Lanka
minus Murali a financial disaster Down Under?
By Lawrence Heyn
BRISBANE: World record holder Muttiah Muralitharan's refusal to
tour Australia for the forthcoming Test series will spell a financial
disaster for organisers here.
The
two Tests, to be played in Darwin and Cairns in July, have been
billed as a wicket-for-wicket showdown between Muralitharan and
Australian leg-spinner Shane Warne. The pair were expected to continue
from where they left off in the recent series in Sri Lanka when
they accounted for more than 50 wickets in the three Tests.
Such
a draw card is seen as important to keep interest in the winter
cricket series played in the middle of the football season. Organisers
are so desperate for Muralitharan to tour that last week the Cairns
Post, a north Queensland regional daily, devoted its entire front
page to an appeal to Muralitharan to come. The newspaper, which
has started a campaign to gain the support of cricket fans, urged
him to disregard Prime Minister John Howard and tour with the Sri
Lankans.
But
Howard's ill-informed comments, when he said Muralitharan was a
chucker, are seen by many Sri Lankan fans as the final slur from
Australia to keep Muralitharan home.
Not
that Howard's opinion should carry any weight. A self-confessed
"cricket tragic'', he is the least qualified to comment on
the finer points of the game. But it is Howard's way to throw a
red herring, to give Australians something else to talk about when
he is under so much pressure due to his domestic and international
policies.
The
prime minister is slipping in the opinion polls and has had to dodge
some hard questions with regard to how much he knew about the Americans'
barbarism towards Iraqis at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison; allegations
of mistreatment of two Australians imprisoned without charge at
Guantanamo Bay; prolonged detention of refugees, and travel rots
among the government members of parliament.
Kevin
Maher, president of Cricket Far North, hit out at Howard in a recent
newspaper interview. "Is Johnny qualified to speak on this
matter ?'' Maher asked.
Maher
said Cairns was looking forward to the contest between Muralitharan
and Warne and cricket fans in the north wanted him to come. North
Queensland tourism stands to gain a lot from a Muralitharan-Warne
match-up but the expected economic boom is likely to be hurt if
the record holder stays away.
Views
are divided among Sri Lankans.
Jayantha Pathikirikorale, who runs a successful travel agency in
Brisbane, is in touch with the feelings of Sri Lankan expatriates.
Pathikirikorale says there is pride in what the off-spinner has
achieved but also anger at what he has gone through.
"He
should come and show what a true world champion he is, '' Pathikirikorale
said.
Some other expatriate Sri Lankans just want Muralitharan to take
a break and enjoy his world record. They believe that even if Warne
overhauls him, it will be for a short time.
"Isn't
that what this is all about ?'' one commented.
Others don't want Muralitharan to suffer the same mental torment
he had been subjected to on three previous visits to Australia.
They fear that, this time, it will be too much.
But
Bill Deutrom, joint chairman of the Brisbane-based Sri Lanka Cricket
Foundation, says Muralitharan can handle it.
"He is very strong, '' Deutrom said.
"There is huge support for Murali.
"I am absolutely disgusted at John Howard for making comments
about an international cricketer. ''
Deutrom
said Muralitharan was an icon in Sri Lanka.
"Politicians have no idea of the impact Murali has had on the
whole country, what he has done to bring the country together is
amazing,'' Deutrom said.
"I would love him to come. But I will understand if he doesn't.''
Deutrom criticised Australia's treatment of Muralitharan.
"It is completely un-Australian,'' he said.
"The
fair go has gone.''
Deutrom's comments highlight the shift in the Australian sporting
mindset.
The much-vaunted ethic of giving someone a "fair go'' has been
replaced by an obsession of wanting to be winners, or the best,
all the time. This has resulted in the country's leaders and so-called
experts clambering on to the high moral ground.
But
their stance is, at best, self-righteous and fatuous.
There is little to envy in Australian sport at the moment.
Lately, the three football codes have been rocked by scandals, ranging
from rape allegations against players to drunken sprees to an open
lack of respect for women. Two elite players were sacked last week
from the New South Wales camp, for just such behaviour, tainting
rugby league's showpiece State of Origin clash with Queensland.
Australia's
infatuation with champions was best exposed a few months ago when
world 400m freestyle record holder Ian Thorpe fell off the blocks
at the Olympic trials and failed to qualify for that event at the
Athens Games.
What followed was a media frenzy and talk-back designed to pressure
Craig Stevens, who had qualified in Thorpe's place, to stand aside
in favour of the world champion. This culminated in a national media
event when Stevens came on air to announce he would withdraw from
the 400m.
All
of Australia breathed a sigh of relief, safe in the knowledge their
champion would be able to bring them gold in the 400m.
So, why is Muralitharan so out of tune with the Australian sporting
psyche?
As a high-calibre Test player he has never brought the game into
disrepute, his reputation is untarnished, unlike Warne's, and he
has given pleasure to so many with his skilful and smiling approach
to the game.
Sacked Australian Cricket Board chief executive officer Graeme Halbish
recently revealed in his book, Run Out, that Australian sights were
set on Muralitharan as far back as 1995.
Halbish
says at that time national coach Bobby Simpson had commissioned
photographs to be taken of Muralitharan's action and sent them to
the ICC.
This was weeks before Muralitharan was called for throwing in the
Boxing Day Test at the MCG.
So began Operation Get Murali.
The
most pathetic example of the campaign is the report that, after
Muralitharan secured the world record, former wicket-keeper Barry
Jarman is reported to have used a protractor on a published photograph
in an attempt to prove that Muralitharan was a chucker.
One
incident that made me sick to the stomach was seeing the crowd's
mean-minded treatment of Muralitharan in the one-day international
against Australia in Brisbane last year. The off-spinner, who injured
a leg during the game, was forced to complete his 10 overs standing
on one leg. He captured four wickets in one of the finest displays
of skill and courage displayed by a modern-day bowler, yet he was
constantly heckled and "no-balled'' by the crowd and left the
field to jeers.
Despite
Muralitharan's heroics, the game will be remembered for its boorish
"fans'' and, of course, the mean-spirited display of Australian
batsman Darren Lehmann which earned him a suspension.
No
doubt, this incident will be one of many in the forefront of Muralitharan's
mind when he weighs up the pros and cons of coming to Australia.
One thing is certain, while John Howard's views don't matter, his
beliefs are representative of some of the ill-mannered treatment
Muralitharan will receive if he tours.
Make no mistake. The jeers and the heckling will continue.
There
is no chance Muralitharan will face a reformed cricketing public.
Not if the likes of people such as Bob Simpson, Barry Jarman, Ross
Emerson and his other detractors have anything to say about it.
So, Muralitharan has to make a careful and well-considered decision
about the upcoming tour.
I believe this is a decision he cannot make himself.
Sri
Lanka Cricket and coach Dyson will have to make a judgment on what
is best for Muralitharan, and not just what is best for the team.
The world record holder will need guidance and support from the
people he respects and trusts.
No
game is worth so much that the pride and spirit of one of its greatest
players should be crushed.
Lawrence Heyn was sports editor of the Sun and Weekend newspapers
in Colombo. He migrated to Australia in 1984 and works as a journalist
in Brisbane. |