Kadir warns
India of Tiger threat
Former Foreign
Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar during a visit to India has cautioned
that Trincomalee is vulnerable to attacks by the LTTE.
"I am
seeking to sensitise India to the looming danger (from the LTTE)
particularly to the port of Trincomalee. The port of Trincomalee
is today ringed by the LTTE," Mr. Kadirgamar told the Hindu
newspaper in an interview.
Mr. Kadirgamar
said the Trincomalee oil tanks, now leased to India, were vulnerable
as there were no security contingents nearby.
Some personnel
from the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) were already in the area,
he pointed out. Mr. Kadirgamar had claimed that the Tigers had put
up 11 "bases" around the southern rim of the port after
the "ceasefire" with the Sri Lankan Government. "Artillery
pieces have also been spotted. The oil tanks which are situated
near the China Bay are totally vulnerable... there are some IOC
personnel already there," he said.
The Hindu report
said:
Mr. Kadirgamar,
who has had meetings with External Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha,
and National Security Adviser Brajesh Mishra, said that any damage
done to the Sri Lankan Navy in Trincomalee could well cut the supply
line to the Palali base in the Jaffna peninsula.
"I believe
that the Indian Government is now alert to this danger. Because
any threat to Sri Lanka must surely constitute a threat to India's
legitimate, sovereign interests in the Indian Ocean."
On the current
peace process in Sri Lanka, Mr. Kadirgamar said India was not seeking
any role.
"India
has no intention of being a mediator or facilitator... India has
always said, rightly said, that it would like to see a negotiated,
peaceful settlement of the problem. So do we...
"The question
is the price. I do not believe that India can tolerate a separate
state... India has a legitimate interest in whatever constitutional
arrangement that is going to be reached in Sri Lanka in addition
to a legitimate interest about the situation on the ground,"
he said.
Asked about
the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, Jayalalithaa's warning against going
through with the land bridge project between India and Sri Lanka
as well as the ferry service, Mr. Kadirgamar said the land bridge
idea was "wholly premature".
"It will
be enormously expensive and I fully understand and appreciate Ms.
Jayalalithaa's security concerns. As to the ferry, it will have
to be handled with great care. At this point of time, security considerations
cannot be dispensed with."
Any talk of
free and easy access between the two countries, particularly Tamil
Nadu, was not feasible, he added.
Referring to
the ground situation, Mr. Kadirgamar said that daily killings of
political opponents by the Tigers continued not just in Jaffna but
also in Colombo. Though it was being argued that the LTTE's chief
negotiator in the interrupted peace process, Anton Balasingham,
was unwell, it appeared that he had been sidelined by LTTE chief
Velupillai Prabhakaran.
To an extent,
Mr. Balasingham was a voice of moderation that was prepared to drive
a hard bargain for a negotiated settlement. Today, it was S.P. Thamilselvan
who was being promoted and Mr. Balasingham was not expected to attend
an "internal" Tiger meeting in Paris. "All the signs
are that Mr. Balasingham will not participate in the Paris meeting,"
he said.
On the Ranil
Wickremesinghe Government's proposal for an interim administration,
Mr. Kadirgamar maintained that such a move would only "legitimise"
the LTTE. Linking an interim administration to a final solution,
he claimed that there had been no talks, so far, on the core issues
relating to the ethnic dispute. Not even the duration of such a
dispensation had been spelt out.
In his view,
the LTTE had walked out of the peace process because of the "links"
that the international community had made between reconstruction
funds and stress on principles of pluralism, demilitarisation and
non-recruitment of child soldiers. "The Tigers saw Tokyo as
a conspiracy to impose an agenda on it from the outside," Mr.
Kadirgamar said.
"The LTTE
did not want to offer any such commitment." Its claim to be
the "sole representative" of the Tamil people in a democratic
set-up was not acceptable, he added.
|