Strangers' in the
House liven up a lacklustre debate
By
Chandani Kirinde, Our Lobby Correspondent
The UNF government managed to comfortably push through
its Budget in Parliament last week by a majority of 31 votes, but
the final days of the year's sittings were once again dominated by
the ongoing political histrionics of the SLMC and the thorny issue
of the peace talks between the government and the LTTE.
Despite the
internal conflict in the SLMC, its members voted for the Budget
along with members of the TNA while the PA and JVP members voted
against it. A notable absentee at voting time was the SLMC leader
Rauff Hakeem.
Even though
Parliament sessions would have ended with the passage of the third
reading of the Appropriation Bill, there was an exception this year
with sittings continuing for an extra day to enable the government
to pass the Board of Investment Bill and amendments to the Monetary
Law and Customs Bills.
The votes of
two of the most important ministries were up for discussion on Monday
and Tuesday, namely the Defence and Finance Ministries respectively.
But what was surprising about the debates was the lacklustre nature
in which they were conducted.
The Defence
Ministry vote which normally draws a lot of attention, didn't seem
to inspire many of the speakers, both on the government and opposition
benches.
Polonnaruwa
District parliamentarian Maithripala Sirisena who opened the debate
on the Defence Ministry vote, made a far from exceptional speech
dealing at length with the PA's concern regarding the on going peace
process followed by an equally uninspiring speech by Minister of
Small Holder Development Susantha Punchinilame.
They were followed
by Jaffna's TNA member Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam, who informed the
House that although the Alliance supported the government's peace
efforts, it was unable to support the Defence Ministry votes and
would abstain from voting as they were unsatisfied with the ground
situation in the north and east.
Mr. Ponnambalam
also took the opportunity to speak at length on the prevention of
terrorism Act that he described as "the most savage piece of
legislation" and said it should be repealed. "The aspirations
of the Tamil people cannot be wished away by legislative oppression,
which the PTA clearly is. The only way the discontent and the resulting
violence can be brought to an end, is by finding a negotiated settlement
to the Tamil national question, by meeting the aspirations of the
Tamil man, which we believe the government is committed to doing,"
he said.
It was only
the Colombo district JVP legislator Wimal Weerawansa who had the
attention of fellow MPs and those in the galleries with his hard
hitting speech against the government's all obliging policy towards
the LTTE. "The UNF has written off the national security of
this country. There cannot be a minister of defence in this country
now. There can be only a minister of non-Defence," he charged.
He said the
government justified giving into the many demands of the LTTE ,
by saying it had fought a brutal civil war for 20 years and was
now giving it up to settle for a political settlement. "Does
this mean that if Muslim youth take up arms and fight for the next
20 years, who ever is in power will then agree to give them whatever
they demanded?" Mr.Weerawansa asked.
Soon after
his speech, the JVP legislator rose once again to a point of order
stating that two foreigners had been spotted in the officials box
in Parliament and that the two had made a speedy exit as he concluded
his speech.
This caused
a furore among opposition legislators who demanded that Defence
minister Tilak Marapana tell the House who the two were. After several
minutes of shouting, the Minister managed to get the names of the
two so called "impostors".
"The two
are here with the permission of the Speaker. They are advisors to
the defence review committee appointed by the government. They are
Col. Philip Wilkinson and Dr.Chris Smith," the Minister said.
This quietened
things down but another JVP MP Bimal Ratnayake told the House that
unlike all the local officials, whose names were recorded at the
reception at the entrance to Parliament, the names of these two
gentlemen had not been recorded.
All the passionate
appeals on behalf of the "rana viruvan" that politicians
seem to remember on days when the defence ministries votes are being
debated were largely missing this year. One of the few members who
remembered them was PA Kalutara district MP Rohitha Abeygunawardena
who said it was sad that there was no one to speak for their rights
in the House now. "You have forgotten the "Rana viruvan"
in the euphoria of the peace process. Please protect them too,"
he appealed.
Minister Marapana
winding up the debate on behalf of the government said that there
was relative calm in the country since the signing of the ceasefire
agreement but there were isolated incidents that threatened it requiring
the intervention of the armed forces.
He also assured
the House that while the peace process was proceeding, the government
has taken steps to reorganise the armed forces and train and equip
them more functionally. "The government is mindful of the need
to have an efficient and well equipped armed force whether the peace
process succeeds or fails. The ceasefire does not mean we close
shop and drop our guard. We should be more vigilant than ever before,"
he cautioned.
Meanwhile,
the internal conflict in the Muslim Congress continued to be part
of parliamentary debates for a second week with the two main rivals
Highways Minister A.L.M. Athaulla and Ports and Shipping minister
Rauff Hakeem using much of the time allocated to them to criticise
each other.
Minister Athaullah
fired the first salvo by accusing Mr.Hakeem of subverting the rule
of law to have an enjoining order issued against him overturned.
He also went on to accuse the SLMC leader of trying to sabotage
several public rallies that he and his supporters held in the east.
The accusations
were made in his rivals absence but two days later Mr.Hakeem used
the floor of the House to vent his outrage at his opponents for
using the personal vendetta against him to slander members of the
judiciary as well.
"He is
using the privilege of this House to make false accusations. He
has said the same thing outside. I have asked my lawyers to institute
contempt of court proceedings against him, he said.
Wednesday also
saw sittings suspended on two occasions, once for several minutes,
and the other for more than an hour after opposition MPs staged
a sit down protest in the well of the House after they objected
to the Board of Investment Bill, that Enterprise Development, Industrial
Policy and Investment Promotion Minister G.L. Peiris had presented
to the House, stating it was unconstitutional.
Speaker Joseph
Michael Perera overruled the opposition objections and the Bill
was passed in the House.
The Speaker
also took time to wish all legislators a happy new year but it was
Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe who gave them some food for
thought in the final speech to the House for 2002. "We on both
sides of the House must discuss in the coming year how to strengthen
this institution. Starting in January, we must take decisions on
how to amend the standing orders of Parliament so that we can change
the way that this House does business," he said.
|