Marriage
during our time
By C. N. S.
There was a time when sex life
began with married life. That time seems to be over, now sex seems
to end with marriage. Unmarried young people are having more and
more of sex, and middle-aged married couples are having less of
it. Britain's celebrated sex therapist and psychiatrist Dr. Colin
Wilson made this observation about the sexual revolution that has
put marriage in a topsy-turvy state. "Marriage was once about
getting sex; now, it's about giving it up," says Dr. Wilson.
This revolution has not left even our part of the world untouched.
A
case in point is that of the parents who sent their son for tertiary
studies abroad. During a university vacation, he returned home on
holiday with a pretty young woman from the foreign country.
They
spent a happy holiday in the home of his parents-a conservative
couple with roots in a distant rural culture, but now resident in
Colombo and of liberal outlook. The young couple went back to their
studies in the foreign country and in due course, news arrived that
the son was now a father. The baby grew up and a couple of years
later, they had their wedding in the foreign land, which the parents
of both parties attended.
Test
drives
This simple story of wedlock after, not before, the birth
of a child and accepted and blessed by kith and kin of both husband
and wife may not be an earth-shaking story today. It does tell us
something about how we love now. Parenthood outside wedlock and
then marriage is a sequence of events that seems topsy-turvy, out
of joint, or udayatikuru, as we say in pithy Sinhala.Reassuring
FPA advertisements of emergency contraceptive pills to be used the
morning after are confidence-building aids for young people, who
are now engaged in re-engineering the institution of marriage and
family.
It
all makes short shrift of our schoolboy theory of yore about the
reason for morality: lack of opportunity and fear of consequence.
Now there is no lack and no fear. The advent of the ‘pill’
liberalised sex and heralded the sexual revolution.
‘Cohabitation’
has come to stay between man and woman, though, unfortunately, it
did not between our President and our Prime Minister. Anyway, ‘constitutional
cohabitation’ has been described by a leading constitutional
lawyer as "a political masquerade!"
According
to veteran journalist S. Pathiravithane, "to say that either
a man or a woman have been cohabiting suggests immediately that
the two together have been doing something illegal or immoral."
A quasi wife without having to commit is what cohabitation at the
man-woman level provides," says David Popenoe of the Rutgers
University National Marriage Project in New Jersey. Opportunities
are open and consequences are of no matter in the matter of living
together as husband and wife without being married, which is what
cohabitations means.
To
have and to hold
More and more couples are choosing to live together before
wedlock. Sex is now easily available whereas it was in those days
available after marriage. The result is that sex, which in those
days led to the consummation and culmination of marriage, is now
a different kettle of fish. George W. Bush, known as a family man,
is planning a marriage drive this election year at a huge cost of
federal funds. Advertising campaigns will promote the value of marriage.
Training will be provided for couples to survive rocky patches in
marriage.
Britney
Spears, who shot to super stardom as a teenager with her debut album
Baby, one more time, had her marriage to Jason Alexander annulled
within two days. She told the judge that she and her new husband
were incompatible. They did not know each other's likes and dislikes,
and each other's desires to have or not have children and each other's
desires as to state of residency. They were lawfully restored to
the status of single, unmarried persons. Marriage is cheap, divorce
cheaper. The Christian marriage vow "to have and to hold, for
better or for worse, in sickness and in health… till death
do us part" is being made a mockery of. |