Teacher strangled and robbed
By Tania Fernando
A teacher was found strangled and stripped of her
jewellery at her house in Piliyandala in broad daylight on Thursday.
The autopsy
report reveals that the cause of death was manual strangulation
and that she has been killed between 10 a.m. and 12 noon.
Her body was
discovered only when her daughter returned home after work around
6.45 p.m. The husband of the teacher, Mr. Wickrematilake, said his
wife had stayed home on Thursday, after their dog messed up their
house.
"She said
that she wants to stay at home and clean the house", he said,
adding that she had called him around 9 a.m. at his office and told
him not to call her as she was going to sleep for a while and to
call after 12 noon.
However, when
he had tried to call her during the day, there had been no answer.
When their daughter had returned home, she had found her mother
lying on the bed dead, with her face down.
The 52-year
old physical education teacher was stripped of her jewellery and
even the bedsheet of the bed on which she was lying, had apparently
been taken by the thief.
"There were bruises on her neck,and her nose was broken, but
the house had not been searched or ransacked by the thief",
he said.
Although the
incident had occurred on Thursday, Mr. Wickremathilake said that
he had to give four calls to the Piliyandala Police, but they did
not take any finger prints at the scene of the crime till Saturday
afternoon.
"The police
asked us not to touch anything in the room and subsequently an officer
asked us to keep the room locked", he said.
Meanwhile,
the Piliyandala Police said they are conducting investigations but
are yet to make a break-through.
All
powerful CC with 18th Amendment
In the
process of providing legal immunity to the Constitutional Council
with the 18th Amendment, enabling it to make the necessary appointments
to the long awaited independent commissions, the bill which has
been presented to Parliament makes the Council one of the most powerful
institutions of governance.
Section three
of the proposed bill makes it possible for the Constitutional Council
to make rules setting out the procedures and guidelines to be followed
by it only subject to the fact that they are communicated to Parliament.
Under the provisions
of the Bill no decision of the Constitutional Council can be challenged
in court, including the Supreme Court, on the grounds of fundamental
rights violations.
According to
section 5 of the bill no suit can be filed against any of the members
of the Constitutional Council. This provision had been brought in
response to a crisis which arose in the functioning of the Constitutional
Council after it was set up. Members of the council, many of whom
were former judges or lawyers had refused to take up appointment
fearing legal action once they appointed members to the independent
commissions.
This brought
to a standstill the much awaited functioning of the Council and
delayed the appointments to all the independent commissions which
the government pledged to instal in the first three months of its
regime.
The section
also states that any attempt by any individual to influence the
decision of the Council can draw a fine or prison term not exceeding
seven years.
There was also
the problem of financing the Constitutional Council since the members
had to be paid out of parliamentary allocations for the year. This
has been taken care in section three of the bill with monies being
allocated from the Consolidated Fund.
|