Gulf war and cowboy capitalism

The achievements of corporate America are usually admired in many parts of the world that have similar economic systems, and American brands recognised in even the most remote and impoverished of countries. But the crude and arrogant manner in which the US administration is ignoring all norms of decency and established procedures in giving contracts to American companies in parts of Iraq it has invaded in the humanitarian aid and reconstruction effort is hardly the kind of behaviour that the rest of the world would like to emulate as a shining example of American capitalism.

Here in Sri Lanka there was much talk about, and calls to adopt measures similar to, the actions taken by the US to prevent the abuse of public trust that followed the spate of corporate scandals in America. This came after our own scandals such as the insider dealing fiasco at the Securities and Exchange Commission. The business community and the investing public looked to the US for guidance and inspiration and were much impressed by measures to improve governance and transparency in America's corporate society.

But now it looks as if the US is a country that does not care two hoots about breaking the rules or ignoring them when it suits their interests. Take the case of the contract to run the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr given to the US stevedoring firm SSA. The USAID, which awarded the contract, did not call for tenders ostensibly on the grounds of security and the need to fast track the work to repair and modernise the port. Does this mean that it is alright for the troops of America's allies such as Britain and Australia to fight alongside US forces but that British and Australian companies cannot be trusted? Or is it that the US is driven by sheer greed and a desire to keep the lion's share of the spoils to itself?

Another example of American double standards is the decision by the New York Stock Exchange to withdraw access to correspondents of Al Jazeera - the Arab satellite television station whose reports of the war have angered the Bush administration.

According to commodity experts the US is in dire need of crude oil with its oil production expected to fall by 12 percent in the next 20 years, while consumption is seen rising by about one third. Iraq has the world's second largest proven oil reserves, next to Saudi Arabia, although Central Asia and the Caspian Sea basin with vast unproven reserves is considered to be the Arabian Gulf of the 21st century.
It is very clear that it is American business interests that ultimately lie behind the fighting in Iraq. American defence factories have gone into overdrive to churn out the bombs and missiles raining down on Iraq and to replenish rapidly depleting stocks while US companies are likely to win contracts to dredge the Iraqi port and douse fires at oil wells sabotaged by retreating Iraqi forces. It is feared that US, and to some extent British companies, would eventually get the most lucrative business as well - to run the oil fields and refineries.

However, corporate America might eventually have to pay for its arrogance since there are signs of a backlash against US products in key markets. German children, considered the most enthusiastic consumers of American products, are said to be boycotting US brands such as McDonald's. In Berlin, restaurants have been taking American items off their menus and bars refusing to serve bourbon. Bicycle maker Riese und Mueller has cancelled orders with US suppliers. Meanwhile, the French are thinking of setting up their own CNN-type TV broadcasting station to give the rest of the world a less America-centric perspective on the news.

Reviewing Sri Lanka's economy last year

By S.S. Colombage, Professor of Social Studies, Open University of Sri Lanka

Modest recovery
The economy recovered modestly in 2002 recording a positive GDP growth of around 3 percent in contrast to minus 1.4 percent growth in the previous year. This recovery could be considered commendable. But I would like to make two observations. My first observation is on growth rate calculation. As the real GDP was on a low base in 2001 due to the minus growth rate experienced in that year, the growth rate for 2002 is bound to be higher, in any case. Leaving aside the year 2001, the GDP growth is only about 1.5 percent in 2002 over the year 2000.

Secondly, more than three-fourths of the GDP growth in 2002 came from service activities. In other words, agriculture and industry contributed less than one-fourth of the GDP growth. As an economy grows, the services sector tends to expand. But the growth is not sustainable without an accompanying real output growth in agriculture and industry.

In the context of political and economic uncertainties faced by the economy in recent times, entrepreneurs seem to have moved their investment from long-term production ventures to short-term, highly profitable activities such as the import trade, property sales, etc. As a result, trading activities have grown rapidly. Even the foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows, sponsored by the Board of Investment (BOI) with so many incentives, now seem to have been diverted to service activities like establishing recreation centres, entertainment complexes, etc. The authorities have failed to attract FDI for high-tech high and value added industrial ventures, which are very much needed to elevate the economy. Although FDI inflows increased in 2002, such receipts continue to remain as low as about one-fifth of the private remittances, received mainly from the Middle East workers.

Meanwhile, the low interest rate policy of the Central Bank has enabled commercial banks and other financial institutions to raise their profitability by pushing down the deposit rates offered to their customers, while keeping the lending rates more or less at the same level. As profits are included in the value added in GDP computations, the higher the profits the higher the value added of such sectors. These are some of the major reasons for the increased contributions of service activities to GDP growth.

Declining productivity
The economy is on a downward path since 1998 reflecting an average annual growth rate of only about 2.5 percent since then. Apart from the domestic political tensions, various other factors are responsible for the growth slowdown. Continuous decline in productivity is a major factor. The industrial sector has experienced a drop in labour productivity in recent years, according to Central Bank estimates. Low savings and investment also retarded GDP growth.

Unemployment up

In the context of the low economic activities, the unemployment rate rose to 10 percent of the labour force in 2002. This invariably leads to a rise in the poverty level. Moreover, real wages, defined as money wages adjusted for consumer price changes, declined in the sectors of industry, commerce and service activities in 2002 due to high consumer prices.

In 2002, exports fell and imports increased. This led to widen the trade deficit to $ 1,400 million. Fortunately, we received private remittances, mainly from the Sri Lankans working in Middle East countries, to the tune of almost $ 1,000 million. This greatly helped to contain the current account deficit of the balance of payments to $ 500 million. Otherwise, the foreign exchange crisis would have been worse. If we exclude private remittance inflows, the current account deficit is about 9 percent of GDP instead of the actual ratio of 3 percent. This clearly shows the contribution made by the workers abroad.

Inflation impact

Inflation declined from 14 percent in 2001 to 9.6 percent in 2002, and this was a favourable development. But this trend does not seem to last long, as inflation has already picked up this year. Also, we should be mindful of the fact that the official inflation rate is an underestimated one due to the outdated consumer basket used in the Colombo Consumer Price Index. Inflation has a multitude of adverse effects on living conditions, real incomes, export competitiveness, savings, investment, etc.

In particular, inflation creates uncertainty among investors. As I mentioned earlier, investors attempt to make a fast buck by engaging in trading activities rather than investing in long-term projects. This partly explains the rapid growth of service activities relatively to agriculture or industry. The vicious circle of rising prices, rising wages, rising production costs, weak export competitiveness, and exchange rate depreciation is haunting the economy. For instance, the Central Bank allowed a free-float rupee system in January 2001 to restore export competitiveness. But as I predicted then, that objective was not realized due to the high inflation, and the beneficial effects gained from the rupee depreciation is already eroded by now. This is why the export sector is on a downward path at present.

Spending cuts

The government's fiscal operations showed an improvement in 2002 with a lower budget deficit of 8 percent of GDP, compared with 11 percent in the previous year. But this was achieved mainly by cutting down capital expenditure, which is essential to boost economic development. With the continuous budget deficits over the years, the government had to rely heavily on borrowings from domestic and foreign sources. As a result, the accumulated public debt stock now amounts to 105 percent of GDP.

Savers hit

Monetary policy has focused on reducing inflation and ensuring financial stability. For this purpose, the Central Bank has been increasingly relying on open market operations. The Central Bank has reduced its two policy rates, namely the Repurchase (Repo) rate and Reverse Repurchase (Reverse Repo) rates on a number of occasions in recent times claiming that the inflation rate is coming down. Also, it is envisaged that this policy stance would help to reduce the lending rates of commercial banks and other financial institutions, and thereby boost investment. But the outcome is rather different.

Commercial banks have reduced the interest rates offered to their depositors substantially, but not the interest rates charged from their borrowers. According to the Central Bank figures, the weighted average deposit rate declined from 10.5 percent in 2001 to 7.2 in 2002, while the weighted average lending rate remained at 18.3 percent in 2002, which is marginally lower than 19.8 percent in 2001. As a result, the interest margin of commercial banks, which is the difference between the interest income and interest expenses, rose from 9.3 in 2001 to 11.1 percent in 2002. Consequently, most commercial banks recorded very high profits last year, despite the slow GDP growth. As these profits are treated as value added in GDP computations, the banking sector made a big contribution to GDP growth in 2002, as I mentioned earlier. Meanwhile, savers have become losers, as deposit rates offered by financial institutions are much lower than the inflation rate. For instance, the annual yield rate of 12-month Treasury Bills is around 9 percent as against the current inflation rate of 11 percent, leaving a real interest rate of minus 3 percent. In other words, savers receive a negative real interest of 3 percent. This kind of interest rate structure is detrimental to savings.

Who's responsible?

I would like to conclude my lecture with a statement of the Central Bank, appearing in one of its recent publications. It states,

"(In 2002), It appears that economic growth, investment expansion and surplus in the Balance of Payments would be lower, while inflation, unemployment, budget deficit, public sector borrowing, public debt burden and monetary expansion would be higher in relation to expectations at the beginning of the year, as well as compared with the desired targets. These deviations are mainly due to factors, such as a continuing weak export demand, unfavourable terms of trade and the lagged effect of the severe drought and terrorist attacks experienced in 2001, all beyond the control of policy makers. ...". Source: (Recent Economic Developments, Nov. 2002)

This simply means that the policy makers are not responsible for any malfunction of the economy, and the exogenous or external factors are to be blamed. I am leaving it to you to make a judgement on this statement.

(This article is an abridged version of a public lecture delivered by Prof. Colombage at a seminar of the Sri Lanka Economic Association held at the University of Colombo on March 20.)

Chari de Silva hands over the baton

By Thushara Matthias
Chari de Silva, one of Sri Lanka's most accomplished business professionals, handed over the baton last month to a younger generation, ending a career spanning 48 years in which he served on the country's best companies and boards.

March was a particularly sad month for many employees at Lanka ORIX Leasing Company Ltd, Sri Lanka's first leasing company, when he stepped down as its chairman after a 23-year stint.

It was in 1955, that de Silva, then 17 years, started his career as an accountant at Caltex Ceylon Ltd. Though he had a BSc (Hons) degree from the University of Colombo, he was also qualified in a totally different field - Chartered Accountancy.

Asked why he switched streams, he said: "C.P.L. de Silva, my eldest brother who was a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo at that time - persuaded me to take up accountancy. I think it was the financial stability associated with it that would enable me to marry the girl of my choice." When Caltex was taken over by the government, he joined Aitken Spence and Co Ltd as Chief Accountant and climbed the corporate ladder to become its chairman in 1972.

When he recalls the happiest times in his career, the diversification and expansion of this old and established company under his guidance are among the satisfying periods in his career.

Asked about his other happiest moments, de Silva smiles humbly, thinks for a moment and says it is his marriage and when the Japanese government bestowed on him the Order of the Rising Sun, Gold and Silver Star. It was the highest ever honour that was given to a Sri Lankan or for that matter any foreigner.

De Silva considers the role that he played in persuading the UNP government to abandon its proposed legislation to introduce worker participation in ownership, management and profit sharing, as an important milestone in his life.

That legislation would have been disastrous for the private sector. In 1980, at a time when small entrepreneurs had no choice but a bank loan or hire purchase to acquire a productive asset, the IFC (the World Bank private sector window) suggested the need for a leasing industry.

"At that time, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) wanted the Bank of Ceylon (BOC) to initiate the industry and they needed a private sector man to lead it. They chose me for the job as the Chairman of the first ever-leasing company in Sri Lanka when I was serving as the Director at BOC," he recalled.

The Orient Leasing Company (OLC) of Japan, the world's largest independent leasing company had a 30 percent stake and IFC 15 percent in the newly established Lanka Orient Leasing Company Ltd, now known as Lanka ORIX Leasing Co Ltd or LOLC.

De Silva calls the LOLC a "model company". From the inception he had the opportunity of moulding the institution in the exact way he desired resulting in LOLC being one of the market leaders in the leasing industry. De Silva says that he enjoyed creating LOLC as a model institution because at Aitken Spence he was only able to improve it, not change it altogether, as it was a very old institution.

Speaking on the importance of the leasing industry to the nation, he says, "The back bone of any country is the small and medium businessmen. Leasing is a means of enabling them to acquire productive valuable assets." The leasing industry should grow with time. The ADB and the World Bank too has recognized 'leasing' as a vital component of any economy.

De Silva has held many distinguished positions such as the Chairmen of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Ceylon Chamber of Commerce, Employers' Federation of Ceylon and president of the Asian Leasing Association, Singapore, Sri Lanka-Japan Business Cooperation Committee, National Council of the International Chamber of Commerce, Contract Bridge Federation of Ceylon and the Director of Bank of Ceylon, State Rubber Manufacturing Corporation, Bata Shoe Company of Ceylon, a member of many commissions and committees. Internationally he was the third President of the Asian Leasing Association, and a director of the International Chamber of Commerce, Paris.

Educated at Royal College, de Silva says emotional intelligence (EI) is the key to a successful career and attributes his own success to EI.

Apart from listening to classical music, the veteran businessman also loves reading and playing bridge and chess which he hopes to pay more attention during retirement.


Back to Top  Back to Business  

Copyright © 2001 Wijeya Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Webmaster