The
first 90 days of the JVP's parliamentary revolution
By Our Political Editor
A war of wits, and a jumping majority?
In 2004, those are some of the amazing unfolding catchphrases relating
to basic governance. A 'jumping majority' does not indicate crossovers
though it might come to that. It signifies a government which gets
a majority from issue to issue -- meaning that it might lose some
of the votes in Parliament but may still tide over the key votes
thus being able to run an effective administration.
The
following is a paragraph from a political science textbook published
in the UK:"Although Britain has only two major political parties
at present (Labour and Conservative), there are several others with
enough support (Liberal, for instance at around 10%) to have some
members in the Commons. It is possible for a party to govern without
holding a majority of the seats by themselves, so long as they can
attract enough support from other party members to win a majority
on key votes. If not, a new general election is held.''
As
is seen by that quote, the 'key votes' are the issue here. But,
in the Sri Lankan Parliament to convene on the 22nd, there is an
added element that is being promised. Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar
and a dozen other UPFA frontliners have announced the Parliament
will convene as a constituent assembly also from the 22nd of this
month. (Thursday.) Like the dominoes, the support or the expected
support for this move is collapsing almost by the minute, but its
backers are holding on with splendid stubbornness.
The
JHU has now indicated that they are also against this move, and
to this you can add the babel of voices coming from the UNF the
CWC the SLMC and of course from civil society and a considerable
swathe of opinion from the legal fraternity.
At
a seminar held just before the elections on this issue, Professor
Carlo Fonseka argued that a 50 per cent of the popular vote should
be sufficient for this move, as this is what J. R. Jayewardene obtained
to change the Constitution in 1977. Fonseka attributed the fact
that the late JRJ had a two thirds majority, to a "constitutional
artefact owing to the first past the post system.''
But
this government falls short even of the Professor's yardstick. It
does not have 50 per cent of the popular vote. It has no grasp of
the grundnorm, no way the vital 'vox populi.' But yet, this government
is determined to go ahead with this constituent assembly on the
premise that it has a "mandate'' from the people to change
the constitution via such an arrangement.
But
legal revolution aside, the JVP is making vast strides in its own
revolution, a silent revolution in which it seems to have already
usurped the power of the traditional Sri Lankan power elite. At
the time of writing, it appears the standoff continues on re-allocation
of various vitals of certain Ministries which were given to the
JVP. The JVP wants Mahaweli restored to the Ministry of Agriculture,
and the Film Corporation restored to the Ministry of Culture for
example.
The
JVP's long term plan for taking over the entire administrative structure
of the country -- perhaps at a future election - - is obvious from
the fact that the party has asked for Cabinet portfolios that can
enlarge its populist support base without getting into the knitty-gritty
aspects of structural governance. One political analyst put it rather
unkindly however to say "the JVP will make the biggest fudge
- - and the bigger the fudge the bigger the noise.'' With agriculture
and culture in the basket, the JVP will enlarge its rural and peasant
support base - - and perhaps watch from the relaxing grassy knolls
of populism while its partner the SLFP gets stuck in the deep mire
of peacemaking and international trade. With this support base assured
at a later date, the JVP seeks to pounce at the correct time, and
the rest will be a sad story for the SLFP.
The
SLFP seeks to get wiser to this game plan. This week the President
particularly was getting ready to inject the party with a world-view,
a solid ideological base to replace a traditional party's longstanding
fondness for expedient politics. The game plan is to match the JVP
for honesty and clean politics, if not to better the JVP in efficiency
and public spiritedness. To this end the President met her parliamentary
group yesterday in Kandy.
She
has already unveiled a strict Code of Ethics for her parliamentary
group and this document was personally approved by her at the weeks-end.
The Code of Ethics says for instance that on average every Minister
travelled 12 to 15 times abroad in the last two years. In contrast
she stipulates that all foreign trips be sanctioned by her in this
current administration. All transfers likewise would be sanctioned
by her, and there should be no immediate relatives appointed to
posts in Ministries of the UPFA Cabinet.
She
wants to be seen as the greater paragon of virtue than the JVP,
now that the JVP has already beaten her to the race in virtuous
and squeaky clean politics. You can say she will go out of the way
in this regard. Former UNF Minister Karunasena Kodituwakku for instance,
had written to the President's office requesting her permission
to participate in a UNESCO governing board meeting.
The
President's Secretary being the preppy ex-public servant that he
is, said that Minister Koddituwakku is not even a MP, and was about
to write a letter for the President's signature politely turning
down the request, when the President intervened to say that Kodituwakku
should go for the conference. Accordingly the former UNF Minister,
now unseated, emplaned and had by the time of this writing already
left for the meeting, thanks to the magnanimous sanction of the
President.
So,
as it turns out, the JVP has a world-view and a plan of action,
the President has a worldview and a plan of action (however reactive
it maybe to the JVPs more pro-active plan) but does the UNP one
of the country's oldest political parties have a plan of action
a worldview or a political philosophy in the face of its defeat?
The
party has announced a grand restructuring program, and many heads
will roll they say. Some heads have already rolled, such as Tyronne
Fernando for instance. But, before the re-structuring, the UNP positions
itself as the pragmatic party which did not make sweeping ideological
claims -- or sweeping promises. So, the UNP has set a ninety day
delivery deadline for the JVP and the UPFA's masters of political
rhetoric. The game plan is to say to the JVP: "work as well
as you can talk."
To
this end the UNF shows the impossibilities inherent in the so-called
"promissory politics'' of the UPFA. The breakdown is shown
as this way: a 75 per cent salary increase of government employees
requires 90 billion Rupees. The promised wheat subsidy requires
Rs 3000 million year. The promised new fertilizer subsidy will cost
Rs. 750 million per year. The promised sugar subsidy will cost 2400
million rupees per year. Most importantly the promise of 60000 jobs
in 3 months will mean the creation of 1600 jobs a day at a cost
of 6 billion Rupees to the Treasury (that's excluding the promise
that all graduates will get a salary of Rs 30000 per month.)
Can
the UPFA deliver all of this in 90 days within the constraints of
the budget? If it does not happen -- the UNP is sure it won't --
the government is given a life span of 100 to 150 days by the UNP's
spanking new opposition. Can the new power elite, notably the JVP,
deliver?
JVP
says SLFP inconsistent on policy
By Harinda Ranura Vidanage
The week started off with a major stand off between the UPFA stakeholders
with the JVP boycotting the official swearing in of the new Ministers.
The JVP in its strongest political protest action since the alliance
was formed hit out at the stripping of certain subjects in the ministries
allocated to them and reassigning them to some senior SLFP members
also in the Cabinet. The SLFP leadership made this decision at the
last moment making the JVP realize that it was extremely difficult
to be consistent in policy matters with its new alliance partner.
In
this latest crisis it is clearly the SLFP that has to be blamed
for having suddenly jumped off track from a previously agreed position.
Mutual trust is really essential for a political alliance to function
smoothly and to ensure its survival in a harsh political climate
as is available in Sri Lanka where any mistake may prove to be costly.
Though
President Kumaratunga still seemed shocked by the JVP's boycott
she appeared to be more angered by the hostile departure of a dejected
Arjuna Ranatunga at reportedly not being offered the ministry of
sports. After the swearing in, President Kumaratunga addressed her
new ministers. This was no pep talk. She said what a difficult position
she was in and even threatened to resign. But Anura Bandaranaike
who saw the lighter side of this comment said "when I was small
I always heard my mother saying quite a few times that she will
resign as Prime Minister but never ever actually did so", President
Kumaratunga sternly responded to this remark saying "Anura
I am not your mother".
She
forthwith appointed a committee to iron out matters with the JVP
realizing that she was in a disadvantageous position unless she
gets the alliance back on track. Failing to do this could have been
critical for the UPFA to proceed to run the government. It was Prime
Minister Mahinda Rajapakse who took the initiative to patch up the
two parties. He tried to establish a link between the JVP and the
committee through his special envoy Dr. Ajith Ranawaka. But these
moves were short lived as Mr. Bandaranaike intervened to suggest
that it would be better if the Prime Minister opted out of this
process.
Mr.
Bandaranaike's comment did discourage the Prime Ministerial initiative.
To the surprise of many in the SLFP a member of the committee pursued
the effort. It was none other than Douglas Devananda who arranged
a few meetings with the JVP delegations to settle the matter. Even
Ven Elle Gunawansa Thera of the Patriotic National Front an offshoot
national movement of the JVP contributed towards these peace making
efforts. They all desired the new Alliance to go ahead with governing.
Everyone feared such internal crises may jeopardise their efforts
of the last one-year.
The
JVP though agreeing to compromise were very clear on their stand.
They wanted the subjects of Mahaweli and Livestock back. The JVP
message was clear. "We believe in working according to a certain
policy, we do not indulge in politics of pleasing individuals. The
SLFP always looked at pleasing, for example they had to give away
the Prime Ministers post to Mahinda Rajapakse instead of to Lakshman
Kadirgamar as planned, now its Maithripala Sirisena."
The
JVP position is quite commendable for Sri Lankan politics need some
sound policy adherence to progress further. Also the JVP method
of scientific distribution of ministries is pragmatic in jumpstarting
efficient and effective ministerial operations. But the JVP has
now a huge task ahead to develop and deliver the relief packages
and welfare oriented solutions to the people as the Sri Lankan public
could easily be motivated to vote on promises. Such statements could
also contribute to the downfall of many politicians and parties.
Laterally in this love hate relationship with the politicians the
voter shows little mercy. The downfall of the strong UNF regime
within two years is a glaring example of this phenomenon at work.
The
SLFP quite desperate to settle the crisis between the two parties
going out of control offered an extra deputy ministerial position
to the JVP on Thursday at a meeting in Presidents House. The post
offered was as deputy to Maithripala Sirisena but the JVP rejected
the offer saying that they do not want anything other than what
they have agreed to in their power sharing agreement. The Reds also
came down a step in the ladder by offering to forego the ministry
of Lands as a compromise. After all these manoeuvers the ultimate
decision seemed to rest with President Kumaratunga.
The
SLFP has now conceived a new line of defence in the aftermath of
the general election scenario. Fearing that a possible disintegration
of the party was imminent the SLFP stalwarts have sprung up a safety
net to arrest further inroads being made into the party.
The
vanguard of this new movement comprise Maithripala Sirisena, Susil
Premjayantha and Nimal Siripala Silva. Many would be questioning
the logic of appointing a large number of cabinet ministers this
time when the President had a chance to bring down the number of
ministers and set up a model cabinet. But this came as a SLFP effort
to empower the whole SLFP unit within the government with executive
powers. Now JVP MPs will occupy the whole UPFA backbench. |