"Mischief,
thou art afoot!"
By CNS
The present political chaos or the "constitutional
crisis" is too complex for us "poor mortals" to understand.
The current confusion and all its complexities, its fury and mire,
are not at all easy to grasp and make sense of purely with a careful
reading of explanations at press conferences, in communiqués
and TV discourses or of interpretations in political commentaries
and newspaper editorials. Statements or letters from the international
community -Richard Armitage, Colin Powell, et al.- are not helpful,
either. The contemporary Sri Lankan "crisis" defies analysis
because it does not fall within "the parameters" (whatever
that means) of any political theory or moral ethic.
Then,
where shall we look? Look for a "paradigm shift" (whatever
that too means) through a four-hundred-year-old four-word sentence:
"Mischief, thou art afoot." These are portentous words
that William Shakespeare put into the mouth of Mark Antony in Julius
Caesar, a play full of conspiracy and potential revolution.
In
early November last year three key cabinet portfolios were wrested
from the grasp of the Prime Minister, who was abroad meeting the
President of the world's super power. That was not as bad as in
some African countries where the head of state, when he was abroad
attending a meeting of the Organization of African Unity (OAU),
returned home only to find that he had been removed from power in
a coup.
Mark
Antony's words may have found resonance in our country: "Now
let it work. Mischief, thou art afoot. Take thou what course thou
wilt." These are words Antony spoke in soliloquy, after his
funeral oration over the dead body of Julius Caesar. The citizens
had left with the body. Soliloquies in Shakespeare's plays lay bare
the heart of the speaker, his innermost thoughts, his mind. These
words reflect the harsh political realities of our time.
The
course that the "most unkindest cut of all" after two
years of hope and warlessness is taking may be "bound in shallows
and in miseries". The henduwa (goad) has gone, leaving the
mahout bereft. This is one way to look at the situation; another
way, we are told, is that the henduwa, the portfolio of Defence,
is not an indispensable tool for peace talks or economic growth
or stability or investor confidence. The pot of rice that was on
the fire has been smashed, the Prime Minister says. And, those who
did not support the peace initiative are, ironically, now restless
that it has been stalled. Ambivalence and dissension are rife. On
the one hand, there is talk of "regaining Sri Lanka";
on the other, "resurrecting Sri Lanka". The crux of the
matter is that "mischief is afoot".
Mischief,
among all other similar concepts, is the one that seems to best
describe our predicament, for as Octavius tells Antony: "And
some that smile have in their hearts, I fear/ Millions of mischiefs".
"Mischiefs", which we learnt in school was an uncountable
noun, in Shakespearian language simply means "harmful thoughts".
The smile incidentally was also a word in Hamlet, where "Oh
villain, villain, smiling damned villain!…That one may smile,
and smile and be a villain", casts doubts on what lies beneath
a smile. Could it be "some sick offence within (the) mind"?
It
is not only the political scene that smacks of "mischief".
There is "mischief" everywhere: in five star hotels and
nightclubs, and above all, in courts of law, where "dark poetic
justice" is meted out to criminals brought to justice; "
in divisional secretariats, where divisional secretaries are assaulted
by MPs, and as a result hospitalized; in churches, which are stoned
and bombed and destroyed and also in temples, where incumbent priests
are grievously assaulted by Pradeshiya Sabha members; in five-star
hotels and discotheques where the sons of the powerful cause "grievous
hurt" to relatives of other powerful people. "Murder most
foul" is everywhere as the crime rate rises.
The
guarded whispers heard in nooks and corners, drawing rooms and lobbies,
street corners and bus halts also smack of mischief of the type
hatched by the conspirators in Julius Caesar. Mischief is truly
afoot.
Shakespeare
is intimately relevant to the Sri Lankan scene. In fact, it has
always been, for Shakespeare is timeless. Our leaders, "proud
men, dressed in a little brief authority" since and before
independence from British rule are replicas of Shakespearian kings;
their followers are replicas of the Roman mob, swayed by demagogy
and roused by rhetoric.
The
Roman mob is right here in Colombo and everywhere -waving flags,
shouting slogans, pasting posters, threatening to commit suicide
through hunger strikes, organizing mayhem and promoting chaos, waving
our red weapons o'er our heads. "Cry Havoc and let slip the
dogs of war."
What
of the vast throngs that lined the route from the Airport to Colombo
and "pressed upon him" during the Prime Minister's nine-hour
journey to "Temple Trees"? That is another kind of Roman
mob. What of the devotees clad in white that lined the streets bedecked
with saffron flags and queued for hours to pay their last respects
to Soma Hamuduruwo?
That
is another kind of Roman mob. What of the crowds that listen to
the insurrectionists of yesteryear at their well-orchestrated public
rallies? What of the crowds that stand spell-bound by the hate for
the Prime Minister that an erstwhile insurgent's rabble-rousing
orations ooze with, resembling the blustering defiant anger of Cassius?
That is another kind of Roman mob. Think of all the people who walked
from Galle to Colombo and from Kandy to Colombo to "save the
motherland". That also is a mob. Mobs are not in short supply
in our land.
For
a while, the Prime Minister flitting from one capital to another,
building a safety net out of the international community, looked
as if "he doth bestride the narrow world Like a Colossus"
and "grown so great". Cassius's question to Brutus: "Why
should that name be sounded more than yours?" may have been
asked about the Prime Minister by "petty men", "underlings",
whose "fault is not in (their) stars but in (themselves)".
Have all the triumphs at the international level - support and good
will, mega dollars of aid and solidarity from friends "to grapple
to the soul with hoops of steel" -"shrunk to this little
measure"?
Disrespect
for the Roman Senate is reflected in the current disdain for our
Parliament and the will of the people. "The will, the will",
which the Roman populace wanted revealed is like the secret oath
taken without an iota of regard for the people's right to know what's
happening at the highest levels of government. The nation waited
for several weeks to know the truth since award-winning young journalist
Ranjit Ananda Jayasinghe in a Sunday Times front page headline told
the country of a secret swearing-in ceremony. Those weeks were like
the several minutes of waiting during and after Antony's oration
before the mob was told about the will of Julius Caesar. "The
abuse of greatness is, when it disjoins Remorse from power."
Amid
the feigned friendship with those who murdered her husband, isn't
there a widow among us who would soliloquize: "O pardon me,
thou bleeding piece of earth, That I am meek and gentle with these
butchers?" while an elaborate handshaking ("Shaking the
bloody fingers of thy foes") takes place in a majestic memorial
hall built in memory of a great father? Isn't there a Cassius somewhere
with "a lean and hungry look" and "dangerous"
who is asking," What compact mean you to have with us?"
And, we heard on TV a former insurrectionist describe the onus of
the "historic alliance" of January 20, 2004 as a "poojaneeya
karthavya" (hallowed and sacred task) -" a dish fit for
the gods".
The
words of a soldier Marcellus (in Hamlet) - "Something is rotten
in the state of Denmark"- must truly be true of Sri Lanka,
where "judgement has fled to brutish beasts, And men have lost
their reason." A citizen says in response to Mark Antony's
oration, "I fear there will be a worse come in his place."
This is a proverbial expression meaning that all change is for the
worse. |