Mixed
reviews for the first year
The business community has given mixed reviews to the government’s
performance after one year in office. It seems that big business,
which has always preferred the United National Party to the Sri
Lanka Freedom Party, is happy with the performance of “their”
regime while small businesses, which actually make up the majority
of commercial enterprises, feel they are still neglected.
The success
of the cease-fire, which has held for one year, is greeted with
unanimous relief, although there are misgivings about where the
peace process will lead to and the ultimate shape of a solution.
Despite the government’s repeated pronouncements about its
concern for small and medium enterprises and the need to give them
a helping hand, the businessmen who represent this sector are clearly
unhappy with the government’s attitude towards them and the
incentives that are provided.
One of the main
concerns of small and medium enterprises is the fear that their
businesses will get destroyed by a flood of cheap Indian goods under
the Indo-Lanka free trade pact, given the lower production costs
on the sub-continent and the vast economies of scale Indian manufacturers
enjoy. This is a very real fear, which the government would be unwise
to ignore.
The chambers
which represent largely big business have said that the government
has spent the past year putting the country’s economic fundamentals,
which had gone haywire under the previous regime, on a sound footing,
laying the foundations for growth and prosperity in the years ahead.
They have pointed
out that there will be some inevitable hardship in the interim,
while the economy gets back into gear, and the need for an effective
social safety net to protect the very poor from the cruel inequities
of market capitalism.
As a Business
Environment Survey has shown, the 80 percent rise in the stock market,
the curtailment of inflation, cuts in interest rates and the stability
of the rupee, are all solid indicators of economic progress.
However, many
concerns remain, not the least of which is the corruption that seems
to be deeply ingrained in the social fabric of the country, the
continuing deterioration in ethical standards and in law and order
and the incompetence and inefficiency of government ministers and
bureaucrats. The public, which is being asked to tighten its collective
belt and put up with more hardship, cannot understand why they have
to put up with such a bloated Cabinet.
Despite the
hype surrounding this regime’s ‘technocratic credentials’
and the presence of high-profile ministers from the private sector
there are still serious questions about the administration’s
efficiency. The so-called pro-business government has turned out
to be not so efficient after all, although to be fair by the regime
it must be said that it had to face unrealistic expectations from
the public.
The government
also seems to be unwilling to take the tough decisions that would
really improve efficiency and seems to be unwilling to upset unionised
labour, despite its rightwing reputation. As the Ceylon Chamber
of Commerce rightly points out no real improvements can be made
until the country improves its productivity and thereby the competitiveness
of its industries.
Wage increases
that are not matched by improvement in productivity will result
in inflation and take away the very benefit that the wage earners
seek, it has said. Furthermore, the country is still saddled with
an abundance of holidays.
The question
of equity is also a nagging concern. If the fruits of market capitalism
cannot be felt and enjoyed by all, naturally it could lead to social
unrest of the type this country has witnessed before.
|