Shut
out of cyberspace
Authrorities are still at sea
over who or what damaged the submarine cable off Mount Lavinia that
left about 800,000 SLT subscribers stranded in the net for 6 days
Azmie Sally, Information Technology Administrator
at Walkers Tours Ltd., sat at his office computer last week. He
wanted to make contact with tour operators in world capitals about
their tour groups visiting Sri Lanka. Alas, he could neither surf
the Internet nor use his e-mail!
In
desperation his company had to turn to another Systems Provider
who made available a satellite connection. "Fortunately this
occurred during an off peak season. It was nevertheless inconvenient,"
he told The Sunday Times.
Azmie's
employers and many others, including individual clients were among
800,000 Sri Lanka Telecom (SLT) subscribers who were shut out of
cyberspace for six days, because a submarine cable located 10kms
away from Mount Lavinia had been ruptured on August 22.
In
this modern age of technology, that it took six days for the SLT
to put things right was bad enough but in addition they had not
only forced some of their clients to turn to other systems providers,
but many clients suffered loss of business. If this clearly highlighted
the unpreparedness of the SLT to cope with an emergency situation,
what followed in the days after the breakdown was worse.
The
SLT accused a foreign vessel, Merchant Vessel (MV) 'State of Nagaland'
for causing damage to the underwater cable. On Monday (23) Sri Lanka
Telecom filed action in the Colombo High Court seeking the detention
of the ship and claiming damages amounting to Rs.500 million. High
Court Judge Sarath Ambeypitiya ordered the detention of the vessel.
The date of the case had been fixed for September 6.
However
within three days, SLT had to eat its own words. The Indian MV 'State
of Nagaland' had requested the Navy to release the ship on the grounds
of the failure to produce adequate evidence against the ship. Navy
spokesman Commodore Jayantha Perera, told The Sunday Times that
they were informed by the SLT that they would be withdrawing the
case filed the as there was not enough evidence. The Navy had then
released the ship.
With
the lack of evidence SLT has been left with a situation where they
have not been able to trace the persons or vessel that could have
caused the damage. This would mean that Telecom would have to bear
the damages for the loss of traffic and goodwill, which they had
earlier planned to claim from the 'State of Nagaland'.
According
A. W. Weerakoon, Director merchant shipping ‘M.V. State of
Nagaland’ had been in the locality on August 20 and had moved
into territorial waters the next day. This led to the belief that
the ship was involved in the mishap.
But
this was contradicted by the spokesperson for Indian High Commission
Nagma Mallik, who told The Sunday Times that the ship 'State of
Nagaland' never entered Sri Lankan territorial waters.
She
also added that international insurance companies that conducted
a probe on the incident had found that the particular vessel could
not have damaged the SMWIII (SEA-ME-WEIII) submarine cables. Other
sources in Merchant Shipping say they cannot determine which of
the vessels present in the area could have damaged the cables. On
Friday (27) investigations were still continuing to find out who
or what could have caused the damage.
The
breakdown of SMWIII cable system was detected on August 22, (Sunday)
at 01:40 a.m. and the failure resulted in the disruption of international
telephone services and total failure of Internet services along
the line.
However,
SLT restored the international telephone services via SMW II and
satellite services on the same day and services to key business
customers who operate communication lines [International Private
Leased Lines (IPLC)] on SMW III were also restored. SLT's connection
to the Internet fibre optic backbone is through the Mount Lavinia
landing point of Segment S4 of undersea SMW-III, (South East Asia-
Middle East - Western Europe) fibre optic cable link managed by
the French and Singapore telecom. The S4 segment, which powers Sri
Lanka, also runs through Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand,
Myanmar and India. The SMW-III network supports 40GBPS bandwidth
with two fibre pairs covering 41 landing points in 35 countries.
As
tens of thousands of subscribers continued to be affected on Tuesday,
a cable repair ship manned by both SLT personnel and a SMW III repair
teams set sail to the site. With suspected multiple damages been
made to the fibre, the team worked hard despite the South West monsoon
prevailing in the waters to restore services.
On
Wednesday (25), the cable was hauled and moved to the ship to localize
the fault and test the line. The restoration process was reportedly
more complex than expected as it had to be carried out without interrupting
other SMW III traffic, which had increased due to the high usage
of the cable due to the on going Olympic Games.
However,
how the damage was caused to the cable still remains a mystery,
after there was insufficient evidence to prove that ‘MV State
of Nagaland' was responsible for it. Mahinda Herat, General Manager,
International Services, Sri Lanka Telecom, says that a ship may
have anchored in a restricted area and the anchor could have got
entangled with the cable.
“Thereafter,
if the ship attempted to pull out of the harbour, dragging the cable
with it, it could have resulted in damaging the cable," he
explained. However, he's not sure if this has been the case in this
incident as the cable repair team has yet to complete its analysis
of the cable, to determine the actual cause and extent of the damage.
The cost of repairs once determined would be borne by the SMWIII
Consortium, he said. The Consortium consists of 90 signatories of
operators around the world, Mr. Herat said. However, the loss of
traffic and goodwill amounting to about Rs. 500 million will have
to be borne by SLT, he added.
SMWIII,
(an optical fibre cable) has two contingency systems that work on
a load-sharing basis, where in a case of an emergency, services
can be shared between both SMWII and the satellite, he said. However,
due to technological and capacity disparities between the two cables,
SMWIII couldn't be fully restored by either of the two back up systems,
he said.
Commenting
on remedial steps he said, SLT had already subscribed to obtaining
SMWIV, a high capacity cable, which, should be commissioned by September
next year. This high capacity cable would avoid the recurrence of
any breakdowns. As the SLT tries to determine the party responsible
for the damage and looks to the introduction of backup systems there
were business establishments and individuals who were looking to
switch to other servers. We spoke to some establishments that were
affected by the breakdown of the SLT cable.
Hasitha
Premaratne of HNB Stock Brokers (Pvt) Ltd., told The Sunday Times
that the breakdown had minimal effect on the Colombo Stock Exchange
(CSE) and was negligible. As the bourse was not internet-based,
trading of stocks wasnot hindered although the damage had had an
impact on the quality of services provided. However Mr. Premaratne
said that it had an effect on foreign investors, as some had been
unable to contact their local stockbrokers.
Describing
how Gabo Travels (Pvt) Ltd., coped with the breakdown, IT Manager,
Hassan Ali, said their e-mail was not affected as they used a different
service provider to obtain e-mail access. However their Internet
access was hindered severely. Therefore, they had to re-direct their
day-to-day Internet operations too, via a substitute service provider.
Dr.
Ruvan Weerasinghe, Head of the University of Colombo School of Computing
said that the Lanka Education And Research Network (LEARN), which
connects universities around the country had other links.
"When
the breakdown occurred we moved all our traffic to our other ISPs,"
he said. "Some universities that were only connected to SLT
without going through LEARN found themselves in the lurch,"
Dr. Weerasinghe said.
The
damage to the vital cable has left behind a trail of questions.
One of them has been how a ship managed to anchor in a 'so called'
anchor prohibited area and how it had gone unnoticed by both the
Navy and Port authorities.
If
the Indian vessel wasn't the guilty party, then the actual perpetrator
has to be found and held responsible for the damages both to the
cable and to the country. If not, how does SLT plan to cough up
Rs. 500 million to cover losses?
Reporting team: Marisa de Silva, Mahangu Weerasinghe, Asif
Fuard and
Sachithra Mahendra |