LTTE's tongue-in-cheek
talk
LTTE theoretician
Anton Balasingham has probably overstepped his limits when he called
for a parliamentary election to form a more stable government. It
may be that the LTTE is worried that a durable peace agreement could
not be reached under the present political climate in the south with
the PA and the UNF at each other's throat.
This may be a fair assumption. But the LTTE also should have a hang
of the political realities of the south.
The southern
parts of the country which constitute more than two-thirds of the
Sri Lanka's land area offer a complex picture. Its complexities
are far difficult to be understood and if the LTTE leadership is
yearning for a durable peace and is really committed to peace, it
should not unnecessarily dabble with the politics of the south.
Let the LTTE analyse, talk and do whatever for its own consumption,
but when it makes public statements, they make things difficult
for the government.
Prime Minister
Ranil Wickremesinghe has said that the path to peace is an arduous
one. When he said this, he probably had in his mind opposition not
only from the PA but also within the UNF. The LTTE therefore should
realise that the peace process is a delicate exercise as far as
the south is concerned. In the present context even if the government
wanted to hold an election, its critics would brand it as an LTTE
stooge.
The public perception
on the LTTE tongue lashing on the President and the subsequent call
for a general election is that the government is prepared to surrender
the rights of the Sinhalese and the rest of the country to accommodate
the LTTE agenda.
Even if it
is not the case, the LTTE has given enough ammunition for the PA
to hit out at the government. Moreover, the LTTE statement came
at a time when the government was facing multiple problems on many
fronts. The SLMC crisis and the legal setback to the 18th and 19th
amendments were some of them.
The LTTE should
not adopt a position separating the President from the government
because the President is not only head of the state but also head
of the government according to the constitution.
At the same
time the LTTE should be able to discuss matters with any party in
power whether, it be the UNF or the PA regardless of their policies,
if they are sincere enough. In such circumstances the fears expressed
by President Chandrika Kumaratunga are valid and reasonable.
At a recent
press briefing in Colombo, former minister Nimal Siripala de Silva
echoed the President's view when he said that Mr. Balasingham's
statement was a matter of security concern for the President.
The security
of the President is to be stepped up in view of this statement.
The PA may
be over-reacting to the statement, as it is unlikely that the LTTE
would resort to terrorism or assassinations given the present global
and domestic political scenarios.
As it appears,
the President or the People's Alliance will not obstruct any peaceful
settlement to the ethnic conflicts, though the President has expressed
reservations about certain steps taken by the UNF government. The
president's view reflect the southern fears that the LTTE has not
given up its ultimate goal of achieving a separate state though
it now speaks of a federal set up.
We could talk
about political models as long as there is mutual trust between
the parties. But the question many ask even after the two direct
meetings in Thailand is can the LTTE be trusted.
The LTTE which
proclaimed that it would only talk about the setting up of an interim
administration during the first round of talks following the signing
of the memorandum of understanding with the government has conveniently
gone back on its word. The question that arises is whether they
are not interested in an interim administration for the NorthEast.
The simple
answer is that they have already set up their administration in
the North and the East and the need to discuss the matter has not
arisen so far.
Most of the
obstacles for an interim administration have been withdrawn.
If an interim
administration is set up the LTTE would not have a free hand, because
it would also consist of Muslim and Sinhala representatives; the
LTTE would be compelled to consider their point of view as well.
Moreover, once the interim council is set up, the government's writ
will prevail over the entire North and East.
In this context,
the government should expedite the setting up of an interim administration
with the help of all political parties representing the North and
the East.
To-date the
people in the South feel that the government had been giving in
to LTTE demands far in excess of what is necessary and therefore
it is now the LTTE's turn to show its willingness to work within
a legal framework acceptable to all Sri Lankans.
Another point
to ponder is the setting up of the Joint Task Force to oversee the
development programmes in the North and the East.
The LTTE is
apparently not in favour of the Norwegian proposal that it should
come under the purview of the Prime Minister's Office. It clearly
shows that the LTTE is averse to anything flowing from the centre
or subject itself to the dictates of the centre.
The LTTE wants
the JTF to be independent. This was the bone of contention for the
SLMC leader Rauff Hakeem who participated in the talks as a government
delegate amidst crisis in his own party.
The SLMC earlier
wanted two separate sub units for the North and the East while the
Joint Task Force would function as the apex body.
When the LTTE
insisted that the JTF should be independent and it should not come
under the purview of the Prime Minister's Office the government
delegates were baffled. The SLMC advisers by this time had informed
Mr. Hakeem that he should stage a walk out if the LTTE is not coming
to terms with the SLMC.
However, eventually
a compromise formula prevailed with both sides agreeing to accommodate
two SLMC members in the sub-committee on North-East rehabilitation
which would replace the JTF. It was also agreed that the sub-committee
would come under the purview of two peace delegations.
It is a major
gain for the SLMC. The LTTE will have four members in the committee
while the government will have four, including the two SLMC nominees.
The government
is likely to nominate Peace Secretariat Chief Bernard Gunatilleke
and Defence Secretary Austin Fernando while the SLMC is yet to decide
on its nominees. Most of the SLMCers are of the view that the two
nominees should be from the East.
Besides the
composition of the sub-committee, the other important area is the
disbursement of funds in a more transparent manner with proper auditing
and continuous monitoring of the development work.
In another
development, the mini-donor conference in Oslo on November 25 is
assuming added significance, as LTTE chief negotiator Mr. Balasingham
will for the first time be meeting Prime Minister Wickremesinghe.
They are likely
to take up some key issues on the sidelines of the mini-donor summit,
which would be attended by more than 20 developed countries, including
the United States and Britain.
Besides the
sub-committee on the rehabilitation work, the two sides meeting
in Thailand also agreed on another sub-committee that would set
in motion a process of military de-escalation. This was another
positive development that gave the UNF government some thing to
talk about.
The day the
government's chief negotiator Minister G. L. Peiris arrived in the
country, he visited the Malwatte and Asgiriya Mahanayakes to brief
them on the developments. Though the Malwatte prelate had some questions
about the 200-year jail term for the Tiger leader Prabhakaran, the
Asgiriya prelate blessed both the government and the LTTE for their
efforts to restore law and order in the country.
Minister Peiris
told the Malwatte prelate that there had been instances where governments
had spoken to rebel groups while they had been subjected to judicial
inquiry.
However, the
LTTE is not prepared to take the 200-year jail term imposed on the
Tiger leader by the High Court kindly. The LTTE described the judgment
as absurd and said that even the Sri Lankan government could be
tried for war crimes.
Many questions
have been raised over the timing of the judgment. There is speculation
that the government did not want the judgment delivered on the day
the talks were to begin with the LTTE.
In the morning
on the day the judgment was delivered, it was observed that an accused
who was in custody was not present and the sentence was put off
for the afternoon session. But when the accused was not produced
again the court went ahead with the judgment while the judgment
on the accused who was not present was put off for another day.
There were
rumours in the political circles as to whether the government had
a hand in not producing the accused in court in a bid to prompt
a postponement.
However the
court delivered the judgment prompting criticism by the LTTE. Certain
anti-LTTE lobbyists are now planning to file a writ of mandamus
in the Court of Appeal compelling the Director CID to arrest the
LTTE leaders when they are passing through Katunayake since they
felt that the criticism by the LTTE leader of the judgment is a
clear case for a contempt under the Sri Lankan law.
Some legal
experts are of the view that the government has already accepted
the existence of a de facto state in the North East and the views
expressed by the Tiger leaders cannot be construed as contempt.
To support this argument, several legal luminaries have cited the
case of General Franco of Spain before he became the de jure leader
of Spain.
In their view,
Mr. Balasingham has done his home work on international law when
he proclaimed that there is already an administration running in
their territory. He has stressed that the LTTE has is own administration,
courts, police and an armed force.
When Mr. Balasingham
uttered all these, there was no response from the Sri Lankan side,
which means that they had unwittingly accepted this situation.
Now, the fear
among the political circles is whether the LTTE is going to get
direct financial assistance following the Oslo conference.
However, Prime
Minister Wickremesinghe had allayed fears saying the Oslo conference
aid would be presented to Parliament by way of a supplementary estimate.
He has given this assurance at the government group meeting on Wednesday.
Minister Peiris
told the group meeting that though the opposition levelled charges
against the government, it had failed to discuss key political issues,
while the government delegation had taken up several matters with
the LTTE.
Prime Minister
Wickremesinghe called upon the government parliamentarians to be
present in parliament every day to take up challenges thrown by
the opposition, during the Budget debate.
He said a government
delegation including Ministers Peiris, Hakeem and Milinda Moragoda
would also be in Oslo along with him to attend the mini donor meeting.
However, the
government parliamentarians were not very happy since the government's
second Budget failed to address the grievances faced by the Samurdhi
recipients. They discussed these matters on the corridors of the
parliamentary complex. They were also concerned about the de-centralised
budget allocations for opposition MPs.
The UNP MPs
from the south were more worried about this since the JVP too would
be benefited by the government allocation. Their complain was that
while they have to spend money on bigger development projects, the
JVP would spend this money on small rural development schemes which
would have a greater impact.
The UNP MPs
say they will have to put an extra effort to sustain the popularity
of the government against hyperactive JVP propaganda.
Meanwhile,
President Kumaratunga addressing the PA parliamentary group on Tuesday
said that she as the head of the state proposed to take several
crucial steps in the near future and that she was expecting the
support of all PA MPs.
"We are
prepared to support the government when they do the right things.
They cannot get our co-operation by holding out threats," the
President said.
The President's
remarks may be a cause for concern for the UNPers.
|