The Sunday Times Economic analysis
Note on economy before you vote
The effective implementation of economic policies by a political
regime capable of handling the management of the economy is vitally needed.
The merit of the 1977 regime was not merely the fact that it pursued pragmatic
economic policies, but that it had a cabinet with a capacity to implement
its economic policies.
By the Economist
In three days' time, the nation will make a choice.
A choice between two political parties or two coalitions. Yet it is indeed
an economic choice.
It's an economic choice of very serious proportions. The country is
in dire economic straits and the global economy is in recession. We have
not had any effective economic management in the past year. Hard times
are ahead. Hard choices and strong economic management is the need of the
hour.
What are the needed ingredients of the new regime? First of all the
country requires a government that could pursue clear-cut economic policies
without hindrance from within. A coalition that consists of parties that
have divergent views would be a disaster. This is especially so if the
economic programmes of such parties are driven by strong ideological considerations.
A coalition is workable only if it is based on a common programme that
has been accepted prior to the election. A coalition, where the government's
power is dependent on a minority support that requires it to pursue policies
that are in contradiction to its own policies, is the worst type of coalition
for economic performance. A government that is constituted by a single
party, or a coalition with an agreed economic programme is essential.
The second need of the hour is a team of good managers of the economy.
Economic performance has much to do with the effective implementation of
policies as with the kind of policies pursued. The inability to choose
the correct personnel to head institutions, monitor performance of economic
activities and to remove bottlenecks as they arise, are deficiencies that
could render even the correct economic policies of little use.
The effective implementation of economic policies by a political regime
capable of handling the management of the economy is vitally needed. The
merit of the 1977 regime was not merely the fact that it pursued pragmatic
economic policies, but that it had a cabinet with a capacity to implement
its economic policies.
A third requirement in the present international context is a pragmatic
approach to economic policy determination.
Ideological considerations based on the philosophies and doctrines of
the past would serve no purpose. The reality of local and global conditions
must be accepted and the policies pursued must bring results.
For instance, globalization is an economic reality. It is essential
to develop a competitive capacity to benefit from the globalization and
mitigate the adverse effects of globalization.
We must be realistic to accept that foreign investment is a vital need
to faster economic growth. We must be realistic to accept that a small
economy with a limited raw material base and small domestic market can
progress only through an effective linking with the international economy.
We have to pursue economic policies that would encourage more and better
foreign investors.
This requires not merely incentives for investment but the creation
of an environment conducive to foreign. The latter is far more difficult
to achieve than the provision of incentives such as tax concessions and
infrastructure.
Only a stable government that is clear in its long-term policy stance
and inspires confidence could provide a hospitable climate for foreign
investment.
Security conditions, political stability and law and order are important
determinants for inducing foreign investment. A regime that is not corrupt
is also vital for rapid economic growth. This requirement is not merely
an ethical one. It is a pragmatic consideration as corruption distorts
economic decision making, increases costs of economic projects and ultimately
results in poor economic performance.
An important feature of a new government must be its capacity to take
unpopular decisions for long-term economic growth.
Pandering to the public to gain popularity could ultimately vitiate
economic policies and performance. Hard economic decisions that are unpopular
need to be taken, if the country is to pull itself out of the present rut.
Much needed decisions to reform the administration, education and health
services, among others, would be unpopular. But they must be taken in the
long run interests of the country. Will the newly elected government shun
these responsibilities?
These are some of the considerations over which we must ponder before
casting our votes. If these issues are neglected and emotive and political
considerations alone determine our judgement, then we may face a disastrous
economic scenario from which it may be difficult to extricate ourselves.
The December 5th decision of the electorate will indeed be a historic economic
decision disguised in the form of a political decision. |