Illusive
growth targets and attainments
It is one thing to project higher economic growth rates, it
is quite another to attain them. In recent years the government has
predicted fairly high economic growth rates, but achieved much lower
rates. The Budget Speech stated that the Central Bank expects the
economy to grow by 3.5 per cent this year owing to a second half-year
resurgence of the economy. It also projected higher growth rates for
the subsequent years. In 2003 the economy is projected to grow by
5.5 per cent followed by still higher growth rates of 6.3 and 6.8
percent in 2004 and 2005.
Given the fact
that the economy shrank by 1.4 per cent last year, the value of
the total goods and services produced this year is expected to be
only about 1.6 per cent higher than what it was in 2000. This growth
rate is somewhat misleading, as it was after a severe dip in production
in the previous year. The growth of 3 per cent this year is due
to the recovery of the economy after the worst- ever-economic performance.
Therefore the growth rate of 3 per cent is to some extent a misleading
statistical artefact.
When we make
an allowance for the population increase of about 1.1 per cent,
our per capita incomes would be about the same this year as it was
two years before in 2000. This means that our economic conditions
have been basically stagnant. The economic growth of this magnitude
will not get us far ahead of even what we were. It appears that
we are" a slow sort of country (where) it takes all the running
you can do to keep in the same place". And as Lewis Carroll
says in Alice in Wonderland, " If you want to get somewhere
else, you must run at least twice as fast as that."
The economic
growth of both 2001 and 2002 are among the lowest experienced in
recent years. Since the dip in economic growth in the JVP insurgent
years, the economy grew by between 3.8 to 6.3 per cent during 1995
to 2000. The lower figure was in 1996, when the economy faced a
severe drought and power crisis. The highest growth was in 1997,
when there was resurgence after the crisis of 1996. Again this growth
rate in 1997 was somewhat misleading, as it was after a dip in production
in the previous year as it too was due to the recovery of the economy
after a poor economic performance.
The unfortunate
fact is that our economic growth does not match the expectations
of around 7 that has been articulated as needed to resolve the country's
problems of poverty, low incomes and unemployment that are the underlying
reasons for social tensions that often ends in a disruption in economic
activities. Maintaining an economic growth rate of 7 to 8 per cent
over a decade or so has become more a dream. The euphoria generated
by the peace prospects has made the Finance Minister to again hope
that such a dream would be a reality. Budget 2003 has projected
higher growth rates once again to reach nearly the desirable 7 per
cent by 2005.
Certainly if
a durable peace is attained we will have a higher rate of growth.
Yet, peace alone will not suffice. There are many changes and reforms
that are needed, if we can ensure that the fruits of peace are not
a temporary boom but a sustained growth momentum. Therein lies the
difficulty. The social engineering required to enable the higher
sustained growth is difficult in our cultural and political milieu.
Equally important are favourable global economic conditions Sri
Lanka's trade dependent economy can grow only in a hospitable international
environment. The global recession was largely, though not solely,
responsible for the low growth last year. The revival of the global
economy had its favourable impact on the Sri Lankan economy in recent
months and accounts for the second half's expected growth of 4.5
per cent. However it is vitally necessary that we are not solely
dependent on the global growth alone. There have been unfavourable
developments in the industrial sector that makes our main exports
less competitive in international markets. High costs of production
due to many reasons are fast making the competitiveness of our products
in the international market doubtful. China, Indonesia, Vietnam
and Bangladesh are among the countries whose industrial products
are cheaper. They pose a real threat to our industries unless input
costs especially that of electricity is brought down and the management
of industry ensures a higher productivity.
The international
Monetary Fund has been careful to point out " increased concerns
about the strength and durability of the global economic recovery."
The world economic situation has been summed up, by these words
of the IMF: " By early 2002, it seemed that a global economic
recovery led by the United States, was underway. By middle 2002,
however weaknesses in emerging markets, as well as in mature equity
markets, indicated an increase in risk aversion among investors.
This sentiment in turn, raised questions about the strength of the
recovery.''
This is hardly
the environment in which a global economic recovery could be maintained.
There are real concerns about the Japanese economy, especially its
financial services that have been in crisis ever since the East
Asian Financial Crisis. If war does break out in the Middle East,
the fragility of the Sri Lankan economy would be once again exposed.
A rise in crude oil prices would have a serious impact on our industries
and on our balance of payments. There is very little advantage that
we can expect from a war situation. Tea prices, tourism, Middle
Eastern worker remittances and foreign investment, are all likely
to be adversely affected. The only hope is that the current efforts
of the UN would avert such a catastrophe. Given an uncertain international
environment, difficult as it may be, we must look towards internal
reforms that would enhance productivity and bring down the costs
of production. The growth of the Sri Lankan economy based on the
reconstruction effort and the resuscitation of the depressed sectors
of the economy in the North and East, must be supplemented with
improvements in infrastructure and increase in efficiency. Without
such developments it is difficult to achieve a sustained growth
of the economy in a highly volatile, harsh competitive environment.
Higher rates of economic growth cannot be achieved by a mere presentation
of statistical projections. It must be backed by both governmental
actions to stimulate the economy as well as by individual resolves
to ensure higher productivity. There is certainly new hope with
the prospects of a durable peace, but we have much more to do if
we are to achieve the higher growth projected in the Budget.
|