Dangerous crossings
Public
still at risk
The General Manager, Railways, Priyal de Silva said there
are about 740 unprotected crossings throughout the country.
There are some difficulties because the railtrack was constructed
before the road at many points and there are obstructions
blocking the view. Boards have been put up at unprotected
crossings to warn motorists.
Mr. de
Silva explained that during President R. Premadasa's time,
on his orders bamboo barriers were put up at all unprotected
crossings and six temporary workers were employed by the respective
Divisional Secretariats to man them on a shift basis. However,
after some time it was found that these gatekeepers were often
not at their posts. Motorists who found the gates open, went
across believing it was safe. This led to an increase in accidents.
When Mrs.
Srimani Athulathmudali was Minister of Transport, a committee
appointed to study the issue suggested the removal of bamboo
gates where the traffic was not too heavy and prominent signboards
instead. Of the 740 unprotected crossings, barriers without
interlocking signals were put up at 130 last year. Two hundred
and fifty crossings with heavy traffic have been earmarked
for protective measures. Financial constraints are also a
major factor, he said.
There
are different types of barriers, Mr. de Silva said. Barriers
with the interlocking system operate the signals with the
barrier and cost about Rs. 1.5m. The bell and light system
works on a relay system. As the train approaches a certain
distance, the bell rings, the red light comes on and the barrier
is lowered. Although these are the best, it is not possible
to have them at every crossing. The Moratuwa University has
turned out some barriers with local materials at a lower cost.
About 30 have been done this year. But with many crossing
still ill- protected. The danger is ever present.
|
It was a miraculous
escape from death at the level crossing at Peralanda, Kandana on
Tuesday April, 23. Leslie Fernando, travelling in a car with his
young son, Yoshan and his friend Sanju, found the makeshift gate
at the crossing open. He did not see the gatekeeper. He drove his
car over the crossing with two rail tracks, which was higher than
the road. When the car was on the first track, he saw the gatekeeper
standing on the other side, holding up his hand for him to stop.
Thinking the train was approaching on the second track, Fernando
stopped the car. Then, to his horror, he saw the train approaching
on the track he was on. There was no time to cross the track or
reverse the vehicle.
He shouted to
the two children to jump out. "Yoshan, who was seated in the
front passenger seat screamed, opened his door and jumped out,"
Leslie Fernando recalls. "I saw Sanju opening his door behind
Yoshan. Then I too jumped out just in time. Seconds later, the train
smashed into the car. I ran and picked up Sanju who had fallen out
of the car." The car had been flung on to a clump of bushes
on the roadside. Fortunately, apart from a few bruises no one was
hurt. Looking at the state of the smashed up car, it was indeed
amazing that the passengers had survived.
"This crossing
is a very dangerous one," Fernando said. "During the last
two years, five accidents have taken place with two or three deaths.
It is better if there was no one to man the gate because then we
would be more cautious." The crossing is manned by two temporary
workers employed on a shift-basis by the local authority. They did
not seem to have any facilities. There was not even a red flag or
lamp. "When we see the further gate closed or hear the sound
of the train, we run to close the gate," said S.N.S.P. Dias
who was on duty when The Sunday Times visited the spot. Dias said
it was his colleague who had been on duty at the time of the accident.
The victims
of another rail crossing accident 11 days earlier at Katunayake
were not so fortunate, however. When the car driven by Godage Dhanapala
crashed into the train on the Katunayake airport road on April 12,
both he and his passenger, an Indian engineer were killed.
Moragodage Francis
Pinto, the gateman on duty said one of the barriers had been broken
that afternoon by a bus that had driven into it as it was being
lowered. The telephone line at the station had been cut due to the
non-payment of a bill less than Rs.1000. They had sent a message
about the broken gate to the railway authorities immediately, by
the next train. As there was no one to go to the police, the entry
had only been made the next day.
"After
the barrier was broken I used the red and green flags to signal
to the trains during the day and the red lamp after dark,"
Pinto said. "The alarm bell rings as the train approaches and
the traffic light at the crossing also turns red. The night of the
accident, at 8.50, the traffic signal was red and I was standing
by the broken gate, with a red lamp awaiting the train from Puttalam.
A row of vehicles had stopped behind the barrier on the other side.
A bus drove up and stopped, behind the broken barrier. A few other
vehicles parked behind the bus. Suddenly, a three-wheeler and a
car overtook the bus and drove through the crossing. The three-wheeler
made it safely but the train crashed into the left side of the car,
dragging it along for 59 metres. The Sub-Station Master informed
the Katunayake Police, who arrived within a few minutes."
Srinika Jayakody,
O.I.C. Traffic, Katunayake Police, said that when he went to the
scene the vehicle driver had already been sent to the Negombo Hospital.
They helped to take out the passenger and sent him also to the hospital,
where he was pronounced dead. Driver Dhanapala was transferred to
the Colombo National Hospital where he succumbed to his injuries.
Last year too a motorcycle had crashed into the train at this crossing,
resulting in the rider's death. Another one had crashed into the
train at the unprotected crossing close to the station.
"There
are several near misses at this crossing every day. Even though
the barriers are closed, vehicles try to beat the train," explained
Sub-Station Master Wesley Senasinghe.
Dhanapala's
young wife, Dilini, widowed at 31 years is devastated by her husband's
tragic death. The mother of Chathurike, 8, and Tharindu, just five
months old, Dilini is still in shock and has no idea how she will
cope. "He came home for the night the day before the accident,
with fried rice for Chathurika and a little key tag with a red light,"
Dilini weeps. "After the children were in bed, he sat and spoke
to me for about an hour. This is the time we tell each other all
that happened during the day. He left for work in the afternoon
the next day. He said he had to take a passenger to the airport
and would come home in the night. He gave me money to buy a dress
for our daughter for the New Year. He also told me he would be at
home for the New Year holidays."
Dilini was fast
asleep when the ominous knock on the door roused them at 1.30 a.m.
It was Dhanapala's employer, Suresh Jeyanayagam and his wife who
had come to break the news of the accident.
Dilini is grateful
to Dhanapala's employer who did everything for the funeral. She
says Dhanapala was a caring father. He did everything for her soon
after the birth of the baby, when she was unfit to do any work.
During their ten years of marriage they had some difficult times
when he was out of a job for three years but they managed to survive.
The distraught
widow appears to be in a sad plight. Dhanapala had not wanted her
to work so she has no experience to take up a job. She did not think
he was entitled to Provident Fund benefits except perhaps for five
years when he worked at LECO. "We have paid the rent on this
house until the end of June," Dilini said. "I haven't
thought of what to do or where to go after that."
It is tragic
that so many lives are disrupted by avoidable accidents. Shouldn't
railway crossings be made more secure to prevent motorists breaking
through the barriers? According to the railway authorities, there
have been 61 level crossing accidents including 27 deaths in 2001.
Fifteen of these accidents have been at protected crossings.
On the crash
at Kandana on Tuesday, a senior railway official said that the guards
at these unprotected crossings are paid by the Social Services Department
and the responsibility lies with the local authorities. "The
protected crossings are our responsibility but the local authorities
have to take the responsibility for unprotected crossings."
|