Coping with a cacophony of opposites
In retrospect, it is ironic that in the eighties, despite the barbarities
committed by government forces during that time in Sri Lanka, one
could still own to a measure of optimism regarding the future of
this country. The differences then, as compared to now, are not
that difficult to pinpoint. We had a strongly activist civil society,
a vibrant media and most importantly, faith in at least one institution,
the judiciary. Thus, despite the killings and the widespread climate
of fear that prevailed, we could shoulder the burdens cast upon
us with a commendable degree of strength.
That
strength has however, progressively diminished through the years
with the insidious infiltration of despair into almost every aspect
of our functioning under non-emergency rule. We demonstrate such
a cacophony of opposites in our daily functioning that one is hard
pressed to isolate a single instance that is different from the
dissonant whole.
Thus,
we have peculiar happenings that are now accepted as the norm. In
one instance, for example, such is the profound mistrust of the
police, that a mother, whose son dies in police custody, buries
him in the home garden (see the case of Garlin Kankanamge Sanjeewa
which was cited in an urgent appeal by the Asian Human Rights Commission
(AHRC) (UA-41-2003).
This
was also reported by the Associated Press recently under the heading
"Fearing police may steal the body [of] her alleged torture
victim son, mother buries body in garden," 1 September 2003).
Sanjeewa had allegedly been tortured by officers attached to the
Kadawata Police Station who, in turn, claimed that he had committed
suicide inside the police station. His mother buried him in her
garden plot because she feared that the police might interfere with
his body if he had been buried elsewhere, thus preventing the holding
of an impartial post mortem.
Then
again, perhaps, this is a proceeding that many mothers in Sri Lanka
might have to resort to as a matter of absolute necessity, if recent
news reports regarding the utter neglect of mortuaries in our key
hospitals are anything to go bye. One example in this regard is
the Anuradhapura Hospital, which reportedly has no functioning freezer
units, leading to repugnant practices such as placing two bodies
in one drawer and keeping unidentified bodies, (as well as bodies
awaiting court orders for post mortems), in polythene bags outside
the morgue. Meanwhile, the bodies that are left outside become,
not surprisingly, decomposed and infested with maggots with flies
swarming over them, thus posing a threat to patients at the hospital.
All post mortems have been suspended at the hospital.
These
are twin examples of something desperately wrong in our society
and in our basic rule of law structures, despite the Commissions
and Committees that we have in existence. These questions only reflect
our dysfunction at the highest levels. While a leap from morgues
to other more sophisticated entities and happenings does not require
that amount of mental agility given the equal degree of putrefaction
that prevails, civil rights activists in other countries marvel
as to how easily corruptible our institutional structures have become.
The
insidious co-opting of civil society as well as vast segments of
the media, into the political structures of the two major political
parties in this country and the equally insidious linking of the
executive with the judiciary, overtly as well as covertly in recent
years, are all faces of this same coin.
Thus,
one cannot be surprised at the most recent manifestations of this
phenomenon, such as secret swearing in ceremonies of the executive
President of this country or the utter contempt now demonstrated
for the courts as evidenced by killings in the precincts of courthouses
being elevated to a new level, as it were, by the gunning down of
an 'underworld kingpin' while court proceedings were in session
last week. By that same token, one cannot be surprised at the largely
passive and/or politicised reactions that have come about as a response
to these incidents.
This
same dysfunction rules in the upsurge of religio-nationalist sentiment
in recent months. That the groundwork for this upsurge had been
carefully - and callously - prepared long before by particular individuals
at the highest levels of authority in Sri Lanka, is now increasingly
knowledge within the public domain. What we should do with this
knowledge, is as yet, an unanswered question. Yet again, we appear
to be wholly incapable of defying our personal and collective insecurities
and egocentricities in dealing with these issues.
Then
again, we are poised to hold, at the very minimum, Provincial Council
elections this year where some one hundred and thirty new members,
(including those of the North-East Provincial Council), are expected
to enter the Councils due to representation mandated for an increased
population in the provinces. The Parliamentary Select Committee
on Electoral Reforms avowedly plans on amending the Provincial Councils
Elections Law to prevent this unnecessary increase in the numbers
of provincial representation with the consequent burden on the public
coffers.
While
there appears to be some measure of consensus on this between the
major political parties, the other matter on which there is also
some agreement is that elections should be held on the same day.
The interim report of the Select Committee, due to be released end
this month, may or may not identify new issues on which political
consensus has been reached on what manner of electoral system suits
this country.
However,
what we really need are not changes in the systems so much as the
taking of basic steps to safeguard the rights of voters in this
country, whichever system is in force. Primarily, this would include
the immediate appointment of the Elections Commission, amendment
of the 17th Amendment in order that the Commission is given greater
enforcement powers in its conducting of the franchise and amendment
of election laws in order to prevent election malpractice more effectively.
Without these changes, the holding of elections in whatever manner
this year will only be a repeat of the miseries that we had to undergo
in the past.
While
the blame for many recent institutional failures could be directed
fairly and squarely at the Peoples Alliance Presidency, the United
National Front government has, in turn, been singularly inept in
its handling of rule of law imperatives during its two years in
office. Its blindingly blinkered approach in focusing on the North-East
to the exclusion of everything else, has been predictably counter
productive as has its toleration of corruption and worse within
its ranks. We are now facing the consequences of this shortsightedness
in no small measure. |