Bush, Blair lose talking war
Search on for 10 more terrorists
Bamiyan Buddhas resurrected in China
Omar: a method in madness
Bush, Blair lose talking war
By Robert Fisk
Messrs Bush and Blair may tell the world they are going to win the "war
against terrorism" but in the Middle East, where Osama bin Laden is acquiring
almost mythic status among Arabs, they have already lost.
Whether it be a Lebanese minister, a Saudi journalist, a Jordanian bank
clerk or an Egyptian resident, the response is always the same: Mr bin
Laden's voice, repeatedly beamed into millions of homes, articulates the
demands and grievances – and fury – of Middle East Muslims who have seen
their pro-Western presidents and kings and princes wriggling out of any
serious criticism of the Anglo-American bombardment of Afghanistan.
Viewing Mr. bin Laden's latest video tape, Western nations concentrated
on his remarks about the atrocities in the United States. If he expressed
his approval, though denied any personal responsibility, didn't this mean
that he was really behind the mass slaughter of 11 September?
Arabs listened with different ears. They heard a voice which accused
the West of double standards and "arrogance'' towards the Middle East,
a voice which addressed the central issue in the lives of so many Arabs:
the Palestinian- Israeli conflict and the continuation of Israeli occupation.
Now, as a long-time resident of Cairo put it, Arabs believe America "is
trying to kill the one man ready to tell the truth''.
Arab civilians, usually uneasy about identifying themselves when their
views conflict with their government, are now speaking more freely about
their anger. "They say their target is bin Laden,'' Samar al-Naji said
in Jordan. "Then they strike at innocent people in Afghanistan who have
nothing to do with terrorism. "They strike Muslims while ignoring the acts
of Israel, the terrorist state which is demolishing Palestinian homes and
killing women and children.'' Mr al-Naji is only a bank clerk, at 29 hardly
a seasoned politician.
At the Ain Shams University in Cairo, prayers were performed for the
dead of Afghanistan and in the Nile delta town of Zagazig, students went
to the heart of the problem. "Our rulers, why are you silent?'' they chanted.
"Have you got orders from America?'' This is rubbish, of course. Rulers
of what we like to call "moderate" Arab states don't need orders to give
their discreet support to the West. And Mr bin Laden is, after all, calling
for their own overthrow.
Only in the freer Arab countries could ministers speak their minds.
The Lebanese information minister, Ghazi Aridi, regards Mr bin Laden's
video tape as "a stroke of intelligence''. There was, he said, "an international
incitement against one person. If he is killed, he will become a symbol
and if he survives he will become a stronger symbol.''
In the Gulf, feelings are very fragile. "Look, I know old women who
are staying up late at night to say prayers for Mr bin Laden,'' a Saudi
journalist says. "His appearance on television was good public relations
for him, especially when he talked about Palestine. In public, people don't
praise him. But in private, they are all talking about him.''
A Lebanese construction manager shouted at me, "When you have enemies,
they are 'terrorists' or 'madmen' or 'evildoers'. When we have enemies,
we are asked to compromise with them. You have bin Laden. We have Sharon
– who is your friend and whose hand Mr Bush shakes". - Independent, London
Search on for 10 more terrorists
US immigration officials are racing against time to comb through years
of data in a search for up to 10 trained al-Qaida hijackers who, investigators
believe, are still on the loose in America.
Evidence has emerged on both sides of the Atlantic that indicates there
were plans to hijack two more airliners on September 11 and that several
of the would-be hijackers have yet to be caught.
Since September 11 there has been speculation over the existence of
more hijack cells, apart from the 19 terrorists who took over four airliners
and crashed them into the World Trade Centre, the Pentagon, and a rural
area in Pennsylvania.
Following the discovery of fresh documentary evidence, investigators
in the US and Europe are working on the assumption that 30 terrorists,
in six teams, were intended to have taken part in the onslaught. It is
thought at least one plane was to have been aimed at the White House.
An intelligence source in the US said another plane due to have been
hijacked was a Continental Airlines flight from Newark on the morning of
September 11. Retractable knives (similar to Stanley knives) of the same
type used in the four successful hijackings were found taped to the backs
of fold-down trays.
The source did not give details of the sixth plane. However, similar
knives were found stashed in the seats on a plane which had been due to
leave Logan airport in Boston the same morning, and which was delayed and
then cancelled.
The new evidence specified the number of hijackers involved but did
not provide all their names, an intelligence source in the US said. Two
suspected members of the Hamburg-based cell where the plot is thought to
have been hatched are missing.
Both men, Said Bahaji and Ramzi bin al-Shibh, are thought to have formed
part of the operation's back-up structure and are thought to have fled
to Pakistan.
The only named suspect thought to have been part of the September 11
team is a Moroccan-French man in custody in New York. Zacarias Moussaoui
is seen as a possible fifth member of the hijack team which seized United
Airlines flight 93, the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania.
Moussaoui, who lived in London before leaving for the US early this
year, was detained on August 17 after his requests for flying lessons on
an airliner simulator aroused suspicion. He possessed only a student pilot's
licence and wanted to learn how to turn and fly straight, not how to take
off or land. Two Indian citizens, Mohamed Azmath and Ayub Khan, have also
been under suspicion of involvement. They were arrested on September 12
in Texas on a train from St Louis to San Antonio. – Guardian, London
Bamiyan Buddhas resurrected in China
Sichuan — A Chinese entrepreneur is attempting to resurrect the giant Buddhas
destroyed by the Taleban regime in Afghanistan by building replicas of
them in China.
The project is the idea of Liang Shi-mian, who expects them to be finished
early next year. He has begun building a towering red stone version of
one of the Bamiyan statues in his country's Buddhist heartland.
Some 375 stonecutters and carvers are working all hours to complete
the 121ft sculpture by March, the one year anniversary of the destruction
of the originals.
The piece will become the centrepiece of a Buddhist tourist park in
China's southwestern province of Sichuan.
The five million yuan (£410,000) Chinese version will be slightly
different from the original.
"The lower part of the Buddha's face is in accordance with the remains
of the original Buddha," said He Yining, a professor of sculpture at the
Sichuan Art Academy.
"But the details on the face are definitely different from the original."
Much of the face of the original had been lost to weather and vandalism
over the years. The destruction was part of a Taleban attack on what they
considered pagan idols.
Although China destroyed most of its own Buddhist relics during the
decade-long Cultural Revolution that began in 1966, followers of the faith
have since mushroomed.
The new Buddha statue will join 3000 other replicas already on show
in Oriental Buddha City, under a mile away from what China claims is the
world's largest ancient Buddha - the 233ft Dafo Buddha built 12 centuries
ago.- Buddhist News Network
Omar: a method in madness
By Hamid Mir
Everyone is talking about Osama bin Laden but few people know there is
one man who can give orders to Osama. This man is Mullah Omar. That is
why Omar is more important than Osama. Many people think Omar is mad. Is
he?
Omar came on the scene after he killed the kidnapper of a girl in Spin
Boldik and got her released at the request of her father. The incident
made him a hero. In those days Gulbuddin Hekmatyar controlled Spin Boldik
and the surrounding areas of Kandahar. The city of Kandahar was occupied
by Gul Agha, a close aide of Syed Ahmed Gillani (National Islamic Front).
Gillani was associated with Burhanuddin Rabbani and Ahmed Shah Masoud,
who controlled Kabul at that time. When Omar began his offensive against
the warlords of Hekmatyar, Rabbani and Masoud were very happy.
The American CIA noticed the potential of the young Mullah and the then
Prime Minister of Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto, was asked to help this new
student militia known as the Taliban. It is interesting that Omar occupied
the area from Spin Boldik to western Kandahar with the help of Rabbani
and Masoud. Later, he attacked the city of Kandahar, and despite requests
from Rabbani and Masoud, the local governor Gul Agha was assassinated publicly
because he was a homosexual and had married a young boy. That was a turning
point in the life of Omar. The Afghanis realised that the Taliban were
against all warlords; they only protected the interests of the poor.
In the next two years, Taliban captured Kabul, Jalalabad and Herat with
the help of Maulvi Younas Khalis and Jalaluddin Haqqani. When Jalalabad
came under the control of the Taliban, Osama was living there as the guest
of Jalaluddin Haqqani. Their friendship began in September 1996. Next year,
the Taliban captured Mazar-e-Sharif with the help of Osama. Those were
the days when Pakistan started putting pressure on Omar for the extradition
of Osama to the US.
Americans were angry with Omar because he refused to oblige their oil
company, UNOCAL. UNOCAL was interested in a US$5 bn gas pipeline project
from Turkmenistan to Pakistan. One UNOCAL official offered big money to
Omar through one of his colleagues. Omar got angry and signed the MoU with
Bridas, an Argentinian company. That was the beginning of the confrontation
between Omar and the US. The Americans used both Pakistani and the Saudi
officials to convince Omar. The chief of Saudi Intelligence, Prince Turki,
visited Omar in early 1998 and said that if Osama were handed over to America,
they would reconstruct the whole of Afghanistan. Omar reacted very angrily
and told the prince off.
The Taliban also refused to be dictated by the Musharraf government.
Musharraf is using the same language about the Taliban that Sharif used
two years ago.
Omar was expecting a US attack even before September 11. Some of his
extremist policies are not liked in Pakistan but the majority of Pakistanis
are opposed to the US and admire him for defying Washington. His vision
of Islam is influenced by the Afghan tribal traditions. No one can deny
that he brought peace to Taliban-controlled areas after 16 years of civil
war. He disarmed the Afghan tribal society, which is a big contribution.
Omar lost one eye fighting the Soviets. He is ready to sacrifice his
life fighting the US. The Taliban are preparing for a long guerrilla war
against the US and Omar is waiting for the entry of the US ground troops
into Afghanistan. He thinks the war against America will not be restricted
to Afghanistan; it will be fought around the globe.
He was very happy when General Musharraf decided to side with the US.
When he heard the decision, he told his commanders in Kandahar "Now the
whole world will know that we are not the puppets of Pakistan. We are independent
and will fight the superpower independently". He is a typical Pathan. He'd
rather the US kill him than be murdered by history. - The Friday Times,
Pakistan |