Reforming
the military for poverty alleviation
By Ameen Izzadeen
Reforms
needed for a march towards professionalism and accountability
|
Bloated and
often unnecessary levels of military expenditure could offer political
security, but they threaten an individual's economic, psychological
and other aspects of security.
Such expenditure
hinders the eradication of poverty, stifles economic growth and
foreign investment, and increases the likelihood of militarisation,
instability and violence.
In this backdrop,
is there a need for security sector reforms in South Asia? This
was one of the two questions a British expert posed to a selected
audience - most of whom were retired service chiefs and top military
officers - at a Colombo lecture on Thursday.
The alleged
involvement of security forces in the Udathalawinna massacre and
other political violence, the attack on journalists by Presidential
Security Division personnel, increasing incidents of military deserters
carrying out armed robberies and contract killings all added up
to offer an answer. More could be added. For instance, allegations
such as the state national intelligence unit acting more like an
affiliated branch of the ruling party and alleged corruption in
military procurement.
Also flashed
across the thought process were military coups in Pakistan and Bangladesh,
Indian security forces' alleged excesses in Kashmir and recently
in Gujarat and the Nepali security forces alleged human rights violations
in their fight against Maoist rebels. Yes, we need reforms in the
security sector in South Asia in general and Sri Lanka in particular.
If these were
the thoughts that contributed to form the answer, the British expert
had other reasons to build up a case for security reforms in Third
World countries.
Dick Baly, a retired brigadier who is now working for the British
government's Department for International Development (DFID), told
the audience at the Regional Centre for Strategic Studies that his
government believed there was a strong correlation between poverty
alleviation or development and security reforms.
The British
government began to show a keen interest in security sector reforms
as a means of poverty alleviation after the United Nations Development
Programme's field work in some African countries established a strong
link between the two, concluding that without security there could
be no poverty alleviation or sustainable development. In an environment
where security is not guaranteed, crime increases and conflicts
arise.
Subsequent British research showed security sector reforms were
intricately connected to democratic features of good governance,
such as transparency and accountability.
On March 9, 1999 at King's College in London, British Development
Secretary Clare Short launched a ground-breaking security-sector-reform-policy
initiative, which officially acknowledged, for the first time, the
link between good governance, sustainable development and security-sector
reform, covering the armed forces, paramilitary groups, intelligence
units and the police.
The relationship
between security and development was largely a post-cold war phenomenon.
During the Cold War period, both the United States and the Soviet
Union armed Third World countries to the hilt mainly to prop up
their proxy regimes. The destructive role played by rulers was either
tolerated or ignored. But with the demise of the Cold War, Russia,
the political successor of the Soviet Union, was not in a position
to financially back its former allies. The West and international
financial agencies on the other hand attached several strings before
they offered aid to Third World countries. Such a scenario coupled
with continued military expenditure by many developing countries
as a result of new wars and internal conflicts brought the security
issue to the top of the development agenda.
According to
Brig. Baly, who is on a ground-assessing mission to South Asia,
security sector reforms do not mean demilitarisation. They are in
effect a move to make the armed services more effective and professional.
Security is a concept that is largely perceived as state-centred.
But in reality it operates at three levels - at individual level,
at state level and at international level. Providing security to
individuals is a responsibility of the state while the international
system will be stable only when security of states is assured. Thus
the three levels of security are interconnected. The bottomline
is when we talk about security, it is the individual security that
matters most. Security of the state and the international system
- two abstract concepts - should also be centred on the individual.
From a strict
territory-based definition, the concept of security has evolved
slowly to one incorporating all forms of security such as economic,
political, psychological, environmental and cultural security. Thus
when states or the international community act to promote development,
all these aspects of security should be addressed. Brig. Baly says
his government believes that security sector reforms should be people-oriented.
The British
expert thus emphasised the need for a system of proper management
of security resources and said that military is too dangerous to
be left to the generals alone. He said the new British policy called
for greater role for the public sector management and the civil
society in military affairs. In other words, the military should
function within a legal basis - not a law unto itself - and within
a democratic setup. This will ensure the formation of affordable
and appropriate armed forces and promote professionalism and transparency
while eliminating corruption and mismanagement. Security reforms
are also necessary to prevent the military from interfering in governmental
matters. Such interference has led to abuse, mismanagement and to
the diversion of scarce resources away from much needed investment
in social infrastructure in several developing countries in Asia
and Africa. All this is fine. Yes, there is a need for security
reforms in developing countries, including Sri Lanka.
The second question,
the British expert asked was that if there was a need for reform,
what should be the best approach. Well, the panacea for our ills
should be found within Sri Lanka itself. What is medicine for country
A could be poison for country B. Thus we need to identify the reform
areas and come out with the right solution.
At Thursday's
talk, some retired generals were heard complaining that they could
play a role but they were not sure whether their cry would make
any impact. Brig. Baly said the cry for security sector reforms
should come from the robust and confident civil society.
Tigers
back in Jaffna
"The
veterans of many battles are here"
When the head
of the Liberation Tigers' Arts and Cultural Organisation walked
onto the stage to address tens of thousands of people assembled
in the grounds of Jaffna University, the message was already clear
before his first words: the LTTE was very much back in Jaffna. In
a rousing speech, Puthuvai Ratnathurai, a recognised poet, drove
the point home in an address frequently interrupted by thunderous
applause.
Top:
a section of the 60,000 strong crowd (as claimed by the Tamil
Guardian, London)
|
"We stand
here in front of you today after six years of exile," he said.
"I see the masses of people I last saw at the Muthamil Vizha
in Muttraveli in 1990 and May Day 1991. I bow my head to the people
here." "I wish to deliver [LTTE leader Velupillai Pirapaharan's]
message of gratitude with you. On behalf of the Liberation Tigers,
I also thank the Jaffna University community for organising this
rally," he added. "Before l995, we shared in the happiness
and sadness of the people. Despite the economic blockade [on the
peninsula] and cuts in electricity there was joy in the faces of
our people. We collected tax, erected portraits; and the people
who accepted that with smiling faces are sullen faced today [under
Army occupation]."
"I am filled
with pride when I realise that our people have prepared them- selves
to determine their own destiny, and not let any one else make the
decisions for them. Today, standing at 3 the crest of the uprising
of a people that has seen them prepared to destroy [Sri Lanka] army
camps and push aside barbed wire road blocks, I will pass this message
to our leadership Vanni tomorrow.
"We accept
an interim administration for the Tamil areas in view of the suffering
of our people," Ratnathurai said. "We call upon youths
and technical experts from all fields to join us in rebuilding our
nation and its economy. This is the message from the leadership
of the Liberation Tigers on their Pongu Thamil day," he said.
"We have not come here to ask for election votes. We have come
to carry out political work in the new climate of the day. The veterans
of numerous battles, llamparuhty and Paappa, are here. They will
help solve the problems faced by our people. Mr. Ratnathurai said
that while Tamil Tigers were not entirely satisfied with the way
they had come to Jaffna [in reference to the present restriction
on numbers imposed by the ceasefire agreement], but had done so
based on their trust of the Sri Lanka government.
"This
is the last chance for the Sri Lankan government to establish a
permanent peace in the country by finding a honourable and just
political solution that could meet the legitimate aspirations of
Tamils," he said. Referring to the fragile nature of the peace
process, Mr. Ratnathurai said that the Sinhala people should realise
the last 'peace bus' was about to leave; and if they failed to get
on board they'll have to "face the Paandavas" (victors
in the great Baratha war in the epic Mahabarat). "We are for
peace. There can be no doubt about our stand in this regard. But
the government should take constructive steps to fulfil the aspirations
of Tamils when providing a political solution," he said. Mr.
Ratnathurai said that a video of the LTTE assault on Katunayake
airforce base and the adjoining international airport would soon
be released.
The LTTE has
never formally acknowledged responsibility for the devastating assault.
"We no longer wish to hide the truth as to who was responsible.
The entire Tamil people will soon take pride in the bravery and
daring of the Tamil Tigers who penetrated the stronghold of the
Sri Lanka Air Force." "We will dedicate the tape to President
Chandrika for her 'war for peace' and to Anuruddha [Ratwatte],"
he said to applause. - Tamil Guardian, London
|