Educating
Rocca - now at a Centre near you!
Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe ad mitted, that "discrimination
against Tamils spurred militancy in Sri Lanka'', according to dispatches
from the US.
"Whatever
the causes, the result is the LTTE'', he has told scholars at the
Woodrow Wilson International Centre. But the Prime Minister also
told the US press that the US government's cutting off of the international
flow of funds after Sptember 11 forced the LTTE to "sue for
peace.''
He also said
that "affirmative action programs'' that were intended for
the upliftment of the Sinhala community alienated the Tamils.
'Affirmative
action' is distinctly of American coinage. They say now in the US
that "there could have been reverse discrimination caused to
the whites as a result of affirmative action programmes in favour
of the blacks." Affirmative action for blacks consisted of
granting certain quotas for instance, in education and in employment
for people who are of Afro-American descent who had been discriminated
against since the days of slavery in the early epoch of the American
union.
Can there be
affirmative action in favour of a majority? The Sinhalese are a
majority, and there can be no affirmative action in favour of the
Sinhalese unless the Sinhalese themselves were the community that
was underprivileged - - or in the status of minority, in a technical
sense.
Apparently,
then, going on the PM's rationalization, the Sinhala only policy
constituted of affirmative action - and policies of standardization
consisted of "affirmative action'' on behalf of the Sinhalese.
It is difficult to fathom what really weighed on the Premier's mind
when he spoke to the Woodrow Wilson scholars. But he did say that
"whatever the causes the result was the LTTE.''
But this juxtaposed
with his assertion that " the LTTE sued for peace when its
funds were cut-off due to US action after September 11'' somehow
places his two explanations about the conflict and its resolution
at certain odds. Scholars or not, Americans whether of the Woodrow
Wilson Centre or outside it, must be confused.
If the LTTE
was the result of "discrimination resulting from affirmative
action'' the LTTE should have received the support of the international
community. But no, the LTTE is "suing for peace'' because the
US cut off funds for its sustenance after September 11.
If there is
"reverse discrimination'' in America caused these days to whites
due to "affirmative action'' for the blacks, should that justify
a white uprising against the minority blacks in America? If the
question sounds odd, it is odd because of the simple reason that
it is hard to turn "affirmative action'' on the flip side.
Ranil Wickremesinghe
has turned "affirmative action'' on the flip side. He has said
that affirmative action on behalf of the majority enraged the Tamils,
driving them to war - indeed to a campaign of terror.
Why a campaign
of terror? Because Ranil Wickremesinghe himself says so, when he
concedes that America withdrew the LTTE's sources of sustenance
after September 11 which is the day that marks one of the world's
worst acts of terror.
One can redress
the grievances of a minority with affirmative action. But, the majority
can demand that its own rightful place be reinstated, as it happened
in apartheid South Africa. Dismantling apartheid in South Africa
was certainly not characterized anywhere as a case of "affirmative
action.'' Redressing the grievances of the Sinhala majority after
a long period of oppression and relative discrimination by a colonial
power, was similarly not "affirmative action''. Affirmative
action implies that the natural order of merit is tampered with
for a good cause.
For example
this happens when blacks in the US are reserved quotas in the job
market. But no such natural order of merit was tampered when the
rights of the Sinhala majority were restored to them after independence,
for example by ensuring that the Sinhalese had proper representation
in the administrative service, proportionate to their numbers. These
comments are written immediately after news dispatches were received
from Washington this week.
Other interested observers will no doubt, with time, provide more
analytical insights into the PM's latest explanations about Sri
Lanka's crisis.
|