TRC
crisis delays cellphone rate hike
By Akhry Ameer
The government's failure to appoint members to the Telecom Regulatory
Commission (TRC) is delaying pressing regulatory decisions such
as a proposed tariff hike by mobile telephone operators.
The Commission
has not met since December 4 last year because the government has
delayed re-constituting its membership, TRC officials said.
Three mobile
operators, Celltel, Dialog GSM and Mobitel, recently ran a joint
press advertisement announcing that all call charges on their networks
would be increased by one rupee.
Media reports
that followed the advertisements revealed that the TRC had not approved
the tariff increase but that the operators were determined to go
ahead with the proposal.
R.D. Somasiri,
Director General of the TRC, maintained that this issue needs to
be put before the Commission. "The TRC has not approved the
tariff," he said. It was not possible for mobile operators
to go ahead with the tariff hike as planned because new members
have not been appointed to the Commission, he said.
Though the operators
may decide on a tariff plan, TRC officials would have to give their
findings on the matter for the Commission to take a decision on
the issue, he added.
John
Keells plans hotel in Goa
If things go according to plan, a John Keells hotel will emerge
in the popular Goa holiday resort on the Indian west coast.
"We are
looking at some properties in Goa and a due diligence is on at the
moment," said Keells group chairman Vivendra Lintotawela in
an interview. JKH has hotel properties in Sri Lanka and the Maldives
and has been considering the Indian investment since last year.
With Sri Lanka's
economy improving after a disastrous 2001, the group is planning
to bounce back to the 1999/2000 profit level. "Things are getting
back to normal. We can easily bounce back to the 1999/2000 profitability
figures," said Lintotawela after the company declared a 10
percent dividend for the year ending March 31, 2002.
He said the
current year's profitability, likely to be announced in June, would
be lower than last year but declined to give figures.
Investors
cautious despite truce
By John Breusch
Sri Lanka's sharemarket is expected to post a recovery later this
year on the back of a global economic revival, a lift in tourism
numbers and growing hopes of peace.
But while a continued ceasefire would provide a basis for significant
earnings growth over the coming years, investors remain cautious
about the chances of sustained peace.
The Colombo
Stock Exchange's benchmark, the All Share Index (ASI), has lost
ground since December 2001 as investors made profits in the wake
of a 75 percent surge induced by optimism surrounding the change
in government.
Although the
ruling United National Party (UNP) has in the past demonstrated
itself to be a more responsible economic manager than the People's
Alliance, analysts said there was little justification for the size
of the increase.
"If you
look at the fundamentals, there just wasn't anything to support
such a rise," said Radhika Jayasundera, assistant vice-president
of research at DFCC Stockbrokers.
But she said
a number of factors including recent interest rate cuts, reduced
power cuts and a rise in tourist arrivals should provide a basis
for an annualised 5 to 8 percent recovery in earnings in the second
half. However, she downplayed the implications for the share market.
"It might
be a very slow and steady [recovery in the market]," she said.
But Dushyanth Wijayasingha, head of research at Asia Securities,
is more confident, predicting the market will begin to lift 15 to
20 percent as early as late July.
He said the
re-rating would be underpinned by the improving global economy,
fewer power cuts, more amenable weather and greater clarity on the
prospects for peace once talks between the government and Tamil
Tiger rebels begin in Thailand.
But the progress of the peace-talks remains the wildcard.
Speaking at
his press conference in Kilinochchi earlier this month, LTTE leader
Velupillai Prabakaran provided little guidance about the likely
chances of a long-term solution to the two-decade conflict.
Chinthaka Ranasinghe,
head of research at John Keells Stockbrokers, attributed recent
low trading volumes to not only to the Sinhala and Tamil New Year
celebrations, but also the uncertainty surrounding Prabakaran's
statements.
"A lot of people [in the market] are waiting to see exactly
how the peace talks will progress,'' he said.
Nevertheless,
he said there are already signs that hopes for peace are leading
to renewed interest in the local market, with a pick up in foreign
investment over the past four months.
Ranasinghe expects
corporate profits for the year to March 30 to be down 22 to 23 percent
on last year.
But he predicted
a continued ceasefire would see earnings climb 25 to 28 percent
in 2003 and 45 percent in 2004.
However, investors
will require much more concrete evidence of a lasting peace before
these predictions translate into any improvement in the markets.
"Investors are very cautious about this because we've been
there many times," Jayasundera said.
Unilever's
tactics bother Tea Board
The Sri Lanka Tea Board has complained to Unilever Plc over what
appears to be the use of negative marketing tactics against Ceylon
tea by the multinational company's Saudi subsidiary in that Middle
Eastern market.
The issue relates
to a trade document that compares Unilever's Lipton Yellow Label
Tea with its main rival in the Saudi market, Rabea.
The document,
in the form of questions and answers, promotes Unilever Saudi Arabia's
Lipton Yellow Label Tea, which is made of Indian tea, claiming it
is superior to Rabea, which used to consist of pure Ceylon tea but
is now blended with other teas.
Rabea was previously
packed in Sri Lanka but is now packed in Jeddah to get over import
duty hurdles.
The document,
a copy of which was obtained by The Sunday Times Business, contains
statements like: "Lipton Long Leaf tea is finest quality Assam
with more flavour and body than the Ceylon teas" and "Assam
teas are much brighter, more golden in colour and superior tasting.
Unlike Sri Lankan teas, Lipton Long Leaf has more flavour and body."
Tea industry
officials have expressed concern over the issue because Saudi Arabia
is the fifth largest tea bag market for Ceylon tea and marketing
tactics which run down Ceylon tea could affect exports.
The matter was
brought to the notice of a visiting senior Unilever official, Sandy
Morrison, by Tea Board chairman Ronnie Weerakoon recently.
"We are
very disappointed with this type of unethical marketing," Weerakoon
said.
Tea industry experts said Unilever appears to be trying to catch
up with the market leader in the Saudi tea market which was Rabea.
"Tea marketing
is a cut-throat business," one tea expert said. It was not
clear whether the document was put out by Unilever Saudi Arabia
or by one of its distributors.
Unilever's local
outfit, Unilever Ceylon, said it was unaware of the document.
Unilever Ceylon chairman Ehsan Malik said: "I speak for Unilever
Ceylon - we have a separate company that looks after the Saudi and
Gulf market. The literature appears to be an information leaflet
aimed at the trade wholesalers and retail outlets. All claims made
about flavour, body and brightness and taste of Lipton tea are verifiable."
"Unilever
believes in vigorous yet fair competition. Wholesalers and retailers
are important partners. Leaflets are a tool for maintaining good
communication with the trade and for countering any claims made
by competitors.
"Unilever's
goal is to maximise consumer benefit, not exports from any country.
Consumer needs differ from country to country. Ceylon tea is an
important component of our blends in a number of markets. We have
consistently advocated blending to accord with global trends. Unfortunately,
due to the restriction of the import of orthodox teas into Sri Lanka
we had to close down our blending plant in Sri Lanka. Nevertheless,
Unilever Ceylon is amongst the top five exporters of Ceylon tea,"
Malik said.
Hasitha de Alwis,
director, Tea Promotion Bureau, said they had received complaints
from Sri Lankan tea exporters about the negative marketing effort.
|