Pramuka
crisis
Pramuka
depositors plead for justice!
By Thushara Matthias
Two men with files in their hands walked into the business desk
of The Sunday Times on Monday morning last week, pleading for justice.
"Please help us turn around Pramuka Bank. If the Central Bank
decides that it must go into liquidation, all depositors will be
in trouble. We would never be able to recover our money as the liquidation
process takes years. Please we need to convince the Central Bank
and the government that the bank should continue to function,"
said Ranjan Arambawela, a depositor, who was close to tears.
Arambawela along
with another depositor S.R. Sivakumar, explained in detail the plight
of Pramuka depositors since the bank was abruptly closed by the
Central Bank over concerns that its non-performing loans' portfolio
had exceeded authorized limits. It was the first time a local bank
has been shut down pending an investigation and its assets frozen.
Both men - who
have separately deposited more than Rs. 500,000 in Pramuka - said
they were hoping to call a meeting of all depositors to decide on
a course of action including a guarantee from depositors' not to
withdraw money for a specified period of time to enable another
bank or institution to take over.
"We are
prepared to help the Central Bank to run the bank. We are trying
to get guarantees from depositors not to pull out their funds if
the Central Bank decides that the bank should be managed by another
party," said Arambawela, who currently has the backing of 20
depositors, in the battle to keep the bank alive.
Here is their
story:
"Soon after the Central Bank suspended the business of the
Pramuka Savings and Development Bank (PSDB), many depositors have
- sometimes daily - come to the bank premises trying to find out
what is happening to their money.
What will happen
to our hard earned money? That's what people want to know. On November
2, depositors gathered outside the bank in Kollupitiya and agreed
to form an association called the Pramuka Bank Depositors' Association
to recover and safeguard their deposits. We were, however, only
able to contact around 20 depositors who were present on this day.
We very briefly
met the deputy director of Bank Supervision at the Central Bank,
who couldn't comment on the situation saying the probe was on. We
sought the assistance of the Colombo Fraud Bureau but we were told
that without an order from the IGP, no investigation could be carried
out. We wanted some relief
someone to turn to. But there
was no one to answer our questions.
What we can't
understand is how Pramuka Bank was able to honour its obligations
without default if it is in trouble. In fact one of the depositors
had withdrawn Rs. 1.2 million a few weeks before the bank was closed
in a routine withdrawal. There was no indication from Pramuka whatsoever
that they were in some sort of difficulty.
We are trying
to organize this association to help our depositors and see whether
we could help the Central Bank, another bank or even the present
bank management - if needed under Central Bank supervision - turn
around Pramuka if there is a crisis.
The whole objective
is to protect our investments and try to stop any attempt to liquidate.
The depositors are from different walks of life. Their deposits
vary from Rs. 600,000 to Rs. 2 million including hard-earned retirement
benefits and money earned while working abroad.
The depositors
are in a helpless position. No one is prepared at the Central Bank
to provide us a proper hearing and we are unable to even contact
the Pramuka management. We tried Pramuka Managing Director A.H.A.
Mendis and the other directors of the bank without success. When
we call Mr. Mendis' residence, we are told he leaves at 6.30 am
and returns at 11.30 pm.
It is also ironic
that the Central Bank in an advertisement published on September
12 titled 'Institutions authorized to accept deposits from the Public"
had listed Pramuka Bank under the "Licensed Specialised Banks"
category. If at that time the public was given to understand the
bank was running in an orderly manner, how - within a month - did
the Central Bank find something wrong at Pramuka? Who are these
so-called borrowers who took away all the money overnight to make
the bank bankrupt? We like answers to these questions."
Pramuka, SEC
have your say!
The Sunday Times FT invites letters from its readers of current
issues relating to business and the economy.
Current issues
of interest include the crisis-filled Pramuka Bank, the budget,
the SEC investigation of its own chairman and other top business
personalities, accountability and governance in the private sector,
etc. Letters should be limited to a maximum of 250 words, its use
would be at the discretion of the editor and would be subject to
editing.
Post your letters
to The Business Editor, The Sunday Times FT, No 8, Hunupitiya Cross
Road, Colombo 2 or email to btimes@wijeya.lk
Scrutinise
accounts of state banks too
Why is there so much brouhaha about Pramuka Bank? True, many investors
are in imminent danger of losing their savings and if I were one
I'd certainly feel the Central Bank's action, though very possibly
too little too late, is better than none. But from a larger perspective
there are far bigger fish to catch.
The Sunday Times
recently reported that the Central Bank authorities shut down the
bank because of excessive non-performing advances. Is this a hackneyed
joke or have the authorities forgotten about the more sterling examples
of lax, excessive and improvident advances right in their own backyard:
the state banking institutions? Or, are they left alone because
the results of any exposure might be too frightful even to contemplate
?
With Pramuka,
private investors will lose money. With the frolicking at the state
banks and the evident lack of enthusiasm to take drastic action,
the whole community is faced with general erosion in the standard
of living.
Right above
the commentary on Pramuka we had the report of insider dealing by
individuals attached to the two premier investor watchdog institutions,
the SEC and the CSE. Whether these charges are eventually proved
or not is immaterial. The damage of reputation and the loss of credibility
to the two organisations are incalculable.
When the government
appoints high-profile businessmen to such elevated positions it
must foresee these situations. Having said that, I am astonished
these individuals appear not to have realised their conflict of
interest position or what is more critical, the appearance of conflict
of interest.
Insider dealing,
mismanagement, improvident advances, conflicts of interest, absence
of independence, inadequate controls, complacent ill-informed boards
- are all symptoms of the same malaise: lack of effective corporate
governance. A recent survey by McKinsey suggests international investors
are willing to pay high premiums for companies and countries that
demonstrate effective corporate governance.
In a completely
human response, many have gloated over the recent shameful breaches
of trust in North America. However, before we decide to arrogate
to ourselves the moral high ground, let us hope these latest revelations
are not suggestive of the proverbial opening of a can of worms.
Louis Roberts (A Sri Lankan-born banker in Canada)
Parate rights should be for all banks
Banking experts, analying the Pramuka crisis, said any of the smaller
commercial banks could be having a similar crisis if not for protection
in the way of parate rights.
"Many of the smaller banks have similar problems like a growing
set of defaulters because of worsening economic conditions in recent
years.
But parate rights
help them to force defaulters to settle fast or face a seizure of
their property and machinery," said one analyst, noting that
Pramuka also had sufficient collateral to cover non- performing
advances but lacked parate rights.
"Parate
rights force defaulters to pay up quickly because this process is
much swifter than going to courts to recover loans, which Pramuka
and some other specialized banks are compelled to do. Court action
takes years," he said.
"All banks should have parate rights."
The People's
Bank and other banks have begun to recover loans aggresively, advertising
heavily in newspapers on the sale of property and machinery in recent
months.
|