Vipula
Prasanna's killer gets short sentence
The killer of Sri Lankan Vipula Prasanna was sentenced at the Old
Bailey to three years in prison. Vipula Prasanna died when he was
assaulted by the man at Wembley tube station in London.
Michael
John-Charles who pleaded to the lesser charge of manslaughter is
likely to be free by September next year since his sentence was
suspended by half and he has been in custody for around three months.
Prasanna
(40) of Sudbury whose death in May made news, was assaulted after
he had accidentally trod on the foot of John Charles's son while
trying to pass through the turnstile at the Wembley tube station.
Though
witnesses said that Prasanna did not show any belligerence and appeared
to be apologetic for the accident, John- Charles had hit him on
the jaw.
The
blow itself was not fatal but as a result of it Prasanna fell and
hit his head on the concrete pavement. He suffered injuries to his
head and had to be rushed to hospital where he died three days later.
John-Charles
had later surrendered to the police after seeing his photograph
on a police notice. The assailant's conviction came in a rather
random manner, as random as the incident that led to the death of
Vipula Prasanna who was due to return to Sri Lanka some weeks later.
The
night before John-Charles gave his plea, the judge Michael Hyam
who was scheduled to hear the case at the Old Bailey and decide
on the sentence, suffered a heart attack and died, according to
The Guardian newspaper.
While
colleagues in the Old Bailey crowded Court Number Four to pay their
respects to the deceased, John-Charles's defence lawyer announced
that he would plead guilty to manslaughter.
Judge
Giles Forrester who sentenced the accused said :"There was
a trivial matter involving your son and Mr. Prasanna who was a complete
stranger to you........But instead of putting the matter to one
side, as any sensible person would have, you lost your temper.
You
swore at him, you were aggressive and hostile and you threatened
him. Mr. Prasanna, on the preponderance of the evidence, was quite
blameless." |