Customs
probes under-invoicing, e-card rackets
By Asantha Sirimanne and Duruthu Edirimuni
The Customs Department is investigating a possible fraud in the
import of gold coins. GoldQuest TCOs paid only Rs 3,000 for the
Rs 80,000 plus priced gold coins purchased from the company's website.
The
coins are cleared by a shipping company located in Fort. Earlier
a courier company cleared the goods and customers were charged around
Rs 9,000 as duty and taxes. Customs investigators said they had
questioned management officials of the shipping company and around
50 customers in the under-invoicing probe.
Though
ultimate buyers had paid upwards of Rs 80,000 per gold coin the
shipping firm which cleared the goods had allegedly declared a lower
amount which was in some cases equal to the gold value.
Customs
are supposed to recover the duty on the transaction value which
is paid by the ultimate buyer and not the price of raw material.
According to Sri Lankan law it is the responsibility of the importer
to declare the correct value to customs. The value added tax of
15 percent, import duty and surcharge on import duty amounts to
around 19-20 percent, which means government should have received
at least Rs 15,000 per imported coin.
Customs
sleuths are also probing the use of so-called 'e-card' - a kind
of prepaid device used to make purchases from abroad. The use of
e-cards amounts to illegal foreign exchange dealing, officials said.
Meanwhile, central Bank officials said the new draft Banking Act
prohibits pyramid schemes and introduces tough new penalties for
those promoting such schemes.
The
draft act makes it "an offence for any person to directly or
indirectly initiate, offer, advertise, conduct, finance, manage,
supervise or direct a scheme where benefits earned by participants
in the scheme largely depend on increases in the number of participants
in the scheme or in the size of their contributions to the scheme."
This
section is called 'prohibition of pyramid schemes.' The act, drafted
with the help of the IMF, also provides for a penalty - a fine and
/ or imprisonment. The quantum of the fine and length of the jail
term is yet to be specified.
In
the section it says, "any person who contravenes the provisions
of the above section shall be guilty of an offence and shall on
conviction after summary trial before a magistrate be liable to
imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding (----)
or to a fine not exceeding or to both such imprisonment and fine
and where such offence is committed knowingly and will fully or
with reason to believe that it will cause damage or harm to any
other person, to rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than
(--) and not exceeding (---------) and to a fine of (---) or twice
the aggregated amount in Sri Lankan rupees revealed or divulged
to have been received from participants in the scheme.”
Letter to the editor
New laws needed
On behalf of the general public I wish to thank you for exposing
the pyramid scams which are spreading like cancer in our society.
I find it amazing that even after such public warnings people continue
to go after these easy money making schemes, ignoring the fact they
are going to be victims of a big scam. It is mathematically proven
that these pyramid schemes are bound to collapse sooner or later
once they reach a saturation level leaving over 90 per cent of the
investors without any return whatsoever in addition to losing the
invested money. But the irony is that all those who join these scams
tend to think they will fall into the 10 per cent category. In short,
if there are a thousand investors each investor thinks he or she
is on top of the pyramid because this is what the unscrupulous agents
make them believe.
These
types of pyramiding which is shrewdly masked by various names such
as multi-level marketing and chain referral is banned in Europe,
in India as well as in other Asian countries because the governments
of these countries treat pyramiding as a social evil similar to
gambling and prostitution. It is high time that our legislators
bring laws to ban such illegal schemes to save many innocent people
from being cheated of their hard earned money. I am sure this will
receive the attention of the finance minister before more people
fall prey to them.
Nishantha
Abeysinghe
Queries
about Gold Quest
Our reporters went undercover last week to a Gold Quest presentation
at a leading hotel, where participants were given a broad picture
on what the company is, how they operate, how 'easy' and 'good'
the money is.
The
entrance fee to the presentation amounted to Rs. 50 each and there
were handbooks of company regulations amounting to Rs. 350 each.
The seating arrangements were done for nearly 100 people in a large
conference room but approximately 30 people took part. We could
see that many were young males except for two elderly gentlemen.
All the ladies were in their early to late twenties.
The
presentation started on a very friendly note with a female presenter
interacting with the participants. Later it took on a serious note
with the presenter elaborating on the legitimacy and the authenticity
of the company.
When
a participant asked whether Gold Quest was a pyramid scheme, the
presenter snubbed him and asked him where he got that idea. She
asked him whether he knew what such a scheme is in the first place.
Apologising for her tone she said that she would explain the scheme
for the benefit of the others and not for his sake. She reiterated
that one must only convince two people, who are extremely close
relations or friends and who have the 'drive' and the 'desire' to
succeed. She said that those two friends or relations have to have
immense trust in the person introducing them and this is a serious
business. Referring to herself, she said there is hardly any need
for her to work.
When
a participant asked about the saturation levels and whether it is
not an eventuality, she in turn asked whether slaughtering cows
will saturate the beef production levels. The presenter declared
that all remaining questions should be directed to the introducers
of the participants.
Jail
quest for forex fraudsters?
Some customers of Gold Quest, who were hoping to gain
total financial freedom within three years by joining the firm's
controversial 'binary compensation plan', may now have to spend
up to five years in jail for foreign exchange fraud.
Authorities
have started gathering data on Gold Quest's Tracking Centre Owners
(TCOs) who fraudulently used credit cards to send foreign exchange
out of Sri Lanka, on behalf of those in their and others' 'downline'.
If
there are 25,000 customers as TCOs claim, and customers paid US
$ 800-1,000 for each gold coin, up to an estimated $15 - 25 million
may have gone out of the country in the last 2-3 years.
Some
of these payments were made by TCOs on behalf of third parties thereby
violating exchange control regulations. "At the moment there
is some talk of trying to revamp the law," said Arittha Wikremanayake,
one of the country's top legal experts and a former director-general
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. "But the fact is
the exchange control act still exists in the same form even as of
today, so remitting money outside without the proper approvals still
remains an offence."
For
minor offences, exchange fraudsters face an 18-month jail sentence
after summary trial before a magistrate and a small fine. "If
the prosecution is before high court, imprisonment is up to five
years," said Wikremanayake.
"The
sanctions are fairly serious. The law still remains on the books,
and it has been applied to various people at various times."
Once authorities finish investigations, bankers, doctors and port
officials and even some police and military personnel are among
those who may face prosecution.
Banks
with credit card units say they are already collecting information
to submit to the authorities. Counting among the biggest foreign
exchange offenders are some team leaders who actively campaigned
to persuade many others to join the Gold Quest's controversial referral
marketing plan by selling foreign exchange to them via their credit
cards.
Gold
Quest's money making plan was promoted mostly by Sri Lankans themselves,
rather than company officials, with those with a standing in society
taking the lead.
After
banning the scheme in Nepal in 2003, the country's Department of
Revenue Investigation (DRI) filed suit against GoldQuest local agents,
demanding a fine of Nepali Rs 1.66 billion, the Kathmandu Post reported.
They
were charged with violating the Foreign Currency Regulation Act
by fraudulently taking currency away from Nepal through non-banking
sources, the newspaper said. |