Hail
thou the Moragoda Mantra
Those who read last Sunday's news item
headlined "Moragoda promotes US hegemony" might well have
wondered whether the Sri Lanka government had momentarily taken leave
of its collective wisdom.
According
to the report in this paper, Minister for Economic Reforms Milinda
Moragoda had told a Asia Pacific security conference in Honolulu
that the United
States should take on the sole leadership of the world.
Unfortunately
his "address" to the security conference was not reported
'in extenso' but there was enough evidence to indicate his thinking.
"If
the United States were to apply its resources to promote democracy
and free trade worldwide, and do so with respect for its partners
and with the patience and restrain (sic) that the strong should
show to those less strong, then not only would the security of the
world and the causes which erode security and breed terrorism be
removed, but the world would look with fresh eyes upon its hegemony".
Almost dreamlike
in quality, fascinatingly simple-minded and naïve. To begin
with is the minister for economic reforms the person to address
an Asian-Pacific security conference. True enough he has uttered
some words about free trade that I hope to deal with some time later.
But how is he specially qualified to speak on regional security
that is much more than exchanging goods and services freely and
tinkering with economic policies.
One of the
most potentially dangerous flashpoints of the Cold War is the Korean
Peninsula. That is not the only ideological, political and territorial
problem besetting the Asia Pacific as observers of the region know.
The South China
Sea and the Taiwan Strait remain areas of potential conflict just
as Japan and China and Japan and Russia have territorial disputes.
American foreign
policy is to spread and strengthen US presence and influence in
the region. This has become an imperative especially after September
11. Washington is using the fear of terrorism to increasingly formalise
its military presence particularly among the Southeast Asian countries.
Given the geo-strategic
importance of the region and the fact that Sri Lanka has long established
friendly ties with several countries in the region that have come
to our assistance in hard times, to publicly promote US leadership
not only of a potentially volatile region but of the world appears
to me not only foolhardy but to antagonise our friends and allies.
I am of course,
arguing on the basis of Moragoda's reported remarks which I hope
convey fairly what the minister said. Although the minister boasts
a website, there was nothing in it to give one a more detailed view
of his thinking which seems more akin to the thoughts of the American
right that is now advocating a new imperial doctrine reminiscent
of that which prevailed in the late 19th century.
If Minister
Moragoda did indeed sing several hallelujahs to the US and seriously
believes that the mantle of world leadership worn round American
shoulders will lead to a more democratic, economically fair, environmentally
sustainable and equitable world, then he is the unfortunate victim
of his own hallucinations.
By pleading
for US hegemony and for it to assume world leadership, is Mr Moragoda
not contradicting the policy of non-alignment that this government
claims it is wedded to?
Only a few
weeks ago Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, in the course of
a reply to a question on whether the government would provide facilities
to the US military for an attack on Iraq, said that Sri Lanka followed
a non-aligned foreign policy.
The formal
end to the Cold War 12 years or so ago might have undermined the
principal tenet of non-alignment- that is not to be tied to either
super power and to stay away from the two power blocs that represented
east-west confrontation.
While this
was intended to deny the paramountcy of either superpower, non-alignment
had equally valid political and economic goals.
One was its
cardinal commitments was to oppose imperialism and colonialism.
So, irrespective of whether the Cold War has ended or not, the non-aligned
nations have a duty to combat imperialism and colonialism if and
when it rises.
And as the
prime minister told parliament Sri Lanka's foreign policy remains
that of non-alignment.
If that is
so, how can Minister Moragoda ask the Asia Pacific nations to accept
Washington's hegemonistic role as the world leader when it is surely
inconsistent with our publicly avowed foreign policy? Is it that
Sri Lanka has surreptitiously changed it overnight or has the government
got a foreign policy that minister Moragoda is not fully aware of?
In the days
that China was an empire, foreign visitors calling on the emperor
had to approach him by virtually crawling on the floor. This ungainly
approach was called kowtowing.
In ancient
times such obsequiousness, thrust upon a visitor, was performed
out of sheer necessity.
But intellectual
obsequiousness is born out of ignorance or a matter of personal
choice. Milinda Moragoda's reverence for the stars and stripes and
his faith in the American model is such that he reportedly told
the conference "you may then still hear the cry Americans go
home" but that may well be accompanied by the refrain "but
please take me with you".
Indeed we are
increasingly hearing the first part of the cry as the imperialistic
intentions of the American Right become more strident.
But despite
minister Moragoda's prognostications hardly anybody has heard the
addition to the lyric, certainly not sung by those who have heard
of the animal-like conditions in which detainees are held in Guantanamo
Bay camp.
Is that because
the rest of the world are more realistic than Moragoda and are disinclined
to blindly burn incense to a United States that suddenly turns benevolent
in its future hegemonistic role.
When the Cold
War ended leaving the US supreme, President George Bush coined a
catch phrase for the emerging global scenario- New World Order.
His son George
W. Bush who became president by manipulating and undermining the
very democracy that Moragoda wants Washington to promote globally-
now has visions of empire.
Improving on
his father George W. has imposed a New World Odour that smells foully
of a new neo-imperialism of which we shall no doubt hear more.
|