Condemning
these student devils
When St Augustine (AD 354-430) invoked the wrath of the Almighty
on the students of Carthage who had been guilty of "subverting"
(the ancient terminology for ragging), his towering condemnation was
to the effect that "Nothing can be more like the very actions
of devils than these". This country has now again witnessed the
ultimate; the death of a university student - one of the peaceful
majority who dared to intervene on the behalf of first year students
who were being ragged. Another of his colleagues is critically ill
but reported to be out of immediate danger. St Augustine's words (irrespective
of their theological connotations) may well ring through the ages;
those responsible for what happened to these innocents are devils
indeed.
Ovitagala Vitanage
Samantha's death follows a pattern of increased indiscipline in
Sri Lankan Universities in the recent past. We are hearing simultaneous
reports of clashes at the University of Colombo and a disquieting
report regarding the disappearance of a student of the University
of Peradeniya. Prior to this, from the year 2000, we saw the upsurge
of alarming violence at the University of Kelaniya, the University
of Ruhuna, the Jayawardenepura University and the University of
Colombo.
Most of these
incidents have involved clashes between two student groups, both
with political backing. The heavy involvement of JVP backed students
in the majority of these clashes is also an acknowledged fact, whatever
the precise nature of its role in the present violence at Sri Jayawardenepura
University, (with regard to which inquiries are ongoing), may be.
Thus, during the years 2000 to 2001, we had violence between student
groups representing the JVP and the PA in many of these universities,
including an incident in March 2001 when the Ruhunu University students
were attacked by thugs of a prominent Peoples Alliance Minister.
Currently, we are heading for more violence between JVP groups and
university students' unions affiliated with the UNP in a scary re-enacting
of the 1980's.
Looked at from
an abstract viewpoint, what is happening in the universities is
no more a reflection than what is taking place in the country today.
We have on the one hand, highly subversive forces and on the other,
a largely general apathy on the part of university administrators
and academics. Excepting a minority in certain universities who
have taken a strongly apolitical and courageous position in opposing
the violence, the majority of our academics have been quiescent,
some openly compromising and others preferring to remain on the
sidelines. This is due to an obvious fact; just as much as the students
have become politicised, the academics in this country of ours are
also politicised. Witness therefore the shameful phenomenon of academics
venturing out with statements that support one political party or
another. Witness also the far too common instances where academics
are seen to intervene positively only when their own political interests
are not directly in issue. What can we expect therefore from the
students? Should not part of the blame for what is happening today
in our universities be laid directly on those who are supposed to
act as mentors and teachers, not only in the sense of arid book
learning but in actual direction and guidance of their charges?
Meanwhile as
far as the university authorities are concerned, the panacea is
- as usual- to talk of stricter laws. These measures currently being
contemplated include provision for universities to summon the police
immediately upon the incidence of violence within campuses and the
banning of unauthorised unions. The Vice Chancellor of the Sri Jayawardenpura
University has called for a setting up of a police post within the
university, provision for direct contact with a police superintendant
and the reorganisation of tougher security measures. While these
measures may or may not be wise - given the excessive politicisation
of the police force itself in the present context- one might be
forgiven for wondering as to what exactly has happened to the "Prohibition
of Ragging and Other Forms of Violence in Educational Institutions"
Act, No 20 of 1998, which was enacted precisely to deter incidents
of the nature that led to the killing of O.V. Samantha?
It must be
recalled that the passing of anti-ragging legislation in Parliament
was in consequence of particularly violent incidents of ragging
leading to at least two deaths in higher educational institutions.
Interestingly, one would also recall that the Bill was immediately
challenged in the Supreme Court by a student body of the University
of Sri Jayawardenepura and a university student on the basis that
it violated their rights to equality and freedom of expression.
Some of their concerns were later upheld by a judgment of the Supreme
Court (comprising Justices M.D.H. Fernando, A. de Z. Gunewardene
and D.P.S. Gunesekera) which went on to suggest amendments that
brought punishments under the law in line with similar punishments
under the Penal Code.
The Court however
upheld, in the main, the definition of ragging as an "any act
which causes or is likely to cause physical or psychological injury
or mental pain
to a student or a staff member."
This was on the basis that " Students, specially newcomers,
are entitled to have their personality respected by not being subjected
even to words which affect their dignity and personality, whether
these words are obscene, abusive, derogatory, humiliating, degrading
or contemptuous"
At this moment
in time however, we see the Supreme Court judgment - and indeed
the Act itself- being reduced to nought. The reason for this has
been that formal complaints under the Ragging Act are necessary
for prosecutions, which do not come about as both staff and students
are not inclined to confront intimidation and peer pressure. This
indeed, remains the issue.
It is worthwhile
to remember that in 1998, the Court commented that " Ragging
has for too long been cruel, inhuman and degrading. Our society
has been unable to deal with the root causes of ragging, and the
anxieties, fears and frustrations of youth on which ragging has
fed and flourished
"
These words
encapsulate the essence of the problem that still confronts Sri
Lankan universities today. This is a problem that cannot be dealt
with by the passing of more laws, the enforcement of far severe
punishments or even perhaps - the setting up police posts within
universities. Instead, it requires thoughtful and reasoned deliberations
by those heading our institutions of higher learning as to how exactly
to bring about a critical mass of opinion among faculty and students
that would rejuvenate the 1998 anti-ragging laws, minimise politicisation
of the students and foster an actual atmosphere of learning. We
can, of course, still hope.
|