“Doosra”
- PM should chuck it in
John Howard may or may not be able to pick Muttiah Muralitharan's
doosra. The Prime Minister's occasional appearances in commentary
boxes and weak-kneed devotion to anything wearing a baggy green
cap have done little to make it clear whether he is a genuine aficionado
or just another cricket tragic.
But
when Howard starts passing judgement on the Sri Lankan spinner's
action, you can't help but cringe. It is not so much the lack of
diplomacy or even questionable knowledge of the subject - the PM's
pronouncement that Murali is a chucker was no doubt based on the
best intelligence available at the time. It is that the politicians
who view the world of sport as one giant photo opportunity seem
to know precious little about it.
Having
to spend their weekends pumping the flesh at shopping centres in
key marginals no doubt limits the exposure politicians get to sport.
But, from personal experience, there are surprisingly few pollies
capable of conducting anything more than the most superficial conversation
on the nitty gritty of a game of footy or cricket - beyond those
whose entry to parliament was eased by a top-flight sports career.
There
are, no doubt, many honourable exceptions. Treasurer Peter Costello's
knowledge of his AFL team Essendon seems sound and his love of the
game genuine. Should he choose to enter the debate about the competition's
ruck rules he might not make a complete goose of himself. However,
there is usually nothing more embarrassing than when a politician
tries to exploit our passion for the game for their political ends.
As
innocent as it may have been, Howard's condemnation of Muralitharan
reeks of opportunism. Labelling Murali a chucker in Australia is
like suggesting Osama bin Laden is a bit of a cad in New York City.
But it has become obligatory for politicians to flaunt their sporting
credentials, something for which we can blame Bob Hawke.
Robert
Menzies and Malcolm Fraser both held the No.1 ticket at the blue-blooded
Carlton Football Club, although this was as much an extension of
their place in Melbourne's Liberal Party elite as it was a statement
about their sporting passion.
Hawke's
attendance at every sporting event from rugby league grand finals
to the Mudgee ferret races, however, made overt sporting pride part
of the job description - even for those pollies who would have been
much happier at the opera than watching a bunch of large chaps bump
into each other on a chilly evening.
Because
of his well-cultivated "bloke in the crowd" image, Hawke
used sport brilliantly for political purposes. The enduring image
of Hawke the cricketer is the photograph of his glasses being smashed
during a politicians versus press match in Canberra. You can't help
admire the fact he was trying to play a lusty hook shot at the time.
He
even got away with wearing that outrageous jacket and telling everyone
to take the day off after Australia won the America's Cup. But this
has set an unfortunate precedent for other, less earthy types. Premier
Bob Carr's ride on the Sydney Swans' bandwagon came to an abrupt
end with his public praise of "Plunger" Lockett. Paul
Keating took the most overtly populist position of all by declaring
himself a Collingwood supporter, a mysterious passion for a Bankstown
boy, particularly one who did not seem to have an intimate knowledge
of the club's players, history or even the rules of the game.
Of
course, politicians play an important role in sport. Governments
fund athletes and junior programs. Teams compete under national
flags and thus represent political systems and regimes. It is absurd
to say politics and sport do not mix. Sadly, however, it is usually
even more absurd when politicians try to flex their sporting muscles.
-Cricinfo Ltd |