Points to ponder
The incumbent Secretary-General
Don McKinnon no doubt defeated a late challenge for his job from
Sri Lanka's former foreign minister's adventurous candidature at
the on-going Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), but
the fact that 11 nations voted against him - one fifth of the total
membership - must cause concern.
Only Nigerian
host Olusegun Obasanjo will know who voted against him, but it is
an open secret that several African countries simply detest him.
Taken another way, it is a vote of no-confidence on his stewardship
by the Afro-Asian segment of the grouping of the former British
Empire, a matter Mr. McKinnon will need to consider very seriously
on his continuing to hold the post. The Commonwealth has survived
worste times, but once again there is this nagging irritant of the
Whites vs. the Blacks, and clearly, Africa sees the British-led
crusade against Zimbabwe and its President Robert Mugabe as an exercise
in personal vendetta coated in political morality.
Not that some
of these Commonwealth countries, Sri Lanka included, always play
by Queensbury rules. Take for instance, the issue of Britain picking
on one of the Commonwealth's oldest members - Sri Lanka - to finger-print
its citizens applying for visas to that country.
It seems it
is some countries that set the agenda for these summits. Good governance
and democracy is the theme for these summits, but the guidelines
are those standards of the old colonial masters. If Freedom of Movement
is a solemn guarantee under the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights to which all Commonwealth countries are signatories,
why is the issue of unhindered travel between at least Commonwealth
countries not an issue at these summits. Why is such degrading,
virtually criminal treatment meted out to consular sections of some
Commonwealth countries towards citizens of another Commonwealth
country not an issue?
Pakistan remains
expelled from the Commonwealth after President Musharraf's military
take-over, but some member-states, including Britain, Australia,
New Zealand and Canada did business with him when they waged war
in Afghanistan.
International
relations no doubt are full of double-standards, and the Commonwealth
is not immune to such hypocrisy, but there is no doubt good side
of the same coin as well.
The Commonwealth has indeed set some overall benchmark for democracy
and good governance which set some parameters for despot rulers,
but when some heads of government begin to interpret good governance
as if it is their God given right while blissfully ignoring some
of the rules they themselves break - that is what gets one's goat
up. The African states resent this the most, and Asia, including
Sri Lanka must take a more pro-active stand at these international
summits than just drift with the trend, set by some. |