Indian
impact on Lanka
The resonance and the vibrations of the surprise and momentous election
victory of the Ms. Sonia Gandhi-led Congress Party in neighbouring
India will surely be felt in Sri Lanka in next to no time. Already,
Sri Lankan political leaders are packing their bags to out-fly the
other to pay homage at the feet of the new leaders of the world's
largest democracy. There is no indecent hurry, really.
The
entry of Ms. Gandhi will see a new phase in Indo-Lanka relations.
Though brother Mr. Anura Bandaranaike has already beaten her to
it, President Chandrika Kumaratunga no doubt will re-kindle the
flame of old family ties between the Gandhis and the Bandaranaikes
and the similarities of two widows with two children, whose young
husbands were assassinated by a Sri Lankan terror group should not
be lost in the correspondence.
There
is a greater need for Sri Lankan political leaders to recognise
that the new Indian Prime Minister will surely take a hardline on
the LTTE, especially for killing her husband. This has been acknowledged
to some extent by Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar's remarks
in Washington this week that he expects the new Indian Government
to press for the extradition of the elusive LTTE leader. At the
moment, however, President Kumaratunga is blatantly placating the
LTTE in a desperate bid to re-start peace talks and win international
support before the June 3 Brussels donor conference.
While
not having to pay 'pooja' to India, as Sri Lankan leaders have been
prone to do in recent years and weeks, there is equally a need to
ensure that Sri Lanka is not out-of-step with India's justifiable
concerns. A bi-partisan think-tank of India-watchers is a sine qua
non for Sri Lanka that has long relied on individual preferences,
family connections and knee-jerk reactions to relations with India.
Mr. Bandaranaike in his letter dashed off to the new Indian leader
talks of the great Gandhi-Bandaranaike ties. What use were these
ties if Mrs. Indira Gandhi unleashed this bloody north-east separatist
insurgency and her son Rajiv sent his Air Force to stop the Sri
Lankan army from defeating the LTTE at Vadamaratchchi in 1987 when
we may have seen an end to this brutish civil war.
The
vanquished Indian leader Atal Bihari Vajpayee has bowed out gracefully.
Almost a carbon-copy to what happened here last month, the ruling
party of India believed an unprecedented 7 per cent growth rate,
proliferation of mobile phones and sleek super highways would carry
them back to office on the shoulders of the cheering multitude.
BJP’s ' India Shining ' slogan like, UNF's ' Regaining Sri
Lanka , attracted only the urban economy, neglecting the rural folks.
The
lesson from both Sri Lanka and India is that the benefits of rapid
economic development must have a human face. Fashionable terms like
' fast-tracking' etc., were seen- definitely in Sri Lanka - as excuses
for a few rich kids to break the rules and become richer prostituting
the name of development.
To
expect to have India's BJP have their economic reforms impact on
the teeming millions of poverty-ridden Indians is more than a trifle
unfair. To have expected economic benefits to flow to the poor in
two years, in Sri Lanka, is more than unfair.
Both,
the BJP and the UNF adopted a pro-US stance to attract investment,
struck peace deals with Pakistan and the LTTE respectively,and if
there was a difference, it was in the area of world trade and subsidies
for agriculture, where the BJP broke ranks with the US, but where
the UNF slavishly followed the US.
And
yet, both these parties did raise the economies, placed as they
are, among the poorest of the poor in the comity of nations on Planet
Earth. Despite progressing instead of regressing, the rural poor
have humbled them. The obvious issue for the new governments though
would be how to retain or improve on the economic gains via growth
rates and keep the peace with the poor in a uni-polar pro-US world.
Clearly
recognising this fact, Sri Lanka sent her Foreign Minister to Washington
within the first month of assuming office, and in his words “to
remind them (the US) that we are there". And the US, as all
know, will not help without extracting its pound-of-flesh. But to
the masses of India, must go the credit for their maturity to reject
a virulent campaign against the Italian-born Ms. Gandhi. Even to
the great pretenders to the great democratic ideals like the US,
the remote possibility of electing a black President would be a
long way off.
And
who knows, whether this could be the beginning of a trend for democracies
around the world to elect, by popular vote, in time to come, a foreign
CEO/Head of Government to efficiently manage countries ruined by
its own sons and daughters of the soil. |