Please
don't call tourism names
By Random Access Memory (RAM)
The late Robertson R. Collins, a one time Chairman of the Development
Authority of the Pacific Asia Travel Association (PATA), US ICOMOS
(International Council on Monuments and Sites) and a key influencer
responsible for the conservation of the old quarter buildings in
Singapore, the living heritages of Nepal and several other places,
once noted that we must not call tourism names.
Citing the
myriad of names tourism operators have coined such as nature tourism,
sustainable tourism, eco tourism, adventure tourism, people-based
tourism, village tourism, cultural tourism, Robbie said "these
names often confuse the real essence of tourism and make us believe
that we are doing all the right things, when in fact we are not.
We take solace in the fact that we have put a label on and make
believe that the label fits what we do". Recognizing the need
for brand identities, he said "If you must call tourism a name,
call it Good Tourism, for all tourism must be sustainable, eco friendly,
utilise cultural and heritage resources sensitively, fully benefit
the host communities and be a profitable business for those who
run it and for those for whom it is run."
In the mid-1960's
Pannell, Kerr and Foster of Hawaii, prepared Sri Lanka's first ever
Tourism Master Plan, and identified Bentota, Koggalla, Trincomalee
and Passikudah to be developed as planned resorts. The plan also
proposed a simple rule of thumb guideline for coastal tourism facilities
development. It said that no hotel constructed on the coasts of
Sri Lanka should be taller than a coconut tree. Today, we reap the
benefits of this simple yet profound guideline in Bentota, Negombo
and other coastal resorts not being a Waikikki (Hawaii), Pattaya
(Thailand) or Gold Coast (Australia) type high-rise jungles by the
beach.
The Prime Minister
this week called on the development of the Galle Fort for tourism
and diversifying Sri Lanka's tourism offering, as the way forward
strategy to ensure that Sri Lanka gets the highest yield possible
from tourism. He mentioned one million tourists in five years, focusing
not on the numbers but on quality. Indeed, high spending tourists
sensitive to our heritage, culture and nature are what we need to
aim for in a peaceful Sri Lanka of the future. But we must also
not rule out the sensitive visitors and the youth, who may not be
big spenders now, but are explorers and discoverers of destinations.
In Nepal, the dictum in the sixties was 'Today's hippie may be tomorrows
CEO'. And in many cases, it was so.
In RAM's mind
we need to look elsewhere to determine the real issues on why Sri
Lanka gets low yields from tourism. We went through long periods
of uncertainty in the past twenty years when survival was the key
need of the tourism industry. In that scenario, we embraced the
phenomenon of All-inclusive Tours where the 'low end of the spectrum'
tourists came on cheap prepaid tours. Upon arrival on chartered
aircraft they were greeted at the hotel receptions with different
coloured tags put on their wrists. These tags similar to those worn
by patients in hospitals indicated what different things these holiday
makers were entitled to during their stays. How many beers they
could have, if breakfast, lunch or dinner was included, the class
of room for stay were determined through the tag they each wore.
These All-inclusive tours are known not only to bring low-end holiday
makers to destinations but also to result in foreign exchange leakages
of substantial proportions. In Sri Lanka still, a near one-third
of our tourism operates on this basis. In several countries this
kind of tourism is banned.
Leakages also
happen in the manner in which foreign investments come in. We need
to ensure that those who lease our land and assets for tourism operations
do not become mere gold diggers. There must be ways to determine
that real funds in the form of foreign exchange come into the country
and that a substantial part of it stays behind to pay for the real
value of the assets utilised.
In our quest
for the fast buck, we must not tag our heritage on a cheap sale.
In the new positioning of enabling visitors to discover the 'Spirit
of Travel' in Sri Lanka, we need to stay focused and be on the right
platform. Serendipity, spirit and discovery will certainly not mix
well with racecourses, theme parks and casino cities on a positioning
platform. It is important that we discover ourselves to enable others
to discover us.
We must not
forget that tourism is a fast return on investment activity that
can bring much benefit to communities. This should not be in the
form of the host communities being mere wage workers in the industry,
'Beach Boy' hangers on or sellers of wares. Host communities must
be able to participate in tourism development directly as stakeholders.
The true essence
of 'eco tourism' is indeed not tourism operations that are carried
out in the wilderness with a label put on it. In our quest for moving
upmarket, we also need to explore options to develop a participatory
type of tourism, which will also result in good returns in the future.
High-end visitors often look for experiences different to those
of the 'within the box' models we are accustomed to today. |