist, Tamilnet
says (they classically quote the 'southern' journalist's interview),
and then adds that what Mr. Thamilselvan said was that the LTTE
proposals were "not rigid or final and should be discussed
at the negotiating table".
"However,
he said that the government should not put forward counter proposals
before resuming the negotiations and insisted that the ISGA proposals
should be the basis for the talks to begin," Tamilnet quoted
Mr. Thamilselvan as saying -echoing the words used in the Colombo
press.
So,
what the Tamilnet says what the Colombo press said Mr. Thamilselvan
said, is a dramatic shift from its earlier position, for he told
The Sunday Times only last month that the very setting up of ISGA
"was a must" (Mr. Thamilselvan's words), and that the
proposals for it received a mandate from the Tamil people through
the TNA. To use his own words, he wanted the ISGA institutionalized.
But
more so, the new wording needs to be gone over once more. "The
government should not put forward counter proposals BEFORE resuming
the negotiations". This is the shift in their stance. There
is no mention of the Government putting forward counter proposals
AFTER resuming negotiations.
So
when Mr. Solheim lands in Sri Lanka, the LTTE is willing to be "not
rigid". Happy with that new position, Mr. Solheim says the
Government must ensure there is a consensus in the 'south' , and
that its forces must stop supporting para-military units attacking
the LTTE. The LTTE, of course, must also stop killings in the east,
he adds. With such sound advice, Mr. Solheim left Colombo back to
Oslo where he came from. He met everyone in Colombo but was not
granted an audience with Mr. Prabhakaran. He could only meet the
LTTE-CEO.
When
his parting words to the local media is that there is "frustration"
all round, within the Government, the LTTE and the people, with
the stalemate, one could surely add that there is also frustration
with the Norwegians. For they have simply not delivered the goods,
or in this case, the peace. And a lowly functionary like Mr. Solheim
making an occasional visit to this country to see what's going-on
in this outpost, is obviously proving not good enough.
What
then is actually happening? From what we hear the LTTE knows that
its inflexible stand - to establish ISGA first/then talks -- does
not have universal approval. It is seen as being utterly unreasonable,
even by the pacifists, something certainly no self-respecting government
can agree to, quite apart from JVP's opposition.
The
LTTE does not want the Norwegians to agree with the Colombo Government
either that it is they (the LTTE ) who are being inflexible. Nor
for President Chandrika Kumaratunga to go to New York and tell the
world that it is the LTTE that is being rigid.
The LTTE is keen to lay the blame on the Colombo Government, and
its divisions, which argument has some currency, for the delay in
re-starting negotiations.
Now
comes the un-written 'deal'. The LTTE has sent signals to Colombo
urging the Government to agree to saying that they will talk on
the LTTE's proposals, ISGA. Once that is agreed, the LTTE is willing
to accept a Government proposal.
This
is what Mr. Thamilselvan carefully crafted by saying the Colombo
Government should not put forward counter-proposals BEFORE starting
negotiations on ISGA. Counter-proposals AFTER, is another matter,
it seems.
This,
in effect, would mean that the LTTE position of wanting ISGA created
before any further talks is no longer its position. This is a kind
of gerrymandering of sorts through the negotiating process. They
want to show up to their cadres that they are not yielding to the
Government, and yet, showing the world-at-large that they are willing
to be "not rigid".
This
would again put the cat among the pigeons in the UPFA camp. While
undoubtedly it would put pressure on President Kumaratunga to accept
such a position vis-à-vis the 'southern electorate', she
is quite the person who will do it.
How
the JVP can explain all this to its constituency is the question.
It is already under pressure for going back on its words in many
other fronts. On the military front, the LTTE is making some noises,
taking pictures of Army bunkers, abducting policemen and doing some
spot-assassinations. Yet, its clout in eastern Batticaloa has been
considerably weakened by the Karuna breakaway. How ready it is for
another full-blown war is one thing, but launching a typical guerrilla
war is another.
The
newly appointed Tri-Services Chief Admiral Daya Sandagiri this week
sounded a stern warning to the LTTE. In the process, however, he
fired a salvo across the bow of the politicians.
After
inspecting a tri service guard-of-honour upon assuming office as
Chief of Defence Staff, at the auspicious hour, he said that if
the Government provided the Navy its full requirements, the LTTE
would be easily defeated at sea. He repeated it again at the annual
parade of the Naval Volunteer Force on Friday. His fire may have
been aimed at the former UNF Government, but he forgets that the
UPFA Government has held the Defence Ministry for the past 10 months.
It
was also cute that such a remark should come from Admiral Sandagiri
who just refused a Government offer to buy him the best gun for
the re-conditioned US coast-guard cutter "Courageous",
and he decided to turn down the offer saying it was too expensive.
He declared that the drought and rising oil prices had made things
difficult but a Cabinet Minister said it was not for service chiefs
to say those things. Not when the Government is able to buy them
the best despite all the problems.
He
had wanted to save money for the Government by fitting a second-hand
gun from "Sayura" fitted onto "Courageous ",
which a defence analyst compared to fixing a mechanical braking
system to a BMW equipped with state of the art ABS systems (though
"Courageous " is not exactly a BMW).
This
week, after some criticism, he said he would find another gun, though
again, it’s not what the Government has offered him. So, while
the Sri Lankan Defence Establishment fights over a single gun to
be fitted to a ship, and Sri Lankan Air Force pilots are being forced
to fly down some shaky aircraft from Ukraine, much against their
wishes, to its dwindling fleet, the LTTE is planning a world-wide
campaign to prop up its own shaky image.
CEO
Thamilselvan plans a visit to Europe very soon for this purpose.
Except that the entire exercise has received a thundering rebuff
from a respected Tamil politician. V. Anandasangaree, the leader
of the TULF, has issued a letter from Toronto setting out the coercion
and fear the LTTE is applying on the Tamil diaspora, and calling
the Canadian Government to ban the proposed 'Pongu Thamil' rally
there.
The
likes of Mr. Anandasangaree and Mr. Devananda - and Karuna, have
become thorough embarrassments to the LTTE and its much heralded
' Sole Representatives of the Tamils ' theory.
Mr.
Devananda does not stop telling people the 1986 story where the
LTTE keeps changing its stand from time-to-time to suit its purpose.
He is defiant even in the wake of his men being gunned down.
He
says that what the LTTE is now working towards is dragging the peace
process until the next Presidential elections next year, when they
will once again be touted by the politicians of the 'south'.
In
the process, he says, they will want to create a situation like
in East Timor, where they will show the world that they have a State-in-waiting.
Then, after dragging this process through the months and the years,
they will claim nationhood status. |