BASL
expresses concern over President's Counsel appointments
The Bar Association of Sri Lanka has expressed grave concern over
the manner in which the appointment of President's Counsel were
made. The matter came up at a meeting organised by members of the
Executive Committee of the Bar Council of Sri Lanka to facilitate
the appointment of John Seneviratne as the Justice Minister.
A
statement issued by the Bar Association over the appointment of
President's Counsel said it was pointed out at the meeting that
in terms of "Supreme Court (Senior Attorneys-at-Law) Rules
of 1980" an Attorney-at-Law who had been in active practice
for not less than 20 years was eligible for appointment as President's
Counsel if he is eminent in the profession and is a person of integrity
who has maintained high standards of conduct.
The
statement said that according to the Rules above, an application
had to be made to the Chief Justice and the President may appoint
only those Attorneys whose applications are recommended by the Chief
Justice.
It
stated that although under the 1978 Constitution relevant Rules
were rescinded the healthy practice of consulting the Chief Justice
before the appointment of a President's Counsel was made continued,
which was the process of judging the eminence of a counsel for such
an appointment.
"The
inner Bar Committee of the BASL which consists only of President's
Counsel is in the process of formulating guidelines for such appointments
and would seek the cooperation of the Chief Justice and Her Excellency
to incorporate same by way of Rules of the Supreme Court",
the statement added.
It
said that the members who were present expressed the view that the
basic requirement of 20 years in active practice and preeminence
in the Bar would be strictly adhered to in appointing President's
Counsel so that others will be in a position to look upon the President's
Counsel with respect as a leader of the Bar and that all appointments
to be made only upon the recommendations of the Chief Justice. |