|   Engineers 
              see snags in CEB reforms  
              By Shelani Perera 
              The CEB Engineers Union is protesting over the Board decision to 
              begin the restructuring of the CEB on October 1, stating that practical 
              issues need to be solved first. 
             The CEB is 
              to be restructured with the Lanka Electricity Company (LECO) and 
              the CEB being merged and restructured to form six companies. A union 
              spokesperson said human resources issues need to be solved before 
              going for the restructure. 
             "We are 
              not against the reforms. The CEB is in a financial and administrative 
              mess. Without resolving these issues we should not go for a merger,” 
              he said. CEB Chairman S Zubair said once the Public Utility Commission 
              appointments were made by the Constitutional Council, the Prime 
              Minister's Office will appoint the officials to the six companies. 
              He said the seventh company would be set up later for the North 
              and East. 
             CID 
              probes massive garment quota fraud  
              By Shanika Udawatte 
              The CID is probing a fraud amounting to Rs. 5.5 million which had 
              gone unnoticed due to the alleged negligence of Textile Quota Board 
              officials. 
              According to CID officials, a manager of GJM garments had been appointed 
              by the company officials as the representative of the company who 
              would deal with matters relating to quotas and the Quota Board. 
              On June 14, 2003 the manager had left the country for official business. 
            Taking advantage 
              of this situation, an employee of GJM garments had allegedly forged 
              the signature of the manager and sent a letter to the Quota Board 
              on June 16 appointing him as the representative between the company 
              and the Quota Board. On the same day he had made an application 
              to transfer a garment quota worth over Rs. 5 million (CAT 352/052 
              45,000 dzs ) to SlimLine garments. Once the approval for the transfer 
              had been received from the Quota Board he had handed it over to 
              a quota broker. The quota broker has obtained cheques totalling 
              Rs. 5.5 million from SlimLine garments for handing over the quota 
              to the company. He had also encashed these cheques.  
            The Sunday Times 
              learns that the Quota Board officials are also under investigation 
              since the normal procedure to compare the signature of a company 
              representative against the specimen signature sent by that company 
              to the Quota Board, appears to have been overlooked, CID sources 
              said.  
            The Sunday Times 
              learns that there are noticeable differences between the specimen 
              signature of the manager and the forged signature in the letter 
              sent to the Quota Board by the employee. This has caused suspicion 
              about the actions of the Quota Board officials. The CID has also 
              learnt that the two suspects had paid an executive officer of another 
              garment factory connected with SlimLine garments, over Rs. 500,000 
              as a commission to aid them in carrying out the fraud.  
            CID investigations 
              to trace the Rs. 5.5 million are under way. Sources said about one 
              million rupees had been detected so far. The forged documents are 
              to be presented to the Examiner of Questioned Documents for a detailed 
              repor. The suspects who have been remanded will be produced for 
              an identification parade on July 16, in the Fort Magistrate's court. 
            Suspects 
              speak of JVP link in Vijaya assassination case 
              The trial of Vijaya Kumaratunga assassination case was fixed for 
              October 6 by Colombo High Court Judge Kuma Ekaratne this week. The 
              first suspect Virantha Mudiyanselage Dhanapala alias Pala who was 
              indicted this week was released on Rs. 500,000 cash bail with two 
              sureties. 
             Dhanapala and 
              another suspect identified as Thuraisamy Shrikanthan told Maradana 
              police in 1998 that some JVP members, who were introduced to them 
              by a friend, had asked them to keep a gun and a motorcycle with 
              them. 
             The suspects 
              said they made arrangements for the motor cycle, a red Honda, to 
              be parked at the residenc of a friend, Anto, and the gun which had 
              initially been kept under the bed of Dhanapala had thereafter been 
              transferred to the house of another friend Samantha. 
             The suspects 
              had stated they were unaware as to the purpose of keeping the motorcycle 
              or gun until they heard it on the news that Vijaya had been killed. 
              The killers had subsequently come and left the motorcycle and the 
              gun with the friends of the accused, Anto and Samantha. 
             The two accused 
              had been under great pressure from Anto and Samantha who were keeping 
              the items, to dispose of them. This they had done by abandoning 
              the motor cycle near the Kalubowila hospital, after removing the 
              number plates, but kept the side mirrors with Dhanapala and palming 
              the gun of to a man known to Shrikanthan. He was identified as Koombikele 
              Dharme. 
             Dhanapala had 
              also stated that nearly a year prior to the killing he had undergone 
              training by the JVP in a camp in the outskirts of Matugama where 
              he was taught to handle a weapon and to shoot.  
            The two accused 
              were indicted in the High Court on June 2 for causing evidence pertaining 
              to the killing of Vijaya Kumaratunga to disappear, that is, causing 
              the disappearance of the motorcycle and a gun which were the evidence 
              of the Kumaratunga murder, with the intention of shielding the offender 
              from legal punishment, knowing or having reason to believe that 
              during the period of February 16-18, 1988, Vijaya Kumaratunga's 
              murder (an offence punishable under Section 296 of the Penal Code) 
              has been committed.  |