Economic reforms
and the correct 'mind-set'
(Excerpts
of the speech delivered by Dr. Wickrema Weerasooria at the 7th annual
oration 2002 of the Faculty of Taxation of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of Sri Lanka).
Resisting
reform: the blatant corruption at the Customs has withstood
all reform efforts.
|
Any person involved
in a reform agenda must have the correct 'mind-set'. Those entrusted
with the task must be reform driven! There must also be a sense
of urgency. This is because reforms of any kind are never popular.
Reforms affect people. Reforms often displace many of the people
involved in the reforms. The best example is privatisation, which
immediately involves downsizing and staff reductions.
Hence, there
is an inbuilt aversion to reform or an indifferent or go-slow attitude.
This applies to the very regulators and policy makers entrusted
to drive the reform agenda. The normal response is to set up a Committee
and build up documentation and files with several seminars and conferences
thrown in. The final implementation is lacking. The financial, monetary
and fiscal sector has not been an exception to this general rule.
However, with
my long experience in the public sector and as a former Secretary
of Plan Implementation, I can confidently state that meaningful
steps are being taken today to reform and strengthen the financial
sector.
Financial
sector reforms
The Prime Minister appointed a "Task Force" of
about eight to ten persons to prepare an Action-oriented Executive
Summary of about 20 - 25 pages.
Next, taking that 25-page Executive Summary as the base, the Prime
Minister set up what is now popularly called the Financial Sector
Reforms Committee (FSRC) to implement the Executive Summary with
any modifications or improvements as necessary. The FSRC is housed
and serviced by the Central Bank. It is chaired by the Central Bank
Governor, Mr. A.S. Jayawardena and when he is unable to be present,
by one of the two Deputy Governors. Mr. R. Paskaralingam Advisor
to the Prime Minister is a leading member of the FSRC. He attends
every meeting. No meeting is held without him and meetings which
are held every two weeks are fixed to suit him.
Exchange control
is being liberalised. The 'current account' transactions are already
free of control. The FSRC has recommended that 28 items of the 'capital
account' be also freed under existing law. Of these 28 items, nine
items were freed in the Budget of 6 November. It is for the Treasury
to free the others. The Exchange Control Act of 1953 is to be repealed
and replaced with a 'more friendly' Exchange Management Act where
exchange control offences, if any, are decriminalised in the sense
that any contravention will result in a civil penalty and not a
prosecution. The Finance Minister referred to this legislation in
the Budget. As an eminent lawyer he referred to those who contravene
or ignore the law as "errant citizens". I like that term.
It is more user friendly like errant schoolboys who play truant!
The Fiscal Management
(Responsibility) Law is now before Parliament.
In his budget speech, Mr. K.N. Choksy also spoke of an Economic
Management Law. We, at the FRSC, have not seen this law and it may
be coming from the Treasury. It has a limited but very useful objective.
It will impose strict time limits on ministries to submit annual
accounts and performance reports to the Ministry of Finance, commencing
from the financial year 2002.
Starting in
the third quarter of 2003, government departments who violate these
requirements will have their funding curtailed. Monetary law and
Banking Act amendments had been finalised before the FSRC was set
up and are now before Parliament. The main amendments to the Monetary
Law Act (MLA) is that the core-objectives of the Central Bank have
been changed to economic and price stability and financial system
stability.
Secondly, the
Monetary Board which now has three members (Governor, S/Treasury
and one other) is enlarged to five (Governor, S/Treasury and three
others). We should welcome this change. The Banking Act amendments
strengthen the supervisory and regulatory powers of the Central
Bank relating to licensing procedures, revocation of banking licenses,
amalgamations, liquidation and closure of banks, qualifications,
appointment and removal of bank directors and senior management.
In 1993, banks
were given special parate execution powers which are of a judicial
nature to recover immovable properties mortgaged as security for
loans. The non-performing loans of banks are the main problems.
Newspapers are now full of Board Resolutions selling mortgaged property
of defaulting debtors.
Over the past ten years, the special procedure under this parate
execution law became ineffective because of injunctions and enjoining
orders granted by Courts without notice to the Bank.
The amendments
to the law seek to overcome this problem. Also the special procedure
is being extended to all licensed banks - both commercial and specialised
including the foreign banks and licensed finance companies so as
to create a level playing field. All these institutions rely on
public deposits and willful defaulters of non-performing loans threaten
the security of the deposit base.
There are many other new financial instruments and methods of finance
which have become popular in developed countries where development
has been slow in Sri Lanka. We all know that it is computer technology
that is driving this development.
Among the new methods of financing which are complicated and exotic
but yet gaining ground are,
- Securitisation
generally and asset and mortgaged backed securitisation.
- Multi-lender
financing and syndicated loans.
- Sub-Participation
and Club loans.
- Large scale
equipment lease finance.
- New methods
of project and infrastructure financing.
- Receivables
and Asset and Inventory finance.
- Developments
in unsecured Financing such as negative pledges, personal property
securities and what are called "Dematerialised and Immobilised"
securities.
- Subordinated
debt, set-off and Netting.
- Derivatives,
Forward Contracts, Futures, Options and Swaps.
Drafting
new laws
In our reform
agenda we are conscious that the financial/monetary/banking sector
in Sri Lanka as elsewhere is driven almost entirely by the private
sector unlike for example like sectors such as education, health,
electricity, water supply etc. Hence we have advocated the following
guidelines when considering legislation. First, we ask do we require
legislation? Can't we do with non-legislative Codes of Conduct or
Memoranda of Understanding? If there has to be legislation, it should
be minimal, non-intrusive, facilitatory rather than regulatory,
and not establish bureaucratic statutory bodies that will become
a burden on the consolidated fund.
Also, the legislation
we are drafting must be user friendly and use plain English - although
today in the event of an inconsistency it is the Sinhala text that
prevails. Above all, any legislation must be drafted only with the
concurrence of all the stakeholders. Gone are the days when the
government could not care for the views of the private sector and
the professional bodies of the country such as your Institute.
Currently,
the incorporated body and the legal entity is not the Central Bank
but the Monetary Board. We have now appointed a small committee
of about seven bankers to put together a new Act and we hope to
complete the work by March 2003. The same committee will also formulate
a new Banking Act with necessary modifications. Any suggestions
or assistance from the Institute in the drafting of both these new
Acts (or for that matter, any other legislation in this area) will
be most welcome. The Central Bank invariably appoints external auditors
so members of this Institute are well aware of current shortcomings,
if any, in the legislation, which we can examine and overcome.
Laws on money
laundering, computer crime and electronic transactions have already
been enacted in most developed countries. According to the banks
and other card issuing agencies, like Visa/Master Card, there is
currently no law in Sri Lanka to cover credit card fraud and when
the Police investigate and offenders are prosecuted, they invariably
get acquitted for lack of proper laws and the offenders soon re-offend.
We have, with
the help of the banks, prepared legislation to overcome these loopholes.
As regards users of cards and ATM's and Banks, we have agreed in
principle to have a Code for Electronic Fund Transfers (ETF) similar
to the Codes used in countries like England and Australia. As an
initial step, we feel a Code is sufficient so that each customer
or user knows his liability for any unauthorised use, etc. For example,
if an unauthorised person or thief uses your card for what amount
are you liable?
Banking
code of conduct
The Sri Lankan banking industry is agreed about a banking
Code of Conduct between the bank and each customer. Though non-statutory,
the Code will be considered a contract between the bank and the
customer and may be contractually enforceable for any contravention
of the Code. We can with modifications, adopt the Indian Code on
this subject.
As regards
a banking ombudsman it is a different story. While most developed
countries have set up non-statutory banking ombudsman schemes, banks
here seem to be lukewarm about the idea and I have not witnessed
any support for it.
In summary,
the shopping list of new legislation is a new Monetary Law Act,
Banking Act, a new Exchange Control Management Act repealing the
current Act, improvements to Debt Recovery Law and Special Recovery
of non-performing loans, Criminal liability for the issue of cheques
without funds, Money Laundering law, Computer Crime and Electronic
Transaction Law, Prosecution for unauthorized use of Credit Cards
and ATMs, EFT Code of Conduct and Banking Code of Conduct.
There is one other law that I should mention here because it affects
all of you as well as Accountants.
The Minister
for Commerce and Consumer Affairs has obtained Cabinet approval
for a new Act called the Consumer Affairs Authority Act. Basically,
this new legislation will repeal and replace the following:
i. Consumer
Protection Act No. 1 of 1979.
ii. Fair Trading Commission Act No. 1 of 1987; and
iii. Control of Prices Act (Chapter 173).
The above new
Act will apply to banks and all financiers (including finance companies)
and all Accountants because "services" under the Act means;
Service of any description which is made available to actual or
potential users and includes:
a) banking,
financing, insurance, entertainment and shipping …."
b) Services provided by professionals including lawyers, doctors,
accountants, surveyors etc.
So look out,
because it is very easy to sue for breach of consumer protection
law. It is not like suing for breach of contract or in tort for
negligence. As I emphasised earlier, the greatest hope we have for
the success of the above Reform agenda is the keen interest and
driving force of the Prime Minister. Many people - mainly from the
private sector contact the P.M. He hears them and if they have a
good idea or request, Mr. Paskaralingam is asked to take it up at
the FSRC meeting.
ometimes, the
person or institution making the representation is invited to present
his or its views at the FSRC. This has happened successfully on
several occasions.
Another force that drives the FSRC is the IMF/World Bank Missions
and reports on Sri Lanka. As a part of the Peace dividend more such
Missions are arriving now.
IMF/World Bank
suggestions for reforms are highly technical but they are dispassionate
and worthy of close study for implementation - despite the cry now
so often heard that everything this government does, from the Budget
to other Reforms, is done on the dictates of these two international
institutions. Apart from the IMF/WB, there is also the ADB.
One must not
get involved in any reform agenda unless he is committed to the
task. You cannot be half hearted about it or be engaged in it just
to please others. Secondly, you must study how reforms in this sector
were conceived and implemented globally. I call it the requirement
of a necessary "mind-set".
Our ancestors
knew nothing of commerce, banking and finance or monetary or fiscal
policy that is now part of our economy. Sri Lankans were basically
an agricultural community with established service tenure systems.
Our caste system further strengthened the service tenure system.
It was only after the British conquest of 1796 that we learnt of
commerce, as we know it today and there was also no commercial development
in the island until after the coffee plantations commenced in the
early 1830s. Our first bank - a short-lived Bank of Ceylon - was
established in 1841. Prior to the British, the main exports from
Sri Lanka were spices, gems and elephants.
To put it more
bluntly, Sri Lankans were agriculturists, not traders. Thus, when
it comes to reforms in the financial/monetary/banking/ and fiscal
areas, we must be conscious of our 'restricted mind-set". If
we start from the year 1796, the year of the capture of Sri Lanka
by the British, most of us are at most only fourth generation 'entrepreneurs'
in financial matters. Even after Independence in 1948, there is
no "Sri Lankan innovations" we can boast of. We got world
status in One Day Cricket, and once we were the champions, we have
one bronze winner at the 2000 Olympics (Susanthika Jayasinghe) and
a silver winner at the Olympic Games of 1948.
Duncan White).
We have one world class internationally renowned judge and jurist
(Professor Weeramantry) and we have one Sri Lankan who headed an
International Organisation (UNCTAD), namely Dr. Gamini Corea. There
is also the world-renowned science fiction writer, Sir Arthur C.
Clarke who is now a distinguished citizen of Sri Lanka. We have
very little to boast about. We are weak at innovations but good
at imitation. The British not only colonized our country, they colonized
our minds. Our Parliament, our Laws, our Courts, our Banking/Financial
System, our Company Law, Partnerships, Agency, Sole Trading, Import/Export
systems, our Tax System, our Customs and Excise System, our Professions
whether it be Law, Medicine, Accountancy, Surveying, Marketing,
etc. etc. are all moulded on foreign concepts which are mainly British
based.
In the area
of Social Sector reforms and development, however, we have indeed
developed some of our own indigenous programmes - not borrowed or
copied from the West. For example - Sarvodaya (Social mobilisation),
Janasaviya (Poor-relief), Samurdhi (Poor-relief), Gamudawa (Housing),
Mahapola (Trade fairs and University scholarships) and Swarnabhoomi
(Land grants).
I earlier emphasised
'the mind set' necessary for reforms. We must be pragmatic/practical
in our approach and committed to the reforms. We don't want mere
'file carrying' members of committees who come only to mark their
attendance nor do we want people who only talk a lot and do not
follow up on decisions. There is also a sense of urgency.
Since this
audience consists mainly of accountants who live with figures, let
me conclude with some mind boggling figures of our current economy.
I have taken these figures at random. Money spent on education is
interesting. Rs. 6 billion is spent on our university education
system which is free. Nearly five times of that - Rs. 20 billion
goes out of Sri Lanka for education abroad and the tuition industry
costs add up to about another Rs. 20 billion.
As against
the above figures, take revenue derived from taxation. According
to Inland Revenue Report for 2000, of the total revenue collection
of Rs. 116 billion, only 22% came from income tax. Sri Lanka has
a work force of about 5 million (out of a total population of 19
million). Only 161,000 individuals pay income tax including individual
partners. Additionally about 213,000 persons pay tax through the
PAYE Scheme.
|