So once more unto
Moragoda
Columnist
Rajpal Abeynayake chided me, albeit gently, last Sunday for being
too kind to Economic Reforms Minister Milinda Moragoda when I commented
on his Honolulu Homily recently.
Participating in a Asia
Pacific security conference in Honolulu, Hawaii Moragoda urged the
United States to take on the leadership of the world and lead us
all into the promised land of democracy, market economics and peace.
This troika
of values, says Moragoda, is precisely what the US constitution
seeks to protect and so we should all get together and hand over
the baton to Washington so that it can teach even recalcitrant nations
and leaders to dance to the strains of the stars and stripe.
In short, Moragoda
urges the US to be the world hegemon.
At the earlier
writing I had only read a brief report of Moragoda's panacea for
world terrorism and violence and was not privy to the full text.
I had, of course,
previously read another discourse by Milinda Moragoda. In that he
states that Sri Lanka should be to India what Hong Kong is to China.
Anybody who
has any understanding of the special symbiotic relationship between
Hong Kong and China could hardly conceive of a similar relationship
between the two South Asian neighbours. Moreover history seems to
have passed Moragoda by, for Hong Kong has been an integral part
of China for the past five years and so different from India and
Sri Lanka, two independent states with their own strengths and imperatives.
When he was
here in London a couple of months back I tried to meet him on this
very issue and indicated my interest officially. But, like history,
he passed by and the opportunity was lost.
Appropos the
Hawaiian hula hula, if I did let Moragoda down gently, as Abeynayake
believes, it was because I preferred to read his full speech before
further comment. In any case his motives did not overly concern
me, just his thoughts.
Even before
Moragoda's exhortation to all and sundry to read him in full, I
had obtained not only a copy of the Honolulu Homily but also of
the Lalith Athulathmudali Memorial Lecture given more recently,
both of which make interesting reading.
I once read
somewhere that Minister Moragoda, speaking to students of the Eastern
Province University, had said that colleagues considered him funny.
"My colleagues
think I am funny because I don't think of only one side. I think
of both sides of an issue," he was quoted as saying.
At the time
I could not quite imagine what was so funny about that. It seemed
only that he had funny colleagues.
But now having
read these two speeches, I understand what Moragoda means. He is
not funny ha ha, he is funny curious.
Moragoda claims
that "we" look to the US where the high principles enshrined
in its constitution "continue to shine forth as a beacon to
the rest of the world" and even quotes Margaret Thatcher in
support.
The constitution
is replete with laudable intentions and objectives written in fine
words. But does he seriously believe that a constitution represents
the reality of daily life?
While Moragoda
was extolling the virtues of the US constitution and all those high
principles such as the inalienable rights of the people, did he
not think of asking the Hawaiian people (not the people of Hawaii),
if any of them are still left, how their inalienable rights were
safeguarded? Did Moragoda, the economic reformer, even try to find
out about land ownership in Hawaii and who owns and runs big enterprises?
How many persons of Polynesian origin still own the large acres
of land their forefathers once cultivated and grazed their flocks?
Not one surely for they have all been dispossessed by whites from
mainland America.
And what happened
to the native Indians of America who were not only robbed of the
land but also of their heritage. What of the blacks brought into
the country as slaves, were sold as slaves and died as slaves? "All
men are created equal", says the US constitution at which Moragoda
is constantly burning incense. Indeed, except that some are more
equal than others.
Can Minister
Moragoda be so naive as to accept constitutions at their face value.
The Soviet constitution then and the Chinese constitution even today
promises several of the rights and freedoms that are enshrined in
the United Nations Charter and other international treaties. So
do the constitutions of several other countries. Yet we know that
basic freedoms such a political rights, right to free expression
and association and women's rights were, and are not, respected
and practised even today.
Minister Moragoda
ends his peroration by asking whether, if the US truly accepts world
leadership for "which its achievements unquestionably qualify
it", and if it treats its partners with respect and the restraint
that the powerful should show the less strong, then not only will
the world be a safe place, but foreigners will be following Americans
home like the rats ran after the Pied Piper.
The most overt
form of such an initiative,according to Moragoda, "is the proactive
fostering of democracy worldwide and the encouragement of free enterprise
and trade with the aim of promoting economic development and raising
the living standard of the peoples, all as the foundation of peace
and security". So has Moragoda convinced George W. Bush enough
for him to start with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait?
But Moragoda
carefully avoids any mention of rectifying the grave injustices
the US and its western imperialist partners have caused to millions
of people on this earth. Nor does he mention inhuman and imperialistic
policies that the US and the West are still pursuing with the intention
of subjugating countries and eliminating leaders they don't approve
of in the hope tightening the western stranglehold on the natural
resources, principally oil.
Moragoda wants
the US to foster democracy, blithely ignoring Washington's well
known history of overthrowing democratically-elected leaders- from
Mohamed Mossadeq in Iran to Salvador Allende in Chile, of fostering
dictators and puppet regimes from Dinh Diem of Vietnam, Pinochet
of Chile, Noriega of Panama, Marcos of the Philippines, several
military dictators of South Korea, Suharto of Indonesia, the Shah
of Iran and, of course, Saddam Hussein of Iraq who is now a "bad
guy". Should one not also mention Osama bin Laden, once hailed
by the CIA as a freedom fighter.
Washington's
manipulation of trade, its control and use of international institutions
such as the IMF and World Bank and its readiness to scuttle international
treaties whether on arms control or on environment are widely known
except perhaps to the Minister for Economic Reform who has not realised
the inherent danger to the developing world from his blatant salesmanship.
George W..
Bush reportedly went to Yale. What he did there is not very clear.
But this much he has learnt. He picks on the weak, like Iraq and
is ready to bomb it back to the stone for supposedly possessing
weapons of mass destruction. But he dare not do the same to North
Korea, an "evil state", which by its own admission has
a nuclear weapons programme and probably chemical and biological
weapons.
If he tries,
he will come up with a bloody nose as the Americans learnt during
the Korean War and later in Vietnam. So much for American leadership,
Minister Moragoda. Don't they don't teach such things at Harvard
Business School?
|