Hakeem
partly wins the day
Despite recent newspaper headlines point
ing to a UNF-PA compromise, all's not
well with Sri Lanka's cohabitation poli tics.
Both President
Chandrika Kumaratunga and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe have
conveyed to each other that there won't be any major change in their
respective positions with regard to the proposed constitutional
amendment, which seeks to restrict the presidential power to dissolve
parliament.
President Kumaratunga
feels that certain provisions in the proposed amendment, especially
the clauses that permit a conscience vote, could disintegrate her
party. Presidential advisors have pointed out that the conscience
vote clause could creep into other bills also in the backdrop of
a threat to dissolve parliament. This could create a scenario where
PA MPs will be voting for UNF-sponsored bills, leading to a gradual
disintegration of the multi-party system.
The President
had apparently taken this advice seriously and wanted to have a
one-to-one meeting with the Prime Minister on Tuesday. At this meeting,
the President reiterated her position, saying she was opposed to
piecemeal abolition of the executive presidency and her party was
in favour of the total abolition of that all-powerful office.
The Prime Minister
told the President that the UNF cabinet would like to hear her views
on the proposed amendment when she came for Wednesday's meeting.
The President responded saying that she had not got sufficient time
to go through the draft. The President also said that she could
not come up with alternative proposals since her focus was on the
abolition of the executive presidency in its entirety. She told
the Prime Minister that she had prepared a draft for the abolition
of the executive presidency and it could be presented as the 19th
amendment.
Like many political
observers, the President is also uncertain whether the government
could muster the required two-thirds majority in parliament. But
the general consensus among the party stalwarts is that the PA should
agree to a compromise.
If the PA votes
en bloc with the government on the 19th Amendment then the provision
on the conscience vote becomes redundant and the government should
drop it, a PA leader told this column.
The committee
appointed by the President to look into the 19th Amendment has,
however, advised that the amendment should be amended in line with
the President's assurance to the Speaker that she would not dissolve
parliament as long as the ruling party commands a parliamentary
majority. At the same time, the committee also opposed the clause,
which said that Parliament could dissolve itself through a resolution.
According to
the PA proposals, the President is precluded from dissolving Parliament
when the government enjoys the confidence of Parliament and that
can only be tested through a vote in Parliament.
The relevant
extracts of the President's letter to the Speaker are as follows:
"When
a person is elected a member of Parliament at a general election
he or she is entitled, along with the general body of electors in
the country, to expect that Parliament will run its full term of
six years.
"These
are reasonable expectations shared by the whole country and its
citizenry which we are all committed to serve. Members of Parliament
are elected after a strenuous and usually expensive campaign. The
machinery of government is under heavy strain during an election
campaign.
"We have
witnessed in recent years, all too sadly, that our elections have
been preceded and followed by a degree of violence unworthy of a
people who have had the benefit of universal franchise for nearly
three quarters of a century. A general election could cost almost
a billion rupees, which our country can ill afford to spend. Election
campaigns have become over the years acrimonious and bitter. They
divide and polarise our society.
"A pending
general election causes confusion and uncertainty for our business
sector and for foreign governments and enterprises which wish to
deal with the government. The decision to dissolve Parliament prematurely
is one taken in the interests of the whole nation, with due care
and caution and a due sense of responsibility. I am fully conscious
of these constitutional duties and obligations.
"The Commissions
established under the 17th Amendment to the Constitution have not
yet been established, The National Police Commission and the Election
Commission, in particular, should be given time to function effectively
before any General Election could be contemplated.
"In the
present context, the dissolution of Parliament could have unexpected
and unforeseeable effects on the peace process and jeopardise its
beneficial results at a time when the thoughts of all political
parties should be focussed on the question of prime national importance,
that of bringing the ethnic conflict in our country to a close in
a peaceful manner with a just and durable solution which satisfies
the aspirations of all our people in our multi-ethnic, multi-religious
society.
"I believe
that, above all, the people of our country need a respite from the
hurly-burly of national elections. We have had a Presidential Election
and two General Elections in less than three years.
"In a
parliamentary system of government a dissolution of Parliament before
the expiry of its stipulated period usually takes place when the
government of the day loses its majority and faces defeat on the
floor of the House on a no confidence motion or on an important
financial bill such as the Budget, and it is found to be impossible
to constitute a new government from among the members of the existing
Parliament Today the Prime Minister and the Cabinet appointed after
the General Election held on December 5, 2001 appear to enjoy a
working majority in Parliament.
"Taking
into account all the facts and circumstances to which I have referred,
by virtue of the powers vested in me by article 32(3) of the Constitution
under which the President of the Republic has the right to send
messages to Parliament, I wish to inform the Members of the 12th
Parliament, and through them the people of Sri Lanka, that I shall
not dissolve the present Parliament unless the party which presently
commands the confidence of the House loses its majority and an alternative
government cannot be formed from among the members of the present
Parliament."
At the UNP's
working committee meeting on Monday night, Minister K.N. Choksy
urged the members to seriously study the PA's proposal. He drew
the working committee's attention to the President's address at
the SLFP's annual convention in Kandy where she indicated that the
PA would be agreeable to the amendment if the time frame was restricted
to two years instead of UNF's three years.
"We should
consider this seriously because the interpretation of the Supreme
Court could go either way," he said. Minister Tilak Marapana,
a one-time Attorney General, endorsed Mr. Choksy's view.
Mr. Choksy is
expected to meet former Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar to
work on a compromise formula as regards the amendment.
Earlier, several
UNF ministers met Mr. Kadirgamar to solicit the PA's support for
the 19th Amendment.
Most observers
feel that a compromise formula is likely because parliamentarians
from both sides are not ready to face an election right now. Most
of the MPs are of the view that a general election at this juncture
is unimaginable because of the huge campaign cost involved.
In the circumstances
it is most likely that many PA MPs would agree to restrict the President's
power on dissolution, taking cover behind the President's communication
to the Speaker, provided the UNF agrees to drop the conscience vote
clause which bars a party from taking disciplinary action against
its MPs who defy the party whip. At Wednesday's meeting of ministers,
Defence Minister Tilak Marapana announced that the gazette notification
lifting the ban on LTTE would be issued at midnight.
He said that
the ban would be lifted temporarily to facilitate September 16 talks
between the government and the LTTE in Sattahip, Thailand.
Mr. Marapana
said the ban would be lifted under the powers vested in him as the
Minister of Defence.
Earlier Foreign
Minister Tyronne Fernando queried the Prime Minister as to whether
a Cabinet decision would be taken to that effect. But the Prime
Minister told the ministers that it was not necessary since there
was no state of emergency in force. He said that the Defence Minister
could do it under the powers vested in him.
The President,
who did not turn up for that meeting, has opposed the move since
she holds the view that it should be done only when the talks reach
a progressive stage.
In an apparent
bid to show her dissent, President gave a warm welcome to a delegation
of Buddhist monks who oppose the lifting of the ban. The lifting
of the ban has given rise to a legal dispute over who has the authority
to do that.
Attorney General
K.C. Kamalasabeyson defended the government's position saying that
the Defence Minister had powers to lift the ban since the proscription
was effected under the Prevention of Terrorism Act.
The initial
ban in January 1998 came through a presidential proclamation under
the Public security Ordinance when the country was under a state
of emergency. The ban was later extended under the PTA.
But Presidential
advisors claimed that legally, the President could stop the deproscription
move while Sihala Urumaya leader Tilak Karunaratne said the only
way she could do that was by taking over the defence portfolio.
Meanwhile, SLMC
leader Rauff Hakeem during his discussion with LTTE chief negotiator
Anton Balasingham on Tuesday in London, managed to clinch a deal
whereby Muslim interest would be represented at the peace talks.
According to
the deal, Mr. Hakeem would participate at the first round of the
talks as a member of the government delegation but at subsequent
talks, he would participate as the leader of the Sri Lanka Muslim
Congress, thus representing the Muslim voice, making the peace talks
a tripartite exercise.
The London meeting
took place following a request made by Minister Hakeem to the Norwegian
facilitators. The initial arrangement was to meet both LTTE leader
Velupillai Prabhakaran and Dr. Balasingham in the Wanni, but this
could not be done because of a delay in Dr. Balasingham's arrival
in Wanni owing to logistical problems.
Hakeem received
a call from the Norwegian embassy in Colombo on Friday August 30
informing him that the meeting would take place on September 3.
By then Cabinet
Spokesman G.L. Peiris had already told the media that Hakeem would
be a member of the government delegation at peace talks. The announcement
came amidst calls from the SLMC's East-based MPs, National Unity
Alliance MPs and several Muslim organizations that Mr. Hakeem should
lead an independent Muslim delegation at peace negotiations.
The three NUA
MPs - Ferial Ashraff, M.L.A.M. Hisbullah and Segu Issadeen pledged
support to the SLMC on conditions that it should field a separate
Muslim delegation for talks and promote setting up of a predominantly
Muslim Council in the East.
Mr. Hakeem,
therefore, had to reach a compromise between these two ends. It
was clear from the very beginning that the government was keen on
having Mr. Hakeem on its side as his presence would help them to
increase its bargaining power, especially when it comes to devolution
proposals for the East.
But Mr. Hakeem's
prime concern was his larger responsibility towards his community,
the Muslims, who now look up to him to clinch a fair deal for them
in the final solution to the North-East conflict. When he left Sri
Lankan shores in the wee hours of Sunday morning his mind was preoccupied
with the immediate challenge before him - striking a balance between
these ends and getting the LTTE green light for it.
And this he
did during his discussion with Dr. Balasingham. After hard bargaining,
the SLMC leader managed to get what he wanted - to be part of the
government delegation in the preliminary round of talks and lead
a separate Muslim delegation from the second round when more contentious
issues are taken up. Mr. Hakeem is also scheduled to hold his long
overdue second meeting with LTTE Chief Prabhakaran after the first
round of talks.
|