Rummaging
for 'resources'
The usual trek has begun. Politicians - the seasoned ones and the
newly inducted babes - of all hues - going in search of financier-cows
to milk and fund their respective campaigns for the forthcoming
General Election.
A
third parliamentary election in four years - a Presidential election
in 1999, numerous provincial and local elections in-between, and
these cows have had their udders milked dry.
From
whichever party, these campaigners must have what they call in refined
terms "resources". Even then, these financiers must keep
the politicians in their ' good books', and for some of the richer
ones, to have all parties in their pockets is as good an insurance
as it gets. Nothing new to Sri Lankan politics.
This
week, immediately after the decision hatched in secrecy and incubated
in the darkness of the night of last Saturday to hold a snap poll
in April, the mad rush in search of these 'resources' has been the
order of the day - but mostly at night under the cover of darkness.
In sheer desperation, others have asked for Over-Draft facilities
from the bank.
Suitcases
of cash, fistful of cheques, and voluminous IOUs, both written and
unwritten, are being exchanged. Some of these IOUs only to be encashed
if and when the recipient wins a ministry and can hand out a government
tender to the financier. This is what elections are all about. This
is the ugly side of democracy and parliamentary politics -- all
part and parcel of the process to elect 225 citizens who will be
called Honourable Members of Parliament in due course.
Election
laws that govern expenses are unrealistic in the extreme. Imagine
the authorised expense for any party is calculated by the number
of votes received at 50 cents per voter. No more need be said on
that. Section 80 of the Parliamentary Elections Act details an entire
section on Bribery, punishing the giver and the taker with a jail
term. The Attorney General is expected to sanction such prosecutions.
Either
no effort is being made to prosecute such offenders, or we are supposed
to believe that no such corrupt practices take place. The biggest
bribe takers in the country are the main political parties, and
their leading lights. The small-time politicians fighting in this
neck in the woods is a small-time bribe-taker obliged only to the
village mudalali or kasippu-dealer.
Only
a handful escape the vicious circle, thanks mainly to having their
own 'resources' or some genuine friends, but that is almost like
finding a pie in the sky. The Proportional Representation system
where a candidate has two battles - one with the opposing party,
the other within his own ranks for the dreaded 'manape' (preferential
vote) only compounds matters.
The
JVP having long battled to avoid this back-stabbing business, has
now to succumb, having gone into an alliance with the SLFP and coming
on a common list. The JVP is alleged to be resorting to more brazen
tactics than insider trading. With strong trade union links, JVP
activists stand accused of raising funds by threatening businessmen
with strikes and claims of re-nationalization of privatized state
ventures.
They
must make a public statement on this accusation if they want to
regain the public's confidence on their democratic intentions. It
would seem, that the corrosive effect of electioneering continues
to take its toll, and despite all the balderdash about bribery and
corruption, few come unscathed without soiling their hands. |