Looking behind the 'donor conference' façade
Never before in the history of human conflict has so much been owed
by so many to so few. In terms of hard cash that is. Last week's
donor conference in Japan was the most extravagant example of that
and of course there were exultant reports that a record amount of
aid has been drummed up at this conference 'despite the non-participation
of the LTTE."
Funny.
When the first donor conference was announced a few months into
the ceasefire and the peace talks, there were howls of protests
that the LTTE was being allowed a look-in at the donor conference
at all. The government was accused of carrying the LTTE on its lap,
and conferring international legitimacy on what was a pariah organisation.
In other words, the LTTE was damned for its participation at the
donor conference.
Today, the LTTE
is damned for its non participation at the donor conference. Their
not being there is being called a great betrayal, and most of the
time by people who saw their being there, in the first place, as
a glaring affront.
Anyway, whatever
this was, this was not a donor conference, for the simple reason
that it was not all about money. There were reams written about
the amount of aid received - a record 4.5 billion US dollars, it
was said. But why so much money in a country which had utilized
only 14 per cent of all the aid that was received in the year before
last, for instance? That percentage was raised to 18 per cent last
year, for example, and even that increase of 4 percentage points
was heralded as a major achievement by Finance Minister K.N. Choksy.
If 18 per cent
is the overall utilisation of aid, what is the major achievement
in receiving an 'unprecedented' 4.5 billion USD in aid? Chances
are that a major part of it will go unused, because it is not conceivable
that there will be a drastic increase in the percentage of aid utilisation
in one year. If a boy says his pocket money was raised from Rs.
20 to Rs. 100, it doesn't make a lollipop's difference to him if
all he gets to spend out of that 100 is still a little more than
Rs. 20, right?So the donor conference was not about money.
But it was an
entirely different matter that the pretence was that it was about
money, and that basically the country's soul was on sale, because
a great spectacle was made out of the fact that we are owing to
various countries, and that we want to owe more to them.
To me, at least,
quite apart from the complex, if not convoluted politics that is
involved with the donor conference, the spectacle of a respectable
leadership having to make a great show of getting handouts, was
a sorry show in itself. This is of course apart from the political
needs that arose from this donor conference.
Basically, this
whole Tiger business has taken us from being an owing and borrowing
country into being a conspicuous 'international basket case' because
our whole political leadership was basically almost having to physically
genuflect at the altar of international funding in Tokyo. To a great
many, this was the 'symptom' of a country's malaise. All that sickening
genuflecting in Tokyo (and the "hurrah we are very successful
beggars this time'' cheering squads) was symptomatic of the fact
that as a nation we have been quite hard done by because of this
war, and all that has followed as a result of it.
But, the real
malaise in fact was the aid conference. Internationally, we are
hard done by, and we have been hard done by always, and our war
is often the excuse and the instrument that the so called international
community has used to fix us. Now, taken as a statement in itself,
no doubt that may sound like a diatribe!
The international
neo liberal economic order, the World Bank and the IMF financial
culture has drastically limited our options; on top of it we are
saddled with a conflict that is often not being allowed to be settled
on our own terms because the international community keeps getting
involved.
As for direct
involvement, we have of course technically had only the Indian involvement,
which effectively stopped a successful push for an end to the war
with the Vadamarachchi campaign. We are not talking of a specific
time or a specific instance, but regional proxies we know are often
made willing or unwilling proxies by bigger powers. Or the bigger
powers say "let the conflict be solved according to the way
the regional powers want it.''
Either way the
fact remains that we cannot solve this conflict on our own terms,
and if somebody says the Sri Lankan forces have been incompetent
and have not been able to win the war, and that both the Tigers
and the Sri Lankan government have not been able to forge a lasting
peace, they are telling only half the truth.
Now, the instances
may have been few and far between -- but there have been a few openings,
when the resolution of the conflict was within sight, either by
war or by relatively peaceful means. But international factors,
international 'concerns', international 'safety nets' always intervened.
It can't be documented in one or even ten articles; but the fact
is that the international community always dictated such things
'as a meaningful negotiated settlement' and acted often as a safety
net, not for the Sri Lankan government, but for the LTTE, that they
too finally came to label as 'terrorist'.
The worst joke
is that now we have to be a basket case in the international media
glare, genuflect at a 'donor conference' which is supposed to be
a gigantic favour being done to this nation. A jeremiad it may sound,
but the truth is we have had to sell our soul and dignity, and in
a very telling way at that, last week. And the even worse joke is
that that's being called the symptom our troubles, when in the larger
picture that is the disease.
We are not the
classic international basket case even though we may appear to be
-- we are the classic international victim. Which is all the more
reason the Tigers and the Sri Lankan government should get together
and solve this crisis -- on their own terms.
|