Big
fraud and billion-rupee scandal in latest MiG deal
Was Defence Ministry misled? Another case for
presidential probe commission
Sri Lanka’s latest and largest military deal,
the procurement of four MiG-27 ground attack craft and overhaul
to seven others now with the Air Force worth over billions of rupees
(or millions of dollars) has raised a number of questions, an investigation
by The Sunday Times has revealed.
A contract between the Air Force (SLAF) on behalf
of the Government of Sri Lanka and the Ukranian Government-owned
firm Ukrinmarsh is touted as a Government-to-Government deal. Such
deals are made to obviate the need to call for tenders to pick the
lowest bidder. The widely accepted principle in these deals, referred
to, as G-to-G, is the elimination of third parties or intermediaries
who make fat commissions and become billionaires overnight.
In this instance, the contract signed on July 26,
this year, identifies an offshore company, Bellimissa Holdings Limited
registered in the United Kingdom, as the “Designated Party”.
The cost of the four MiG-27s, freight and other charges will go
direct to this company which the contract stipulates, “…shall
be involved to provide finance needed in executing this project”.
A copy seen by The Sunday Times is titled “THE
SRI LANKA AIR FORCE for and on behalf of the Democratic Socialist
Republic of Sri Lanka and M/S STATE SELF-SUPPORTING FOREIGN TRADE
AND INVESTMENT FIRM “UKRINMARSH” (subsidiary of ‘UKRSPETSEXPORT’)
UKRAINE for…..”
The contract has been signed just one day before
July 27, 2006 when Lanka Logistics and Technologies Limited, a wholly
state-owned limited liability company came into being to procure
all equipment and services for the armed forces and the Police.
The emergence of this company was reported exclusively in The Sunday
Times (Situation Report) of November 26. The formation of this company
is the brainchild of Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa. He is
determined to eliminate the role of third parties who have in the
past become rich overnight in military procurements through dubious
means. He wants to divert part of earnings of the new company for
troop’s welfare.
The Sunday Times investigation revealed that this
deal has been initiated via suave and diplomatic means by politically
influential persons. An unsuspecting Ministry of Defence, it came
to light, seems to be unaware of the fuller details and the deeper
background. What is even more shocking is that the MiG-27s in question
were left over from a fleet from which the Air Force carefully selected
and purchased seven units earlier. This was on two different occasions.
That was six years ago and the prices were much lower. And now,
they have been contracted for at higher prices. Documents obtained
by The Sunday Times show that the first was on May 25, 2000 when
four MiG-27 ground attack aircraft were purchased for US $ 1.75
million (or about Rs 189 million) each. They were manufactured between
1982 and 1985. The second purchase was on October 24, 2000. In this
deal, two MiG-27s were purchased at US $1.6 million (about Rs 172.8
million) each. One was manufactured in 1981 and the other in 1984.
A MiG-23 UB trainer was procured for US $ 900,000 (or about Rs.
97. 2 million). This unit was manufactured in 1984.
The Sunday Times investigations revealed that the
purchase price for the latest deal, four MiG-27s, is US$ 2,462,000
(or Rs 265,896,000) each. The total cost without freight works out
to US $ 9,848,000 (or Rs 1,063,584,000). This is for the ground
attack aircraft manufactured between 1980 and 1983, in terms of
the contract.
The Sunday Times is in possession of documents
to confirm that the Air Force concluded two previous deals for seven
MiGs as pure commercial transactions. They were not classified as
“Government to Government.” These purchases were made
by the Air Force from DS Alliance Private Limited, a Singapore-based
firm which offered a finance package. The aircraft were delivered
by “Lviv State Aircraft Repair Plant” which is a “State
Enterprise” under the Ukranian Ministry of Defence. Like in
the latest deal, the supply of the MiGs came then through Ukrinmarsh
via D.S. Alliance Pvt. Ltd.
The latest purchase of four MiG-27s (on July 26) involving Bellimissa
Holdings as a third party is declared a “Government-to-Government
deal”. Documents in possession of The Sunday Times show that
the aircraft purchased from Ukrinmarsh are also being delivered
by the same Lviv State Aircraft Repair Unit. That is not all. Under
this deal, the Air Force has agreed (in terms of the contract) to
pay higher prices for the MiG aircraft which they did not deem fit
to procure earlier, according to documentary proof obtained by The
Sunday Times.
A question that begs answer is why the Ukranian
Government was unable to come up with a finance package to sell
their aircraft that have been lying on the ground for six years.
Bellimissa Holdings Ltd., The Sunday Times learnt, is a private
company where some Cabinet Ministers in Ukraine are known to have
a stake. It is also said to be strongly linked to the Singapore
firm that supplied MiGs earlier. This offshore company based in
London is said to have offered a two-year finance package. Payment
in four instalments, in addition to the telegraphic transfer of
freight charges in advance, is to be made through the People’s
Bank. This will begin with the Air Force presenting the Airway Bill
and the Factory Acceptance Certificate.
Making the situation worse, The Sunday Times investigation
reveals, is the composition of the four MiG-27s now being procured.
Two of these aircraft were offered to the Air Force by D.S. Alliance
Private Limited in May 2000 at a cost of US$ 1.75 million (or Rs
189 million) each. The Air Force did not deem it fit to obtain them.
But they are now being purchased at a cost of US $ 2,462,000 (or
Rs 265,896,000) or by paying a further US$ 712,000 (or Rs 76,896,000),
according to documents in possession of The Sunday Times.
A third MiG-27, also offered to the Air Force in
October 2000, by DS Alliance Private Limited, documents reveal,
for US$ 1.6 million (or Rs 172. 8 million approximately). Here again
an excess sum of US$ 862,000 (or about Rs 93,096,000) has been paid
for the same aircraft which was not deemed fit for purchase earlier.
It is not clear how prices of old aircraft are higher when they
should be lower as they age. Unlike antiques, they do not have a
value as they become older.
The latest contract between the Air Force and Ukrinmarsh,
through a third party (Bellimissa Holdings Limited), is in two parts.
The first is for the purchase of four MiG-27 ground attack aircraft.
The second is for the overhaul of three MiG-27 M aircraft and a
MiG-23 UB trainer, all of them currently part of Air Force assets.
Another shocking, if not unconscionable, feature
of this overhaul, The Sunday Times investigation reveals, were the
costs. The fee for the overhaul of the MiG-23 UB trainer, according
to the contract, is US$ 1.1 million or (Rs 118,800,000). Documentary
proof obtained by The Sunday Times shows the cost at which the Air
Force purchased this trainer in October 2000 was only US$ 900,000
(or Rs 97.2 million). Hence, it defies all logic that an overhaul
is more costly than the purchase of a trainer MiG aircraft.
The Sunday Times spoke with a cross section of
Air Force as well as other Government officials with regard to the
latest deal. For fear of not being authorized to comment on the
record, they spoke on grounds of anonymity. Almost all of them were
of the view that the Ukranian deal should be fully investigated
to ascertain whether the Ministry of Defence was misled. A Government
official suggested that the mandate of a three member Presidential
Commission of Inquiry now probing military procurements be extended
to cover this deal.
They point out that this is both in keeping with
President Mahinda Rajapaksa and his Government’s commitment
to transparency in military procurements. It is this policy that
prompted his appointment of Commissions to probe some previous military
deals so corrective measures could be taken. That is to ensure that
large sums of tax payer’s money is not skimmed off by third
parties or intermediaries through kick backs on military procurements,
they pointed out. Another claimed that there were lower offers from
other parties to supply MiGs (also from Ukrinmarsh) but this could
not be independently verified.
|