Indian 
              impact on Lanka 
              The resonance and the vibrations of the surprise and momentous election 
              victory of the Ms. Sonia Gandhi-led Congress Party in neighbouring 
              India will surely be felt in Sri Lanka in next to no time. Already, 
              Sri Lankan political leaders are packing their bags to out-fly the 
              other to pay homage at the feet of the new leaders of the world's 
              largest democracy. There is no indecent hurry, really. 
             The 
              entry of Ms. Gandhi will see a new phase in Indo-Lanka relations. 
              Though brother Mr. Anura Bandaranaike has already beaten her to 
              it, President Chandrika Kumaratunga no doubt will re-kindle the 
              flame of old family ties between the Gandhis and the Bandaranaikes 
              and the similarities of two widows with two children, whose young 
              husbands were assassinated by a Sri Lankan terror group should not 
              be lost in the correspondence. 
             There 
              is a greater need for Sri Lankan political leaders to recognise 
              that the new Indian Prime Minister will surely take a hardline on 
              the LTTE, especially for killing her husband. This has been acknowledged 
              to some extent by Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar's remarks 
              in Washington this week that he expects the new Indian Government 
              to press for the extradition of the elusive LTTE leader. At the 
              moment, however, President Kumaratunga is blatantly placating the 
              LTTE in a desperate bid to re-start peace talks and win international 
              support before the June 3 Brussels donor conference. 
             While 
              not having to pay 'pooja' to India, as Sri Lankan leaders have been 
              prone to do in recent years and weeks, there is equally a need to 
              ensure that Sri Lanka is not out-of-step with India's justifiable 
              concerns. A bi-partisan think-tank of India-watchers is a sine qua 
              non for Sri Lanka that has long relied on individual preferences, 
              family connections and knee-jerk reactions to relations with India. 
              Mr. Bandaranaike in his letter dashed off to the new Indian leader 
              talks of the great Gandhi-Bandaranaike ties. What use were these 
              ties if Mrs. Indira Gandhi unleashed this bloody north-east separatist 
              insurgency and her son Rajiv sent his Air Force to stop the Sri 
              Lankan army from defeating the LTTE at Vadamaratchchi in 1987 when 
              we may have seen an end to this brutish civil war. 
             The 
              vanquished Indian leader Atal Bihari Vajpayee has bowed out gracefully. 
              Almost a carbon-copy to what happened here last month, the ruling 
              party of India believed an unprecedented 7 per cent growth rate, 
              proliferation of mobile phones and sleek super highways would carry 
              them back to office on the shoulders of the cheering multitude. 
              BJP’s ' India Shining ' slogan like, UNF's ' Regaining Sri 
              Lanka , attracted only the urban economy, neglecting the rural folks. 
             The 
              lesson from both Sri Lanka and India is that the benefits of rapid 
              economic development must have a human face. Fashionable terms like 
              ' fast-tracking' etc., were seen- definitely in Sri Lanka - as excuses 
              for a few rich kids to break the rules and become richer prostituting 
              the name of development. 
             To 
              expect to have India's BJP have their economic reforms impact on 
              the teeming millions of poverty-ridden Indians is more than a trifle 
              unfair. To have expected economic benefits to flow to the poor in 
              two years, in Sri Lanka, is more than unfair. 
             Both, 
              the BJP and the UNF adopted a pro-US stance to attract investment, 
              struck peace deals with Pakistan and the LTTE respectively,and if 
              there was a difference, it was in the area of world trade and subsidies 
              for agriculture, where the BJP broke ranks with the US, but where 
              the UNF slavishly followed the US. 
             And 
              yet, both these parties did raise the economies, placed as they 
              are, among the poorest of the poor in the comity of nations on Planet 
              Earth. Despite progressing instead of regressing, the rural poor 
              have humbled them. The obvious issue for the new governments though 
              would be how to retain or improve on the economic gains via growth 
              rates and keep the peace with the poor in a uni-polar pro-US world. 
             Clearly 
              recognising this fact, Sri Lanka sent her Foreign Minister to Washington 
              within the first month of assuming office, and in his words “to 
              remind them (the US) that we are there". And the US, as all 
              know, will not help without extracting its pound-of-flesh. But to 
              the masses of India, must go the credit for their maturity to reject 
              a virulent campaign against the Italian-born Ms. Gandhi. Even to 
              the great pretenders to the great democratic ideals like the US, 
              the remote possibility of electing a black President would be a 
              long way off. 
             And 
              who knows, whether this could be the beginning of a trend for democracies 
              around the world to elect, by popular vote, in time to come, a foreign 
              CEO/Head of Government to efficiently manage countries ruined by 
              its own sons and daughters of the soil.  |