| Hail 
            thou the Moragoda Mantra
 Those who read last Sunday's news item 
            headlined "Moragoda promotes US hegemony" might well have 
            wondered whether the Sri Lanka government had momentarily taken leave 
            of its collective wisdom.
 
   According 
              to the report in this paper, Minister for Economic Reforms Milinda 
              Moragoda had told a Asia Pacific security conference in Honolulu 
              that the United States should take on the sole leadership of the world.
 
  Unfortunately 
              his "address" to the security conference was not reported 
              'in extenso' but there was enough evidence to indicate his thinking.
 "If 
              the United States were to apply its resources to promote democracy 
              and free trade worldwide, and do so with respect for its partners 
              and with the patience and restrain (sic) that the strong should 
              show to those less strong, then not only would the security of the 
              world and the causes which erode security and breed terrorism be 
              removed, but the world would look with fresh eyes upon its hegemony".
 
  Almost dreamlike 
              in quality, fascinatingly simple-minded and naïve. To begin 
              with is the minister for economic reforms the person to address 
              an Asian-Pacific security conference. True enough he has uttered 
              some words about free trade that I hope to deal with some time later. 
              But how is he specially qualified to speak on regional security 
              that is much more than exchanging goods and services freely and 
              tinkering with economic policies.
  One of the 
              most potentially dangerous flashpoints of the Cold War is the Korean 
              Peninsula. That is not the only ideological, political and territorial 
              problem besetting the Asia Pacific as observers of the region know. 
              
  The South China 
              Sea and the Taiwan Strait remain areas of potential conflict just 
              as Japan and China and Japan and Russia have territorial disputes. 
              
  American foreign 
              policy is to spread and strengthen US presence and influence in 
              the region. This has become an imperative especially after September 
              11. Washington is using the fear of terrorism to increasingly formalise 
              its military presence particularly among the Southeast Asian countries.
  Given the geo-strategic 
              importance of the region and the fact that Sri Lanka has long established 
              friendly ties with several countries in the region that have come 
              to our assistance in hard times, to publicly promote US leadership 
              not only of a potentially volatile region but of the world appears 
              to me not only foolhardy but to antagonise our friends and allies.
  I am of course, 
              arguing on the basis of Moragoda's reported remarks which I hope 
              convey fairly what the minister said. Although the minister boasts 
              a website, there was nothing in it to give one a more detailed view 
              of his thinking which seems more akin to the thoughts of the American 
              right that is now advocating a new imperial doctrine reminiscent 
              of that which prevailed in the late 19th century.
  If Minister 
              Moragoda did indeed sing several hallelujahs to the US and seriously 
              believes that the mantle of world leadership worn round American 
              shoulders will lead to a more democratic, economically fair, environmentally 
              sustainable and equitable world, then he is the unfortunate victim 
              of his own hallucinations.
  By pleading 
              for US hegemony and for it to assume world leadership, is Mr Moragoda 
              not contradicting the policy of non-alignment that this government 
              claims it is wedded to?
  Only a few 
              weeks ago Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, in the course of 
              a reply to a question on whether the government would provide facilities 
              to the US military for an attack on Iraq, said that Sri Lanka followed 
              a non-aligned foreign policy.
  The formal 
              end to the Cold War 12 years or so ago might have undermined the 
              principal tenet of non-alignment- that is not to be tied to either 
              super power and to stay away from the two power blocs that represented 
              east-west confrontation.
  While this 
              was intended to deny the paramountcy of either superpower, non-alignment 
              had equally valid political and economic goals.
  One was its 
              cardinal commitments was to oppose imperialism and colonialism. 
              So, irrespective of whether the Cold War has ended or not, the non-aligned 
              nations have a duty to combat imperialism and colonialism if and 
              when it rises. 
  And as the 
              prime minister told parliament Sri Lanka's foreign policy remains 
              that of non-alignment.
  If that is 
              so, how can Minister Moragoda ask the Asia Pacific nations to accept 
              Washington's hegemonistic role as the world leader when it is surely 
              inconsistent with our publicly avowed foreign policy? Is it that 
              Sri Lanka has surreptitiously changed it overnight or has the government 
              got a foreign policy that minister Moragoda is not fully aware of?
  In the days 
              that China was an empire, foreign visitors calling on the emperor 
              had to approach him by virtually crawling on the floor. This ungainly 
              approach was called kowtowing. 
  In ancient 
              times such obsequiousness, thrust upon a visitor, was performed 
              out of sheer necessity.
  But intellectual 
              obsequiousness is born out of ignorance or a matter of personal 
              choice. Milinda Moragoda's reverence for the stars and stripes and 
              his faith in the American model is such that he reportedly told 
              the conference "you may then still hear the cry Americans go 
              home" but that may well be accompanied by the refrain "but 
              please take me with you".
  Indeed we are 
              increasingly hearing the first part of the cry as the imperialistic 
              intentions of the American Right become more strident.
  But despite 
              minister Moragoda's prognostications hardly anybody has heard the 
              addition to the lyric, certainly not sung by those who have heard 
              of the animal-like conditions in which detainees are held in Guantanamo 
              Bay camp.
  Is that because 
              the rest of the world are more realistic than Moragoda and are disinclined 
              to blindly burn incense to a United States that suddenly turns benevolent 
              in its future hegemonistic role. 
  When the Cold 
              War ended leaving the US supreme, President George Bush coined a 
              catch phrase for the emerging global scenario- New World Order.
  His son George 
              W. Bush who became president by manipulating and undermining the 
              very democracy that Moragoda wants Washington to promote globally- 
              now has visions of empire.
  Improving on 
              his father George W. has imposed a New World Odour that smells foully 
              of a new neo-imperialism of which we shall no doubt hear more.  
             |