True
captains do not come dime a dozen
By S.R. Pathiravithana
True captains do not come dime a dozen. They are a rare breed, but,
when they adorn, they leave an indelible mark in the annals of the
given sport. This story is about three true captains who hailed
from three different cities and helped their respective countries
and the sub-continet that they live change their cricketing image
forever.
They are three
individuals by the names of Kapildev Ramlal Niakhanj who hails from
the city of Chandigarh, India, Imran Khan Niazi from Lahore, Pakistan
and Arjuna Ranatunge from Gampaha, Sri Lanka. These three individuals
have many things in common but, most significant of them is they
led their respective countries to win the coveted World Cup while
some of the 'giants' in the arena are still drawing up strategies
of how to do so.
Kapildev led
the Indians to their win beating the then giants West Indies depriving
them of their third consecutive win in 1983. In 1992 Imran Khan
led his side to victory over England to win the cup, while Arjuna
Ranatunge's side redesigned the batting strategies in one-day cricket
and beat Australia who belittled them by refusing to play in the
island in the preliminary stage in 1996.
Another common
factor between these three individuals are, that they possess very
strong individual characters which some times even went beyond the
established norms set by the system. Some liked their styles and
some hated them.
Not that they were always right, but the fact remains that they
played having a certain agenda and the end result was that they
moulded three sets of world beaters who delivered the World Cup
to their respective countries.
In 1983 India
started the tournament taking it by storm when they beat the defending
champions West Indies by 34 runs and then half way through the tournament
they were stuck by the debutant Zimbabweans and were struggling
at 17 for 5. Then the true Indian grit came out in their skipper
Kapildev who made a memorable knock of 175 not out with six sixes
and sixteen fours and his team never looked back till they brought
home the trophy, thus becoming only the second team to do so besides
the West Indies.
With regard
to Pakistan's win the Wisden said " Pakistan were the worthy
winners. They started the tournament slowly, but improved constantly,
and under the superb leadership of Imran Khan they played as a team
- Something that the Pakistan sides have not always done. "
This statement sums up of what influence Imran had over his team.
Sri Lanka who
gained Test status in 1982, came under the leadership of Arjuna
Ranatunge in 1989-90 series against Australia. In the first five
years he moulded the side into a regular combination, but, the true
spirit of the Lankan team came after the ' boxing day ' issue in
Australia where Darryl Hair called spinner Muralitharan and the
whole country stood up in unison.
This reached
a crescendo when Australia refused to play their preliminary matches
in the island. The result was that Sri Lanka became the first host
country to win the World Cup. Arjuna Ranatunge led the side by example.
His innings
along with Aravinda de Silva in the final will be remembered by
all Sri Lankans who were fortunate enough to watch it on their TV
screens. Christopher Martin -Jenkins wrote in the Electronic Telegraph
" The image will long remain one of the most romantic in the
continuously evolving history of cricket. Half past ten on a misty
night in Lahore (The birth town of Imran Khan ) as the rain began
to fall, Arjuna Ranatunge, a tubby little 32-year-old in dark blue
shirt and trousers, holds up a huge silver trophy: a monument to
a little nation's marvellous sporting achievement".
Still the fact remains that Arjuna has been Sri Lanka's best cricket
captain ever produced.
This exercise
above goes to prove that a true captain is in charge of a team.
Generally it is not divided. When leadership is divided at times
loyalties within may start wavering. If that happens, even if the
two incumbent captains of a team ( one for one-day and the other
for Test cricket ) are on very good terms, cracks are bound appear
and it may be too late for remedial action.
Another stubborn
factor is that when the system appoints two captains one tends to
feel that the system has undermined the abilities of the other.
Even if they are a bit difficult to handle the system must go for
a captain who has true leadership qualities is bound to bring the
team under one banner and play as one-unit. |