I
beg your pardon - I never promised you a Rose Garden
Richard Armitage put on a brave front at Temple Trees. When
this writer asked him "your government has branded the LTTE and
the Al Qaeda terrorist organisations - but why is your government,
which is not talking to the Al Qaeda under any circumstances, encouraging
our government to talk to the LTTE?'', Armitage responded clearly:
"We will not talk to Al Qaeda and we will not talk to the LTTE.''
What is Armitage
going to be doing in Oslo next week? Will he sit at the table with
the LTTE, with his mouth closed-shut with black adhesive tape? Or
will he sit at the table, and look the other way, towards the conference
room loo, when Anton Balasingham offers him a handshake?
Reportedly,
the US is asking for an assurance from the LTTE that 'there will
be no terrorism by the organisation in future under any circumstances''
before Armitage sits down with other donors, government representatives
and Tiger delegates in Oslo.
This despite
Vasudeva Nanayakkara - a staunch supporter of the peace process
- issuing a strong letter of condemnation decrying LTTE death threats
and assaults on members of the Socialist Equality Party carrying
out political work in the island of Kayts. What's a little death
threat Mr. Armitage - surely it cannot be terrorism? Naah.
The LTTE threats
in Kayts occurred despite Anton Balasingham saying clearly in Thailand
at the conclusion of the Rose Garden talks, that the "LTTE
will be a political outfit willing to work within the political
process.''
What's Balasingham
going to say to Mr. Armitage now, if he is asked about this little
business of death threats in Kayts. "I beg your pardon - I
never promised you a Rose Garden?''
The US had
better obtain an assurance from the LTTE that it will not engage
in any terrorism now or in the future - unless of course Armitage
makes a declaration before the Oslo donor meeting to this effect:
"My boss George Bush is a fool - he does not know what he is
talking about. There is no global war on terrorism - if you think
there is a global war on terrorism, just what do you think I am
doing here, talking to these boys from the LTTE, who have just come
here after issuing a couple of death threats on members of another
political party in Kayts in Sri Lanka.'' Come to think of it - Armitatge
knows these parts well. He drank king-coconut in Chavakachcheri,
gave his thumbs-up for such natural beverages, and went onto say
that the destruction in Chavakachcheri is devastating. There is
a little news for you from Chavakachcheri Mr. Armitage. Your friendly
bunch of LTTE lads from Sri Lanka, set fire to the office of another
political outfit in Chavakachcheri last week. Just a little pyrotechnics
before sitting down in Oslo to meet you - nothing that cannot be
discussed over a few king coconuts and kurumbas. Drinking kurumba
Mr. Armitage, is certainly better than eating crow.
What headlines
will they have in the newspapers, when photographs show ("we
will not talk to the LTTE'') Armitage peering into the eyes of ("I
never promised you a Rose Garden'') Balasingham over a negotiating
table in Oslqo? "Armitage eats crow in Oslo?'' "Armitage
relishes humble-pie in Norway.'' "Armitage never goes back
on his word - but says 'we will not talk to LTTE' is in fact six
words.'' Small wonder Ashley Wills doesn't like sarcasm about crows
dying in Colombo - but that's another story.
Oslo will of
course be the international coming-out party for the LTTE, and fitting
that it takes place in those parts which also has the 'tradition'
of debutante balls, in which young girls are introduced to society
at a grand society ball to which only the crème de la crème
of aristocracy is invited. ("Only old money here at debutante
balls'', the organisers would say to all the noveau riche who want
to get a look-in.)
G. L. Peiris
says that the creme de la crème' will be there at the LTTE
debutante ball in Oslo. "Which international donor gathering,
has people of the calibre of Richard Armitage, Claire Short under
one roof,'' he asked in parliament on Friday. Strictly only old
money here, chum.
They say that
match-fixing (the kind of thing that international cricketers were
supposed to be doing with the help of Indian bookmakers ) has always
been there, for time immemorial - - or from the time when sport
started. They say that races were 'fixed' at the ancient Olympics
in Greece, and that match fixing at cricket may be older than the
Ashes series. But there was no hullabaloo the way there is now -
because even if matches were fixed, those who were following the
sport never knew it. Match fixing was never a scandal , because
each time there was something improbable like a very strong batting
line up collapsing for a few runs under hundred, they would all
marvel at the 'glorious uncertainties of cricket.' It was bliss
to be ignorant those days - to think that cricket was gloriously
uncertain, when in fact book-keepers had paid the stronger side
to sacrifice their scalps.
But then came
some investigators and media zealots in the twentieth century, and
spoiled the whole mood. They said a lot of international cricket
was just a pantomime, where the spectators were made to think that
a stage-managed game was in fact a real show, with everything being
so unpredictable that it was deemed glorious.
The moral of
the story: Match fixing can be far more exciting than no match-fixing
- it is the spice of life, kind of, but if you are doing it, for
Pete's sake don't let the audience know.
So what has
all this got to do with Oslo? Think about it - there is a war on
terrorism, but while the Americans get involved somehow, the Sri
Lankans stop their own war and talk to the LTTE which blew up the
Central Bank and killed children in Gonawela. The Sri Lankans were
bound to lose this one way or the other - the match was fixed from
the beginning. Remember the Massachussetts legislature declaring
way back in the 80s that the Tigers should be supported for a bid
for a separate state in Sri Lanka?
But now - with
things happening such as ('we will not talk to the LTTE'') Armitage
sitting down with Anton Balasingham in Oslo, it is becoming almost
too obvious that this match was fixed.
The people
are beginning to wonder - and are leaving the ball park, thinking
'why were all those 60,000 scholarly papers written about this 'conflict''?
if it was for the most powerful country to say "we will not
talk to the Tigers" and sit down with them the next day? While
these same Tigers torch offices of other political parties all over
the North?
|