Fitch Ratings: Local banks manage capital impact of SLFRS 9
View(s):Sri Lankan banks have been able to manage the capital impact of first-time adoption of SLFRS 9 accounting standards, in line with expectations, due to capital infusions ahead of full implementation of Basel III, satisfactory profitability buffers and the four-year phasing-in period, Fitch Ratings says.
Sri Lanka adopted SLFRS 9 on January 1, 2018, but banks were permitted to follow the older accounting standard, SLAS 39, in calculating credit costs until end-2018. Two banks reported credit costs under SLFRS 9 at end-3Q18 while the rest moved to SLFRS 9 in their end-2018 statements, the rating agency said in a media release.
The local regulator (Central Bank) has allowed banks to spread the one-time impact of SLFRS 9 implementation over four years for the purpose of calculating regulatory capital ratios. This reduces pressure on banks to raise capital over and above the equity they have already raised (Rs. 50 billion in 2017 and Rs. 24 billion in 2018) in preparation for full implementation of Basel III on 1 January 2019.
Twelve of the 16 local Fitch-rated banks have now disclosed the day-one impact of SLFRS 9 in their 2018 financial statements, based on their end-2017 balance-sheet position. Their aggregate opening loan loss allowances increased by Rs. 32 billion, or 27 per cent, from the end-2017 position.
This translates to a reduction in their regulatory capital ratio of about 50bp-60bp on average. Eleven of the 12 banks could have met the Basel III capital ratio requirements in full at January 2019, even without the permitted capital benefit from deferring the SLRFS 9 impact.
“Bank of Ceylon (BOC) had the highest one-time impact from SLFRS 9 among the domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs). The impact of 0.9 per cent of risk-weighted assets would have reduced its Tier 1 capital ratio below the 10 per cent minimum requirement for D-SIBs, if applied in full to its Fitch-estimated end-2018 capital ratio,” Fitch said.
“We believe that banks that need or choose to strengthen capital buffers will continue to raise capital in 2019. However, they could face execution risks given the macro instability. Furthermore, we expect asset quality to remain under pressure, as reflected in a rise in rescheduled loans and a surge in non-performing loans in 2018. We expect asset-quality pressures to remain manageable but we will reassess the trends if loan impairments significantly exceed our expectations,” it said.