Bedfellows
can make strange politics
There are two different takes in the international media about
the 'hand of friendship' extended by the President towards the UNF
government. The AFP says that the "UNF pooh-poohed the President's
initiatives.' The Hindu (international) says on the other hand that
the UNF welcomed the President's initiatives - albeit with some qualifications.
The people
for their part don't seem to know whether to laugh or to cry over
all these developments. The UNF seems to be saying "all this
sweetness is killing us."
This sweetness
may be literally killing the UNF. By pretending that she is for
compromise, the President can keep the UNF in a bind, and paint
the government as the stubborn unwilling political tough.
This will make
it difficult for the UNF to pursue its own agenda - its own 'mandate'
as Minister G. L. Peiris has said.
Can the PA
form a government against the popular tide, which seems to be one
of endorsing the peace process? This would have weighed on the mind
of the President. Take the United States for instance. An emphatic
statement has been made by a high-ranking US official, to the effect
that there should be a bi-partisan consensus towards building peace
in Sri Lanka.
It is very
unlikely that the LTTE would want to work towards peace with a Chandrika-led
government. There is so much bad feeling between Prabhakaran and
Kumaratunga that you could say that there is a psychological chasm
there that is quite unbridgeable.
If Sarath Amunugama
and all the eager beavers of the PA want to form a government, despite
all that - it is necessarily going to be a government by unreasonable
force. Caution: this is obviously not to say that such a government
will be by coup detat.
It is perfectly
legitimate for the President to dismiss the Wickremesinghe government
and ask her own party, or ask anybody else for that matter, to form
a government. But what's constitutional is not necessarily going
to engender public support or universal sympathy.
It is not a
case of being for or against the peace process, but a case of going
against various forces which are probably too powerful for the President
to contend with. If the President forms a government of her own,
she will not be able to work with the LTTE - which means that there
will necessarily be a breakdown in the peace process. If there is
a breakdown in the peace process, it will probably mean that the
Kumaratunga government would have alienated so many powerful forces
- that it will not be in a position to survive.
So even though
it is the UNF that seems to be fighting with its back to the wall
at the moment, it is the PA which needs to watch out before making
any pre-emptive moves towards forming a government that will be
destined to fail.
These political
imperatives seem to be irrelevant to the brat pack of MPs who seem
to be hell bent on forming a government, notwithstanding the fact
that all reasonable political considerations weigh against the suitability
of such a government in the immediate term. For Amunugama, any sort
of government will do - if he is in it. So with the rest of the
brat pack.
How long will
such a government last, with a TNA which will quite obviously not
like to work with a dispensation that is headed by Chandrika Kumaratunga?
G. L. Peiris has reworked his rhetoric. He says that "an election
is definitely an option that the UNF has but it is not necessary.''
It means that
the UNF is confident that it cannot get a two-thirds majority at
an election. If there is no two thirds majority the situation will
be back to square one, except perhaps that the UNF will have won
a further year, in which it can be confident that the President
cannot dissolve parliament.
But delve deeper
into this whole can of worms, and one will find more in the form
of odious possibilities. What if Chandrika Kumaratunga dissolves
parliament, when the UNF slides in popularity, further into its
own term? Will that necessarily mean that the voter, at the ensuing
election, will go on the perception that it is Kumaratunga who calls
the shots - which means it is better to vote with the PA?
That is the
vast intangible that even the greatest political masters will not
be able to quite size-up. Definitely Sri Lankan voters have been
voting on perceptions, and if the perception is that the PA is calling
all the shots, it will stand to reason that the PA will have the
advantage if the President dissolves parliament and calls for an
election. But other than that, it cannot be forgotten that the UNF
is playing with a great hand.
The entire
media seems to be at its beck and call - and this is not a question
of having to railroad the media into doing its own bidding. The
UNF, by proxy at least, basically seems to own the media today -
and the PA does not have a voice except for a wretched and miserable
party paper.
Under the circumstances,
the UNF can virtually hang the PA as the wrecker of the peace process,
and the one time wrecker of the economy poised to do it again.
The UNF seems
on the other hand to be painting the President as being more popular
than she actually is. It appears that the UNF's media machine is
not half as powerful as the PA's when the PA was in power.
But it also
seems to be a blessing of sorts. The UNF is more subtle - and since
the media are a willing player, it seems that the UNF's line is
being articulated more naturally in TV and in newspapers. Read:
The message seems to look less like blatant propaganda.
But even so-
the UNF will have to live with the anxiety that the President can
dissolve parliament. If this anxiety is to be delayed, by a further
year, the UNF can call for an election now. The UNF will be buying
exactly one year of solid security. But then again - the UNF cannot
go for an election. The President says that calling for an election
is her own constitutional prerogative, and what's the court that
is not going to vote with her?
So there it
is - the UNF's options are to cohabit with a President who is herself
a lame duck, despite all her huge constitutional powers. Cohabit,
and pray that the press and Prabhakaran will join hands to keep
the UNF afloat - not the most enviable of predicaments. But as they
say in the new inversion of that notorious line, bedfellows can
make for strange politics?
|