NGO
dialogue on 'poverty reduction' and peace
The Ministry of Finance will submit a document in June this year,
describing a plan of economic and social development called a poverty
reduction strategy (PRS) for funding by international donors. This
document, which runs into about 200 pages, is a set of detailed projects
and programs, beginning in 2002. Civil society and NGO members were
assembled in the BMICH on 8th May to give their comments and recommendations
on this document which has been prepared by the state. The NGOs and
their representatives consisted of Pauline McKeown, Mohamed Mahroof,
Subaitha Ansar, Sepali Kottegoda, M.F.Marikkar, Susil Siriwardene,
A Kiriwandeniya and Wilfrid Jayasuriya.
For the purpose
of this article, to give the reported discussion some shape, I introduce
a mythical mediator, Socrates, who was not present on the scene.
What he speaks may be relevant but not necessarily a record of anything
said by anybody there.
Kiriwandeniya:
I spent 3 days in the Wanni recently. Ours is a cooperative network
with 8000 primaries, 2000 in the N&E. Sanasa funding, unlike
Sarvodaya_s, is internally generated. The N&E has been the scene
of the best coops in the past like the producer coops for subsidiary
foodcrops. When we visited Kilinochi it took half a day_s dialog,
to break the ice with the LTTE. They were willing to listen and
talk
Socrates: Would you be able, by linking up coops, facilitate a freer
flow of produce both ways?
Mahroof: To
implement relief, rehabilitation and reconciliation there are 13
different agencies on the scene. Susil : Jayalath Jayawardene_s
ministry of R&R must play the role of leading agency. Not merely
allocate the roles but have the executive authority over the 13,
to make them do what R&R wants.
Kiriwandeniya:
One cannot talk of the scene as a resettlement program. It is a
post war recovery plan like the Marshall Plan that is required.
There has been the movement of Tamil refugees from Jaffna to the
Wanni. Then there has been the movement of Muslim and Sinhala refugees
from the Wanni to the refugee camps further south .
Socrates: To
take them back or to find alternative places for resettlement?
Pauline: Rationalisation and clarity of management is critical in
handling such sensitive problems. Will the LTTE be consulted in
management? If not RRR will be a remedy worse than the decease.
Socrates: Perhaps an interim administration will solve the problem
of LTTE participation.
Pauline: Basic
services in the war torn areas have to be strengthened. The example
that hits the eye is the A 9. But there is a tremendous amount to
be done. For the last 6 years infrastructure development of Jaffna
was not permitted. Now that will have to be done. A great deal of
construction activity must take place. Will the benefits of such
activity, the wealth that is generated thereby, be made available
to the N&E? Will the Sinhalese forego a part of what they long
to earn and give it to the Tamils, who live there?
Socrates: The
dispute over bus transport on the A 9 is simply a question of distributing
the wealth that will be generated. Ethnic conflict is very much
a fight over resource distribution. See how the PA, the JVP and
others are protesting against the ADB for talking with the LTTE,
when in Chandrika_s draft constitution, the devolved areas were
entitled to negotiate foreign aid independently. Tamils have been
left out of the Mahaveli and the general development of the country
and have been made the poorest community. Will equality be restored
through RR and R? Mahroof:
undamental rights
issues for refugees will be such as titles to land, birth certificates,
exam certificates etc, which they have lost. If government organizations,
such as the registrar general, follow usual procedures suitable
for stable communities in peace time no documents will be forthcoming.
Susil: I expect that is the purpose of having an interim administration
dominated by the LTTE.
Wilfrid: The
PRS official document also says, _new schools in mixed ethnic areas
to be multiethnic _ and _expand English education to develop a bridge
language._ Sri Lankan feelings of separateness and ethnicity has
been consolidated by creating language streams, which was a deliberate
divisive device. An important policy step to create harmony is to
amend the Education Act of 1961, passed in Mrs B_s days, with Badiudin
Mahmud as Education Minister, which created the division and prevented
unity.
Socrates: Minister
G.L Peries lamented that fact publicly when he opened an international
colloquium on Commonwealth Writing in the 1990s. And even in this
document, the state is trying to solve the problem of separation
only in the N&E, when in the south, it is endemic. The clever
young JVP men in Parliament, are the product of the language streaming
policy of 1961. That policy must give way to an optional language
policy, allowing the student_s choice in one or more media_English,
Sinhala and Tamil.
Susil: And a
new vision must emerge in education. When Black integration took
place in the 60s, in USA, it was accompanied by a whole revision
of curricula. New courses on Black culture and history were introduced
and existing terms, which denigrated Blacks were phased out.
Socrates: _Old
Black Joe_ is a song unknown to the black students in USA. Of course
we also have the same syndrome of rewriting history saying the colonial
past must be rewritten to suit modern tastes. So Robert Knox, whose
views on government are surprisingly modern, as well as Leonard
Woolf_s dramatization of village life, must be categorized as colonial
and downgraded. There are pros and cons for all that.
Pauline: Over the last couple of decades or more the NGOs such as
_Save the Children_ have been been conducting the same programs.
Socrates: They
have largely been remedial rather than positive? Pauline: Should
NGO programs now change? Socrates: As Mahroof said, what we have
now is a post war recovery scenario.
Pauline: But
will NGOs get the same environment in which to operate in the LTTE
controlled areas? We will be in an environment of child soldiers
when we are spearheading the rights of children. Sepalika: Already
there is news that women are being told to wear a certain kind of
clothing. Like a sari and not trousers.
Kiriwandeniya: One can object to that. But one can always argue
that these are ways of preserving the symbolic unity of an oppressed
community. It is necessary to preserve that sense of unity if such
a community were to forge ahead.
Socrates: A good example is the Muslim community in Sri Lanka, which
has adopted a style of dress for women quite unsuited for this climate,
but which proclaims they are Muslim.
Subaitha: There
is also extortion. A businessman was forced to pay Rs40,000/ recently.
We should include in the program that such things should be forbidden.
Sepalika: My major criticism of this document is that except for
four pages, where specific reference is made to women, the rest
of the document talks about _people._ Who are these people? Are
they men or women? Insufficent attention is given to the issues
of women as women.
Marikkar: To
come to the major theme of RRR, when resettlement takes place it
is not enough to take the people back and ask them to settle down.
Schools and clinics must be built for them in the resettlement area.
Susil: Wilfrid, you and I both ex land men. We were involved in
resettlement in new irrigated areas and know how those things were
done. I feel that we must have a participatory approach. Refugees
must participate in building their own houses and communities.
Wilfrid: Apart
from the specific matters raised in this document, which we have
addressed, I feel there are general issues, which need to be raised
to make these programs successful. One of them is to create a new
non government media organization, which can respond to all the
negative points of view canvassed all the time by voices, which
see peace from various negative angles. No doubt it is a political
issue but peace is too important to all the citizens of this country
to be left to the politicians. Civil society or NGOs or whoever
must find a mechanism to counter the uproar that is created in the
existing media, serving certain limited points of view such as family
and ethnicity. An enormous majority voted for peace.
The existing media, not only here but in countries like USA too,
find great value in creating news and noise, which upsets peace.
After all CNN reports only disasters.
|