| Leniency 
              for rule breakers More 
              than 10 percent of the companies listed on the Colombo Stock Exchange 
              (CSE) are on the default board mainly because they have broken the 
              listing requirements on non-submission of annual reports and quarterly 
              financial statements. This is a startling figure and one that is 
              certainly not encouraging for members of the investing public thinking 
              of spending their money to buy shares on the bourse. The CSE now 
              has 242 listed companies of which 31 have been transferred to the 
              default board.
  Some 
              of the companies have been there for up to three years. The default 
              board list includes some well-known firms such as old, established 
              ones, holding companies, firms headed by leading corporate personalities, 
              and newer ones that have grown rapidly.
  This 
              surely indicates a lack of concern for abiding by CSE listing rules 
              and disregard for the views of shareholders and investors. It also 
              shows the irresponsible attitude of the managements of these companies.
  At 
              least two firms have been transferred to the default board for non-payment 
              of listing fees last year. If listed companies can't meet one of 
              the most basic of listing rules such as filing their accounts on 
              time, how can investors be sure that they will pay dividends on 
              time or comply with other rules?
  All 
              the firms listed on the CSE have a market capitalisation of over 
              Rs 145 billion or about eight percent of the country's GDP. Despite 
              the best efforts of the CSE the number of companies listed on the 
              exchange has not grown significantly over the last few years. Nor 
              have its efforts to attract firms in new sectors such as garments 
              had much success. This is certainly not owing to any lack of effort 
              on the part of the CSE but probably more because of the country's 
              general economic climate, the lack of desire to list on the part 
              of companies themselves, many of which are closely held by families 
              who don't want to give up control, and perhaps insufficient awareness 
              about the benefits of listing. Many firms are also reluctant to 
              list because of the need to disclose financial information.
  The 
              CSE appears to be rather lenient towards these companies that have 
              broken the rules. According to CSE rules, in addition to being on 
              the default board, the companies may be fined by the CSE Rs. 500 
              per day for delays in submission of half yearly reports and annual 
              provisional accounts. However, the CSE has never enforced this rule 
              and not a single firm on the default board has been fined so far. 
              Nor is there a specific time limit for the CSE to take action, such 
              as delisting, against companies that violate the rules on submission 
              of their accounts.
  The 
              CSE appears to be not taking action in the belief that imposing 
              fines on companies in such great difficulty that they have trouble 
              complying with CSE rules and filing regular financial statements 
              could put them in further difficulty. It also believes that de-listing 
              a company will put the shareholders in difficulty as there would 
              then be no way for them to dispose of their shares. The 
              regulators have been striving in recent years to make the stock 
              exchange listing and trading rules more liberal, reduce the fees 
              and costs for market participants, and improve the reliability and 
              efficiency of transactions. All these measures were aimed at making 
              the CSE more attractive and to improve its performance. 
  The 
              least the regulators can do in such circumstances is to penalise 
              those who break the rules. By not doing so they are setting a bad 
              example. The managements of those firms on the default board are 
              also setting a bad example. This is all the more discouraging given 
              the fact that there is no shortage of rhetoric about corporate good 
              governance and improving accountability in listed companies. |