No
more dreams: It’s harsh reality
By The Economist
The common man has awakened from the lovely dream of lower prices
generated by election promises to the real world of rising prices.
The dream has been transformed into a nightmare, especially after
the diesel price increase.
Prices
are now on an upward spiral. The common man knows, as much as the
economist, that when diesel prices rise that not only bus fares
increase, but the price of food as well. In fact, the price of nearly
everything would soar.
The
depreciating rupee would be a cause as well as an excuse to raise
prices of imported goods. Even a common man's basket of basic foods
has a significant component of imported items. Sugar, wheat flour,
bread, tinned fish and milk are mostly imported.
For
the poor the prices of a year ago were excessive, now it is unbearable.
The affluent and the upper middle classes could absorb these price
increases without much effect on their living standards. They can
cope with them. To them, the price increases would be a small proportion
of their incomes, especially the basic items of expenditure. In
fact they can even readjust their style of living to not increase
their living costs by much. They can curb the conspicuous consumption
they indulge in somewhat. They can compare the Colombo prices with
international prices and derive some comfort.
These
are not options for the poor whose basic living costs would rise
to unbearable levels. Beg, borrow or steal to live may be their
option. The hard fact is that the government has no policy options.
In fact the postponement of the price increases by cushioning it
with subsidies may have aggravated the problem. Subsidies are not
a realistic option for a government saddled with a large budget
deficit and a growing public debt.
The
Fiscal Responsibility Act that requires the government to keep expenditure
within accepted parameters of budget deficits, make the task impractical.
The inadequate revenues and already rising public expenditures compound
these difficulties.
What
then can be done? First of all it would be necessary to explain
to the people that the price rises are inevitable owing to global
conditions. They must be told that if the government were to reduce
prices through government subsidies then the people would have to
pay for these in some other ways.
The
concept that "there is no such thing as a free lunch"
must be explained. It must be explained not only to people but also
to the highly intelligent ideologically bound constituent elements
of the government. Taxing the rich to pay for the poor has serious
limitations as the poor far outnumber the rich. Additional government
expenditures invariably fall on the shoulders of the poor.
The
low productivity in the economy accounts for both the high prices
of domestically produced goods, as well as the difficulty in making
a significant headway on exports. Increased productivity would enhance
productivity, reduce unit costs and make exports competitive in
world markets. Instead the panacea for poor export performance has
been the depreciation of the rupee that brings in its wake higher
import prices and higher costs of production. Better work ethics,
better management practices and benefits associated with improved
productivity could increase exports and reduce the strain on the
balance of payments. Although the country's trade dependence, particularly
the import dependence, and more specifically the price increases
for crude oil, have been the fundamental and underlying reasons
for the price increases we are facing, it should not be forgotten
that fundamental weaknesses in the structure and performance of
the economy are important determinants of the inflationary trends
that we are facing.
Getting
the economic fundamentals right is the real solution to the problem
of prices. Providing incentives for agricultural production, reducing
the costs of cultivation, reducing marketing margins and improving
the technological skills are the means of improving small farm agricultural
productivity. Such improvements could reduce food prices, a key
element in the cost of living.
With
oil prices increasing, the trade gap enlarging, reserves declining
and the rupee depreciating, there is little hope of the price rises
abating. The chaotic political scenario is hardly the environment
for proper economic decision-making. The rich would be quite vociferous
about the high costs of living. Yet they can cope with it. The poor
would have to suffer. The real danger is that the distortions created
by the inflationary trends would hamper economic growth and exacerbate
the problem in the future. |