No
talks, no money: World Bank
By Feizal Samath
As the Sri Lankan government prepares to welcome a rush of donor
aid from the Tokyo summit in June, the World Bank cautioned against
expectations of heavy aid inflows saying disbursements would depend
on the progress of peace talks.
"If the momentum (of the peace talks) stalls … if it
goes backwards, the donors will react accordingly," noted Peter
Harrold, country director of the World Bank office in Sri Lanka.
His comments,
in an interview with The Sunday Times, were contrary to expectations
by the government and sections of the public of an enthusiastic
donor community pouring in funds into the battered northeast region
without waiting for a permanent, negotiated settlement to evolve
from ongoing peace talks.
"For donors
on the bilateral side (much more than the multilateral side), it
is the quality, depth and speed of the peace process that will determine
the quantity and speed of delivery of the (aid) commitments,"
the World Bank country director noted, while adding however that
it was necessary to invest now.
"I think
we have learnt in many other conflicts that if you wait to do anything
you might have to wait forever. Because if the benefits of peace
don't start to flow in terms of improved economic prospects then
it might increase the risks of a conflict breaking out again,"
he said.
But Mr. Harrold,
who has worked in conflict zones with a peace process like Sierra
Leone, pointed out that the support that had come in so far was
not very large. Apart from the World Bank and the Asian Development
Bank, there was very little money being spent in the north and the
east, he said.
Mr. Harrold
said the World Bank was opposed to double taxation in the north
and had expressed these concerns to the LTTE. "They have assured
us that projects financed by the World Bank which are to benefit
the poor in the north, will not be subject to any tax."
There were
instances in the case of bank contracts in the north where the bid
document also contained a tax the contractor said he would have
to pay the LTTE if he won the contract.
"This
is not acceptable. Aid is goods and services for the people, not
to finance governments or other organizations," Mr. Harrold
said.
He said the system of finance in the north must be sorted out during
the peace process otherwise it is bad for business and would create
uncertainty. |