Credibility,
and propriety
Our Political Editor on this same page, points out twin factors
concerning the President, viz., her credibility and her propriety.
Her credibility, and we will restrict ourselves to the narrow confines
of what the Political Editor has referred to, i.e. relating to negotiations
with the LTTE, has taken a severe beating vis-a-vis the rebel organisation.
One
must straightaway state that what the LTTE says is not the gospel.
If that organisation has strong words for the President of this
country, so be it. The LTTE is a separatist organisation opposed
by the whole country, including many Tamils whose sole representative
it claims to be.
The
issue here, however, is something else. The LTTE just doesn't believe
the President. Elsewhere in this newspaper we publish a statement
made by the new Information Minister contesting the headline of
our lead story last week wherein it is stated that the President
told the TNA MPs that she had the constitutional powers to bypass
Parliament, if need be, to grant concessions for devolving power.
Our
rejoinder to that statement comes in the form of definitive quotes
from two of the TNA MPs who were present at that very meeting, confirming
that she had indeed said so. The fact that the new UPFA government
is in the throes of a crisis need not be laboured. Apart from the
fact that they are a minority government desperately on the look-out
for a working majority, there is serious internal disagreement between
the government's coalition partners, especially between the PA and
the JVP, mainly on the direction of the negotiating process with
the LTTE.
Resolving
those issues we shall leave to the parties themselves, other than
to say that the President and her party's athletic twists and turns,
pole-vaults, somersaults and high-jumps would qualify them for a
medal at the Olympics were 'Politricks' to be made an international
sport. On the second issue of propriety, what the Political Editor
says is that the President's current visit to Britain is full of
darkness and mystery.
Firstly,
she left the country unannounced and the people she works for would
only have known she had gone if they read our last issue or saw
a photograph of her with the British Foreign Secretary at a London
hotel. Up to now, her Spokesman has had nothing to say about this
visit; he does not even know if it is a private visit, or an official
visit. That is how mysterious the visit is. But we all now know,
from 'reliable sources' so to say, that she is in Britain to attend
her daughter's convocation. Then, why the secrecy when she has every
right to be there?
The
answer our Political Editor offers is that if it is a 'private visit'
then she must foot the bill with her personal funds (like all parents
who attend such functions anywhere), not the tax-payers of this
country, who are in any event, supposedly less than 200,000 in a
country of 19 million.
The
President, all Cabinet ministers, all MPs and thousands of public
servants do not pay taxes, at least on their salaries. The estimated
cost of maintaining the public service of this country, and this
includes not only salaries, but handsome entertainment and other
allowances, vehicles and maintenance thereof, petrol, drivers, telephones,
houses, trips abroad, car permits and a whole gamut of such perks
- is Rs. 260 billion per year.
Public
servants were exempted from taxes in a bid to attract people who
were felt to be leaving the public service in the lurch and gravitating
towards the private sector which offered better terms.
In
Singapore, they took a different direction - they paid the public
servants better than what the private sector could offer. But they
were taxed like everybody else. In England when there was an uproar
about Royalty being treated differently when it came to paying taxes,
the Queen of England herself decided, in the face of public pressure
to pay income tax. The President of the USA pays taxes, or he is
supposed to.
Then,
last year came the tax amnesty to exempt even the few who are supposed
to pay taxes in this country, all this creating different classes
of people in this country. And those who benefit from these amnesties
and allowances, emoluments and foreign trips, are always those in
the upper echelons of the political establishment, their hangers-on,
and the Brahmins of the public service, not the thousands of those
in the lower brackets.
This
is what directs one's attention to the way public funds are squandered
by those at the top. The JVP, whatever their shortcomings, are still
trying to make a difference to all this. But they are hitting their
heads on a rock, it seems. The carnival goes on. When the high-profile
convert strictly private foreign visits to semi-official ones by
asking for appointments from their counterparts; when MPs have a
wholesome breakfast in a virtually functus Parliament for a price
less than a 'kahata' in tea kiosk; and travel in Pajeros when their
voters hang on to dear life (see our Plus feature story on page
13) to get to work and back home - this is when the whole edifice
begins to crumble and fall on our collective heads.
The
leaders must show the way by example, not by deceit or conceit.
Start paying your taxes for a start, like everyone else in the world
does. They might, then, have more feeling for the tax-payers' money
they so freely spend. |