Of
the people, by the people, for the people
By Random Access Memory (RAM)
'Globalisation and Sustainable Development' is the theme of a conference,
sponsored by the World Economic Forum which is to be held in Zurich,
Switzerland this weekend. Among the topics for discussion at the
conference are, 'Impact of globalisation on biodiversity, climate
and water' and 'Can financial markets encourage sustainable development?'
A key theme
of the World Economic Forum in Davos held earlier this year was
'Searching for a human face for capitalism'. Appearing in a recent
BBC 'Hard Talk' session, economist and former Bank of England Monitory
Policy Committee member Dr. Anne Julius claimed that 'Capitalism
is clearly the best system for wealth creation, if not for wealth
distribution'.
At a time when
Sri Lanka's policy makers and their advisors are all embracing the
direct route to generating wealth through an open sesame type domain,
the call is to take a hard look at the global debate on globalisation
and sustainability, pause for a little breather, look around and
take stock.
The need to
move fast to tackle the problem of unemployment, rising costs of
living, bridging the budget deficit and cementing the peace dividend
is all understood and appreciated. But is linking directly to the
global economy, pulling almost all the plugs in our systems, the
only way forward we have in meeting our development needs? The justification
given to us by our leaders, in pulling the plugs is that our resources
have thus far remained 'unutilised' or 'under-utilised'.
An infusion
of external capital investment, they claim can generate much needed
wealth and employment to bring us all prosperity. This is a very
noble and praiseworthy cause indeed. The flaw however, is in the
exploration and evaluation of the phenomena of 'unutilised' or 'under-utilised'
in some key areas. It is certainly true that there is much to be
done in the areas of mismanagement, corruption and wasteful use
of resources in Sri Lanka, but that failing should not be equated
to the way mother nature has herself utilised the endowments bestowed
on us.
The basic questions
we need to address are, if the natural environments of Sri Lanka
such as the wetlands, lagoons and marshes that are among the richest
in the globe in terms of their bio-diversity, have thus far been
unutilised? Have the natural habitats that supported and sustained
our rural folk for generations for their livelihood, remained unutilised?
Have the virgin forests and upland plains, which have given us the
very essence of our lives in springing water, been unutilised over
generations?
The global
deals that provide access to our natural resources come in several
forms. The most significant among them are the removal of restrictions
on ownership of property and land by non Sri Lankans and allowing
access to resources in areas with rich bio-diversity, in return
for writing off parts of our debt burden to the developed world.
A look at websites
on the Internet for real estate sales of natural habitats that are
'private lands' in areas such as Rekawa, Kalematiya, Nonagama in
the deep South, in the central hills and Dutch style houses within
the world heritage site of the Galle Fort are but some examples
of the fast paced land grabs that are going on.
The frenzied
pace at which the deals on the natural resources are taking place,
and the low performance systems on the ground for managing what
can be done with them is what is scary and of concern. It is true
that we in Sri Lanka have management and legal systems modelled
after the best in the world to 'care' for our environment, such
as Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs), provisions for imposing
controls under Coast Conservation, Wild Life Protection and Watershed
Management Acts. However, the failing occurs on the ground, when
the systems yield to the needs of vested interests and short sighted
schemes of those who hold power.
What we must
remember is that all is done to provide a better life for our people
and in the context of globalisation, the people of the world. Short-term
schemes that result in long term negative impacts must be carefully
considered and studied without hastily rushing into action.
What seems profitable
in the short term may be so, because thinking of the long term has
been set-aside in the back burners. Like the native American Chief
Seattle in 1852 said, 'How can you buy or sell the sky or the warmth
of the Land'. In Sri Lanka what is urged of our leaders is to establish
a caring and sustainable system to create and distribute wealth
that focus on the very core of democracy that all this is 'Of the
people, by the people, for the people'. |