Camp
of contention
Two teenage Tamil guerrillas armed with a Light Machine Gun (LMG)
and a Russian built AK 47 stand guard at the main entrance on the
road leading to the controversial camp in the Manirasakulam area,
also known as the Kuranku Panchaankulam area of the Trincomalee
district.
They are guarding
the entry point to a camp which has turned out to be a thorny issue
in the peace process and which the Scandinavian monitors have been
unsuccessfully trying to remove over the past 10 weeks. The two
guards are supported by another guerrilla armed with a sniper gun
and on the lookout for possible encroachers.
Even SLMM representatives,
who when in Colombo claim they had free access to the camp, were
seen being turned away by the guerrillas manning the camp. "This
is a sensitive political issue. Each party is trying to gain maximum
political advantage and we have a limited mandate," Trinco's
SLMM representative Preben Rasmussen told The Sunday Times before
getting into his vehicle to head back to Trincomalee.
The camp is
an important transit point for the guerrillas who move between the
eastern province and the northern province. There were reports that
about 500 guerrillas had been trained at the camp before crossing
over to the Wanni region, early this week.
At least 400
more were reportedly undergoing training at the camp, situated amidst
a thick forest frequented by elephants. No one is allowed into the
camp, except for the guerrillas who are brought in for training
before being shifted to the east.
"This
area belongs to the LTTE and we will not shift from this location,"
the leader of the camp identified as Illampili told The Sunday Times.
The fact that the LTTE had expanded its observation points situated
ahead of the camp, was a clear indication that it had no intention
of moving from the location.
But government
officials and military officers based in the area have a different
story. A government official who wished to remain anonymous told
The Sunday Times that on March 23 a meeting was conducted for farmers
under a Tamarind tree where the camp is currently located.
"How could
we have had a meeting if the LTTE was occupying that area,"
he asked.
He said after the meeting both, Muslim and Tamil civilians had moved
into the area to begin cultivation and animal husbandry.
Military authorities
in the area were first informed about the controversial camp on
June 11 when a group of farmers had alerted them about some suspicious
movements. Little by little more reports filtered in regarding the
movement of goods and weapons.
But the hard
evidence came when the army visited the location on June 23 and
observed the construction of the camp. Since then the Norwegian
facilitators have also entered the fray but with little success
at getting the camp removed.
The Military
believes that the LTTE had set up the camp for two reasons. One
as a transit point and the other to prevent the Muslims, who had
fled the area in 1990, from returning. If they returned the military
would be called to establish security posts around the area. The
camp is said to be located in an area once known to have been a
predominantly Muslim village, Barakathnagar.
The settlement
was established by a former deputy minister Abdul Majeed who served
during the tenure of the late President J.R.Jayewardene. Over 200
Muslim families had been settled there while the adjoining village,
Sungankulam was a predominantly Tamil village.
However in
1990, due to the intense fighting between guerrillas and the security
forces, civilians abandoned the area. Only after the signing of
the ceasefire agreement people showed interest in returning.
Currently the
military has one of its camp four kilometres away from the LTTE
camp
An officer told The Sunday Times that they had intercepted an LTTE
transmission that gave instructions to cadres to prevent any movement
by the Army.
The surrounding
areas of the controversial camp could be cultivated, but civilians
are reluctant to return to their original lands. Further away from
the camp villagers live in abject poverty. We passed one school
that had only one teacher for all the students.
In one of the schools there was only one teacher for the whole school
as we passed the place. The teacher was teaching some eight students.
No entry
for SLMM
The Sunday Times witnessed Trincomalee's SLMM representative Preben
Rasmussen who attempted to enter the controversial Manirasakulam
camp on Wednesday being turned away by a young Tamil guerrilla manning
the sentry point of the camp.
As soon as
the monitoring mission vehicle driven by a Tamil speaking local
co-ordinator headed towards the camp the guerrilla manning the sentry
point was seen rushing towards the vehicle in a bid to prevent it
from proceeding towards the camp. He was followed by a guerrilla
carrying a sniper gun.
Immediately
the boy got onto his communication set to contact the head of the
camp. His response was quick, 'Awangal Nippatu, Nippatu', was the
order from within. (stop them, stop them).
The SLMM duo
waited for nearly 15 minutes in the vehicle and the Scandinavian
representative later alighted from the jeep. After failing in their
attempts to get a response from within the camp they left the location.
Meanwhile SLMM
representatives met LTTE's Trincomalee district political wing leader,
Tilak on Friday and expressed their dissatisfaction over the LTTE's
failure to withdraw from the camp.
SLMM spokesperson,
Agnes Bragadottir told The Sunday Times that Tilak had told the
SLMM representative that the LTTE was not willing to leave the camp.
This
is our home, we will not leave
Illampuli, the Tamil guerrilla in charge of the Manirasakulam camp
spoke to The Sunday Times over a communication set from within the
camp. Following are excerpts:
How long has
the LTTE been in this area ?
A: We have been here since the war started and we consider this
our 'home'. We will not vacate the location.
But, the Army
and the SLMM say that the LTTE camp was set up after the signing
of the ceasefire agreement.
A: We have evidence to prove that we have been here for a much longer
period.
There are also
allegations that you are occupying the lands of the Muslims and
not allowing them to return ?
A: We have not prevented the Muslims from returning to the area
to carry out their cultivation.
The land belongs
to the Muslims and Tamils. Therefore there is no question about
people returning to the area. In previous years people have cultivated
and reaped their harvest without any problems.
Why is the
LTTE not allowing the SLMM to enter the camp
A: The monitors visit the camp regularly and they are free to do
so any time.
(However The Sunday Times observed an SLMM representative being
turned away at the LTTE sentry point)
There are allegations
that the LTTE is using heavy weapons in the camp.
A: We reject that claim. The charge is being made for propaganda
purposes. It is aimed at creating a bad impression about the LTTE
in the minds of the Muslims.
Why hasn't
the LTTE accepted the SLMM ruling that the camp was a violation
of the ceasefire agreement ?
A: We have not violated the agreement. The issue has been mishandled
by the SLMM. |