Foreign
Minister’s extradition crisis
Being behind the scenes on a campaign trail is almost a sacrosanct
experience that often marks the coming of age of media persons in
America. They take black and white photographs of Presidential candidates
in various stages of deshabille, when they eat or when they grab
forty winks or when they are getting up to go to the men's room.
These photographs are then reproduced in (sometimes grainy) black
and white because they are supposed to capture the candid moments
of a campaign that's often stage-managed to the point of killing
spontaneity altogether.
Being
behind the scenes with a Foreign Minister may be nothing like being
behind the scenes with the US Presidential candidate, but yet, certain
moments that are removed from the glare of the spotlight are memorable
and can be edifying. When Foreign Minister Kadirgamar was interviewed
by CNN for instance recently in a small studio in Washington DC,
being there for this writer was like seeing the behemoth in miniature.
The behemoth being CNN - not the Foreign Minister.
Mr.
Kadirgamar was ushered into the small waiting area outside the studio,
and then rushed into an ante room for a dash of make-up. Then, he
is back again in the waiting room with the few people around him
being made to feel comfortable while he is himself being made a
little anxious by all the attention. Then comes the go-ahead for
him to be taken to the studio, and while he is seated there with
his coffee on the table one almost sees the ultimate loneliness
of the modern day politician.
Everybody
is ushered out of the studio except one of his immediate aides,
and all the rest of us are motioned into a room that is probably
best described as the Editor's mess. It's where dozens of monitors
capture the Minister's every move as he waits for Veronica Pedrosa
to fire those few questions via Satellite. Now, this Pedrosa person,
she's another story.
The
Minister is told that his interviewer is a lady by the name of Veronica.
Minutes later, the said Veronica is doing justice to her satellite
hookup, making sure the Minister answers every pointed question
from ceasefire to his government's commitment to peace. But I'm
more interested in the few humbling moments before the interviewer
comes on -- the Minister in his enforced loneliness, at one point
peeking into the camera with a hand over his eyes for shade to cut
the glare of the spotlight. Though his wife is told that she can
be in the studio behind the forest of equipment, she chooses not
to negotiate that labyrinth.
In
the end Veronica Pedrosa finishes the interview, and then we can
see the taming of the shrew. The satellite hookup is made use of
for some banter between interviewer and interviewee. "Veronica
you must come to Sri Lanka sometime,'' says the Minister, adding
that there is a direct airline from Hong Kong where she is stationed.
Veronica is all giggles and gossamer by now. She says her co-anchor
knows much about Sri Lanka, and visits the place often because he
"even owns some property there.''
Says
the Minister that this is very interesting, and adds that the consul
in Hong Kong is a very fine man and that she could get whatever
help from him to fly over some time. "You should do that,''
he says, and adds a cheery goodbye. When the Minister comes back
from the studio to the waiting area, somebody says I (this writer…)
knew the interviewer's second name even when she was introduced
simply as Veronica. The Minister turns to me to say "I didn't
know you were a student of these matters.'' A student of CNN? Well,
you must watch the devil to criticise , no?
I
wasn't part of the Ministerial team -- if the fourth estate can
claim that distance. But recalling these happenings behind the spotlight
may for the dear reader have more value than just that of the passing
glance behind the structured image. At least it showed me that the
politician's pitfalls can also be substantial no matter how much
we'd like to vilify him or her once that final word appears in print
or that controversial image is registered on screen.
For
example, when the South Asian press met the Minister at the Ritz
Carlton hotel, these men with their writing pads and inquisitive
noses instantly got down to business. There were one or two questions
about the new government, to a Minister who was perhaps looking
for some light jaw and loosening-up before getting into the hard
bargain between politician and journalist.
But
openers were short. About the third question was " now that
Congress is in power,'' (the news had just been heard by all of
us and around the world a few hours ago that morning) "what
does your government do if there is a request for the extradition
of Prabhakaran?''
The
Minister was only beginning to wipe the sleep off his eyes, and
he had barley heard that Sonia Gandhi had won. His answer is actually
something to the effect that it's too early to tell - - but the
South Asians press on. Eventually he allows that if the matter comes
up it will be one between the two countries, and this it seems is
as diplomatic an answer one can come up with under the circumstances.
The
next day, Tamil websites and newspapers taunt him severely. Some
even say "so let him come and try to extradite Prabhakaran''
throwing a challenge bathed abundantly in sarcasm. It's as if the
Minister summoned a press conference soon after the Indian elections
results were out, for the specific announcement "we will extradite
Prabhakaran.'' No mention of probing intrepid South Asian journalists,
to whom their coffee didn't matter as long as they could get some
Ministerial quote – anything that can be put down in one English
sentence - about Prabhakran's extradition.
Well,
it may not be the loneliness of the long distance runner, but there
is definitely a certain loneliness of the politician. That's not
to say a politician is not responsible for his work -- but rather
it's to say that sometimes perspective can indeed be lost. A politician
with all the razzmatazz that surrounds him is a creature that is
at least some of the time, helpless in the face of the demands placed
on him via the quirks and happenstances of public life. |