Quota
saga-what happened to transparency?
Are we reviving memories of the garment quota saga that was exposed
by this newspaper last year? There were many sour faces when The
Sunday Times spoke of the corrupt deals that took place then in
quotas issued by the Textile Quota Board (TQB). News is surfacing
once again about alleged corruption in the distribution of quotas.
Charges and counter-charges are flying in the face of ministers
G.L. Peiris and Rohitha Bogollagama who are in charge of the subject
of industry and garments.
It appears that
Bogollagama, an industries minister of non-cabinet rank, has opened
a can of worms through accusations of corrupt practice because his
request to the TQB for quotas was turned down by officials.
Angry industrialists
blame ministers for interfering in the quota process which is decided
by the TQB board. But TQB officials are also being accused of taking
administrative decisions they should not have made, without consulting
the board which includes representatives of the industry.
The whole drama
stinks and raises the all-important issue that the United National
Party government has been plugging away while in opposition - transparency.
That seems to be sadly forgotten not only in the quota saga but
also in some other deals in which ministers have been reprimanded
by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe.
The lack of transparency in tenders, contracts and simple government
decisions has been further aggravated by conflicting roles of ministers
and overlapping duties. The reality is that there are too many ministers
with the UNP having to eat its words about promises of a small cabinet.
The cabinet may be nowhere the size of the one appointed during
the former People's Alliance regime but that's because appointments
have been couched in UNP doublespeak.
There are project ministers and also a 'minister assisting'. Where
on earth did these designations come from? Is it all for the sake
of serving the people or serving oneself? According to the Information
Department's "Guide to Ministries" booklet giving important
addresses and contact numbers, there are 59 ministers and a similar
number of ministries!
Overlapping
of functions is a problem. The tussle in the subject of industries
is growing with key personalities waiting for the return of the
prime minister to settle the issue. Conflicts are emerging between
President Chandrika Kumaratunga, ministers Karunasena Kodituwakku
and Kabeer Hasheem; between S.B. Dissanayake and Ravi Karunanayake
on imports, and many others. There are many ministers handling education
so much so that it wouldn't be surprising if a new project minister
is assigned to handle kindergarten affairs!
With duties
not being properly assigned - particularly when ministers handle
similar subjects - there are bound to be problems like the situation
the two ministers were placed in earlier this year when Bogollagama
claimed the BOI was under his control until Wickremesinghe stepped
in and ordered it should be handled by Peiris.
Bogollagama by ordering TQB officials seems to have gone beyond
his brief but the issues that he is raising - whether because of
a personal agenda or not - need to be addressed properly.
Something is
wrong if allegations keep surfacing in the granting of quotas. This
wouldn't happen if the process is transparent. Is there a need for
a new system? No, given the fact that quotas would vanish by 2005.
Then what are
the safeguards that are needed? A UNP watchdog committee comprising
possibly retired judges should be appointed to probe public complaints
of interference by government ministers. Wickremesinghe needs to
crack the whip and make sure ministers mind their own business.
On the quota
saga, a government statement must be issued to set things right
instead of leaving room for wild speculation that could discourage
even foreign buyers.
Economic
challenges ahead
By Merrill Cassell
Having travelled to more than 50 countries I have not seen a country
as beautiful as Sri Lanka. In spite of the beauty of Sri Lanka,
on another comparison, I have not seen a country deteriorate so
visibly as Sri Lanka has. Sadly though, the long civil war has been
the major contributor to the decay of the country.
Going back to
the 1950's is going back to paradise. Then came the demise in the
late 1950's and thereafter. The rapid nationalisation of the language
and business of the country was the primary cultural and economic
disaster.
Government took
over the major portions of the private sector at a very rapid pace
and those government industries were inefficient. Some stunning
examples were that projects completed by government run corporations
were taking 5-6 times longer than before (private sector era) and
there was big cost overruns. Government just got too big.
Privatising
the public sector was a very good move, but in some ways that privatisation
was overdone, notably, the bus transportation in Colombo and other
parts of the country. In those good old days, the bus service provided
by the Ceylon Transport Board (CTB) was an example par excellence
of a public good.
However, when that public good was denationalised, the Galle Road
became crowded with thousands of small vehicles.
Cluttered traffic
In other words, 20-30 smaller vehicles plying the narrow stretch
of Galle Road now replaced one double decker load. This is one of
the major reasons now why the Galle Road is cluttered with traffic.
Since there are no strict emission controls in the country, it is
common to see vehicles spew black smoke that increases the intensity
of the pollution. In the 1970s, the late James Grant (former Executive
Director of UNICEF) published a book on the Physical Quality of
Life Index (PQLI).
Basically, that statistical study attempted to take three social
indicators: literacy, life expectancy and infant mortality and mold
it into one static, the PQLI.
The PQLI attempted to see how the variables related to the per capita
Gross National Product (GNP). For instance, in the period 1970-75
Kuwait had a per capita GNP of $13,787 and a PQLI of 75. On the
other hand, Sri Lanka with an average GNP of only $179 had a PQLI
of 82.
The late James
Grant was always proud of the fact that Sri Lanka, with such limited
resources was able to achieve the highest levels of literacy, life
expectancy and the lowest levels of infant mortality.
This index,
though it appears to be simple as it sounds, showed that Sri Lanka
with limited resources was yet able to match the rest of the world
with some very important key social indicators. Obviously, Sri Lanka
had some superior development planning and practices. With the nation
in turmoil (civil war), it will be very difficult to see tangible
progress in the development of Sri Lanka.
It should be
hoped that in the new millennium the parties concerned (government
and others) would find an amicable solution to restore peace, tranquillity
and prosperity to this once-upon-a-time, beautiful nation.
Peace in Sri
Lanka and the end of the civil war will help government and all
private citizens to get the country back to prosperity again. In
tandem to reaching settlement of the civil war, Sri Lanka should
also have to focus its attention to development programmes to benefit
the population. Population growth and population densities pose
serious threats to the living standards of Sri Lankans.
The transfer of resources for programmes to benefit mankind to those
of the civil war has undercut the rise in the per capita GNP.
Big challenges
The Sri Lanka government no doubt has a big challenge ahead. After
bringing peace and harmony (end of civil war) the government should
enact measures (conducive to all parties) to avoid a resurgence
of the disease (civil war).
Other primary
policies would be growth and to avoid policies that impede growth.
The government will have to continue to increase the quality of
the labour force, enhance capital accumulation and slow population
growth for its path to progress.
Sri Lanka already has an edge over many other developing countries
because of its high literacy rates. With the devastation of the
country, Sri Lanka will need a lot of aid. Sri Lanka would need
loans and grants to further improve its labour force (technical
training, apprenticeships, etc.), accumulate capital and increase
the efficiencies and effectiveness of the production process.
Foreign aid
alone cannot help Sri Lanka. The government must establish an economic
climate that is favorable to capital accumulation (local and foreign
entrepreneurs alike).
Then the government
will have to rebuild the infrastructure, schools, roads, sanitary
and water supply, power plants, cement factories, communication
and transportation and other agricultural and scientific facilities
and so on.
All this will
have to be substituted with imports of much needed raw, semi-finished
and finished materials of equipment and spare parts for all sectors
of industry. Sri Lanka ought to upgrade the quality of its labour
force so that more raw materials could be converted to finished
products within the country for added job creation and economic
prosperity.
Given a stable
economic and political climate, a higher proportion of technical
assistance will flow to Sri Lanka, bilaterally from industrialised
countries and through the World Bank and United Nations Organisations.
Donor countries have limited resources as they must also keep aside
money for the many problems facing their own nations.
As there are
so many problems in developing countries and limited donor money,
developing countries must compete to receive aid. The degree of
competition is such the recipient country must be able to substantiate
that aid is used as intended and without waste of resources. The
responsibility of donors is great. Donors have to ensure that their
hard-earned money is put to best use.
In addition
to promoting peace and stability, the government will need to give
top priority to the rebuilding of its road network and communication
network, as this infrastructure will greatly contribute to efficiency.
Among many other
sectors, Sri Lanka would need a lot of town planning to ease traffic
congestion and pollution and improve the cleanliness of its environment.
An underground subway system in Colombo would be an ideal public
good but unfortunately that can be very expensive and may not be
the highest priority, given limited resources.
Other lesser
expensive ways would be for the government to provide transportation
as a public good and use the price system to discourage parking
in central parts of Colombo.
With its limited
resources, economists in Sri Lanka will have to help the government
in establishing its priorities. Sri Lanka would require top notch
town planning, including a master plan for the whole country. It
would be wise to seek the assistance of the United Nations Development
Programme and the World Bank for a project of this magnitude.
You throw a
seed anywhere in Sri Lanka and a tree will grow. With such a fertile
climate and a literate population, it is only peaceful co-existence
and good governance that will guarantee economic prosperity for
Sri Lanka into the new millennium.
(The writer
is a Sri Lankan and former Budget Director at the UN Children's
Fund (UNICEF) in New York).
From
log cabin to Bank House - N.U. Jayawardena
By Stanley P. Wickramaratne Ex-Central Banker, I948 - I984
During the Second World War (I939 - I945) and its aftermath Sri
Lanka had to sustain a plethora of 'controls' which regulated the
supply of foods and services and in general the free mobility of
its citizens.
These restrictions
were departmentalised by the State and named Food Control, Textile
Control, Rubber Control, Tea Control, Milk Food Control, Petrol
Control, Poonac Control, Price Control and the still-kicking Import-Export
and Exchange Control. With the grant of independence in I948, these
control mechanisms gradually ceased to function except the last
two mentioned.
Among the many
public servants that headed some of these departments was N. U.
Jayawardena at Exchange Control. He also served as Assistant Secretary
to the Pochkanawala Banking Commission with Dr. B. B. Das Gupta
on it. This was his stepping-stone to higher and responsible achievements
in the public service as well as becoming a somewhat controversial
visionary in the private sector. As Controller of Exchange he closely
associated himself with Reserve Bank Adviser John Exter in the preparation
of draft legislation for the setting up of the Central Bank of Ceylon.
The recent loss to our nation of Neville Ubesinghe Jayawardena at
the ripe old age of ninety-four prompts the writer to enlighten
the general public about N. U. Jayawardena, the man under whom the
writer served during some exciting times as his Personal Assistant.
Young Jayawardena
excelled in his studies at St. Aloysius College, Galle. After matriculation
he joined the General Clerical Service and served in many departments
including the Registrar General's Office and later as Head of the
Department of Commodity Purchase. While in service he graduated
in Economics and was appointed by the Public Service Commission
in the mid-I940s to head the Department of Exchange Control. He
possessed a charismatic personality and was a workaholic to the
very extreme who extracted from his subordinates maximum work output
irrespective of whether it was day or night, a weekend or a public
holiday. Nevertheless, his late wife Margaret Jayawardena, cared
for him with great compassion and understanding and blessed him
with three lovely children - two sons - Lal and Nimal and daughter
Neeliya.
Exchange
restrictions
During the period I945 to July I950 exchange restrictions waxed
and waned in keeping with the quantum of sterling accumulated in
the United Kingdom during the Second World War.
So was the hiring
and firing of the staff who manned the department of Exchange Control
- with restrictions the staff multiplied and when controls were
relaxed the staff contracted. By I950 when the Central Bank took
over the administration of this once-temporary department of the
Ministry of Finance, most of our sterling assets had been depleted
by withdrawals made under the Bretton Woods agreement on the many
annual pilgrimages the then-Minister of Finance, J. R. Jayewardene,
undertook to London in the company of his competent Controller of
Exchange, N. U. Jayawardena. One can now only guess that these withdrawals
were in no way channelled towards any visible economic development
of the country but largely utilised for servicing the import of
consumer goods which the average citizen could have easily done
without. N. U. Jayawardena also lent his services and invaluable
advice to many Ministers of State who knew little of the state of
the economy. He was also a constant invitee of the then-Minister
for Transport Sir John Kotelawala and used to share a sumptuous
morning breakfast of egg hoppers at the latter's spacious Kandawala
residence. Sir John at that time was reported in the press to be
negotiating for the purchase of some valuable property in Kent,
England. This association was somewhat of a bad omen for N. U. Jayawardena
as events proved later.
N. U. Jayawardena's
assumption of office in I950 as the first Ceylonese Governor of
the Central Bank of Ceylon (i.e. on the eve of Governor John Exter's
return to his office at the Federal Reserve in Washington) was preceded
with much behind-the-scenes activity by certain interested parties.
Many aspirants eyed this coveted position while others in the public
service canvassed against Jayawardena.
Among the numerous messages of congratulations Jayawardena received
it was ironical to find some letters of expression of faith and
good wishes from those very high personalities who openly canvassed
against his nomination. It is now history that Jayawardena's term
of office was short lived (1953) due to a combination of unfavourable
circumstances but by no means to any incompetence on his part.
Costly dinner
The preamble was a dinner hosted by the then Prime Minister Sir
John Kotelawala (1953-1956) in honour of the visiting Governor Cobbold
of the Bank of England. This occasion led to the appointment of
a Commission of Inquiry into the life and conduct of N. U. Jayawardena.
Sir John's outburst at this dinner, "I say N. U. I hear that
you have made money through dubious means", and Jayawardena's
candid rejoinder, "Look Sir John, as Governor of the Central
Bank, I can under the provisions of the Exchange Control Act ask
you to reveal your assets abroad," elicited from N. W. Atukorale,
Secretary to the Prime Minister, the statement, "I say N. U.
you have cooked your goose."
The writer,
with the assistance of another colleague, had the most unpleasant
task of finding a safe conduct for Jayawardena from his Governor's
desk at the bank in the Times Building to his official residence
in Colombo 7. While the entire media including, Rienzie Wijeratne,
the Lake House photographer were anxiously waiting for his exit
we managed to smuggle him through the back of the Times Building.
On the Commission's findings and his subsequent vacation of post
of Governor, the writer vividly recalls calling on him at his official
residence to take charge of his official belongings such as his
brief case and umbrella. This was a heart-breaking encounter. In
the presence of Margaret Jayawardena, the writer announced the purpose
of the visit and in passing added that he was so sorry to see him
in this position after having attained one of the highest positions
in the land. Mrs. Jayawardena then burst into tears and hugged the
writer. But N.U. Jayawardena, clad in his 'palaycut' sarong and
bare-bodied, looked so calm and collected when he said: "My
dear chap, you now say that to me but you wait and see, I shall
return soon and hit the headlines again!"
In appeal under
the SLFP regime, Jayawardena was exonerated from the findings of
the Commission. One must add at this juncture that he had the confidence
and support of our then representative at the United Nations, R.S.S.
Gunawardena, who incidentally was best man at the wedding of S.W.R.D.
Bandaranaike to Sirimavo Ratwatte.
It is pertinent
to mention that Jayawardena's exit from the Central Bank in 1953
gave him some breathing space for soul searching and until such
time the findings and his appeal against the findings of the Commission
against him were over, he established some kind of rapport with
the Gods by an act of self-abasement. Towards this end it was said
he spent much time sweeping with a broom the large Buddhist temple
premises in Moratuwa clad only in a loincloth (amude)!
Exonerated
After he was exonerated, he visited London and returned home with
the Chairmanship of Vavassuer and Company in his pocket. This company
dealt with the export of coconut products and fibre. He also established
Colombo Agencies with many subsidiaries. Both these companies collapsed
in a matter of a few years and NUJ's image in the private sector
took a dive until such time Mercantile Credit Ltd emerged as a stable
finance company with a chain of subsidiaries with immediate members
of his family and in-laws on its directorate. A few years later
with the co-operation of two prominent Buddhists - Walter Wimalachandra
and optician Albert Edirisinghe - he set up the Sampath Bank. When
the Sampath Bank, after much procrastination on the part of the
Monetary Board of the Central Bank, was finally permitted to open
its doors as an authorised dealer, the wisdom of authorising the
establishment of a commercial bank with a religious stance agitated
the public mind. Nevertheless, Sampath Bank with a limited but highly
paid staff played a vibrant role in commercial banking at a time
the other two indigenous banks - the Bank of Ceylon and the People's
Bank - were facing insolvency. The People's Bank was soon turning
into a "some People's Bank" while the Bank of Ceylon management
caved into accommodate wheeler dealers in business by the grant
of unlimited over-draft facilities purely on the threatening recommendation
of corrupt politicians without any collateral whatsoever.
With the collapse
of a number of finance companies in the late 1980s and early 1990s,
Mercantile Credit had to enlarge its directorate with representatives
from the People's Bank, Bank of Ceylon and the Central Bank with
an injection of Rs. 750 million towards a rehabilitation programme.
The writer was the recipient of the following short message from
N.U. Jayawardena in a letter dated 30th January 1992:
'I have read your recent comments with great interest. You would
have by now learnt that I have also severed my connection with Mercantile
Credit Ltd. So have Nimal and other members of the family which
I think is what the Governor wanted to achieve. "It may well
be that he may have over reached himself in certain respects, but
events will shortly tell."
Tripped over
As predicted, events did tell. The then Governor one fine day "tripped
over" Neliya Perera's barbed wire fence in her Nuwara Eliya
property thus having to face a charge of criminal trespass in our
courts of law which culminated in his conviction and the loss of
his civic rights. N.U. Jayawardena served on many committees set
up by the Government of that day. He had a wide vision for a better
Sri Lanka. He also served as Chairman of the Committee appointed
by the state, called 'bureaucratic processes committee', to report
on the hassle which the public experience in dealing with the bureaucracy.
In fairness to him, one had to put his mind at rest when he confessed,
"I could have served the country better if I continued as Governor
of the Central Bank except that materially I would not have benefited."
I had to convey the following message to him in the mid 1990s:
"My dear Sir, ... What are the material benefits which would
have benefited you? Are they in any way related to money? Then I
would say - money can buy you an expensive dog but you cannot buy
the wag of its tail. Be that as it may, I think one should seriously
consider, as the years go by, of hanging up one's gloves and retiring
without resigning from life. Even in the field of cricket many a
veteran are known to have faltered at the crease under the strain
of a long innings. It is said that "visionaries are possessed
creatures, men and women in the thrall of belief so powerful that
they ignore all else - even reason - to ensure that reality catches
up with their dreams."
|